If we're looking at methods to deal with HSM and its ilk, AdPro should
also be added to the list, if it's not, already. Seems that they're using
the same tactics as HSM, containing their spam in an image file rather
than in text.
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog
Patrick Bores said:
I have noticed that most of the NS records for these spammers are the
same or similar. Would it be too expensive to do a quick lookup of NS
records to block these guys?
no, I don't think so -- it sounds like a very interesting technique...
there's a lot of these
On Sat, 7 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you are running version 2.31 (under linux), the change you need to make
is in the following file:
/usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf
on line 12 it states:
report This mail is probably spam. The original message has been altered
You
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mike Leone wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) had this to say on 12/07/02
at 20:06:
I need to remove a sentence from the report SA generates. Specifically
the part about This mail is probably spam.. Apparently it's confusing
some of my users. I'm using
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Justin Mason wrote:
Patrick Bores said:
I have noticed that most of the NS records for these spammers are the
same or similar. Would it be too expensive to do a quick lookup of NS
records to block these guys?
no, I don't think so -- it sounds like a very
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mike Burger wrote:
If we're looking at methods to deal with HSM and its ilk, AdPro should
also be added to the list, if it's not, already. Seems that they're using
the same tactics as HSM, containing their spam in an image file rather
than in text.
For what it's
Could someone post the answer to the list?
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, December 06, 2002 10:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] sample userprefs rules?
Could some kind soul point me to a sample userprefs file with a goodly set
of
user defined rules?
Thanks!
--
R o b
I'm already doing that, myself. G But they register so many domains
that it's sometimes hard to keep up with the list.
Out of curiosity..I've been rejecting with a code of 550...what's the
difference between 550 and 553?
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Mike
On Sun, Dec 08, 2002 at 10:24:23PM -0500, Mike Burger wrote:
Out of curiosity..I've been rejecting with a code of 550...what's the
difference between 550 and 553?
RFC 2821, s4.2.3:
550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
(e.g., mailbox not found, no access, or
California Business and Professionals Code section 17538.45 states (in part):
(f) (1) In addition to any other action available under law, any
electronic mail service provider whose policy on unsolicited
electronic mail advertisements is violated as provided in this
section may bring a civil
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002 the voices made Mike Burger write:
Out of curiosity..I've been rejecting with a code of 550...what's the
difference between 550 and 553?
URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc2821.txt #4.2.2:
# 550 Requested action not taken: mailbox unavailable
# (e.g.,
Hello folks,
At my company, we get an extremely high level of spam.
Red hat 8.0 brings spamassasin installed along with
sendmail. Can I run this out of the box or do I have
to modify to make this work?
I have 5000 plus users and I worry about
false-positives.
Regards,
JQ
Title: new user with trivial setup questions...any more experienced user can answer and save me!
I'm attempting to run Spamassassin sitewide on a Cobalt Qube 3. (I run a small mail server for about 12 friends and family members) and am confused about getting it running. I created a
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
With regard to section B, above, is there currently a recognized automatic
notification by sendmail or other MTAs that spam is not accepted?
I make it clear in my HELO string that UCE isn't welcome on my servers.
Spammers don't read bounces or
If you include it in your HELO string, I wonder if that's enough notification as
required by the previously mentioned California law?
Harold
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 8 Dec 2002, Harold Hallikainen wrote:
With regard to section B, above, is there currently a recognized automatic
I am very happily running SA w/Amavis on a Cobalt Raq4 for some time now.
There are 60+ domains on the server. Several users have .forward files as
the mails coming into those accounts need to be passed to one or more of the
following:
leave copy in box for User A
User 2 on the server in the same
16 matches
Mail list logo
