i luv it,
it has been working flawless for me
using suse 8.2
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
John Stewart wrote on Wed, 28 May 2003 16:09:05 -0500:
You want the headers! Bayes uses these.
That's correct, but if you look at a spamassassin -D output you see that the
header information usually plays a marginal role. From a typical message you
may have 1 - 3 matches in the headers but
Search on sourceforge appears totally screwed..
Every so often I see this in my maillog -
May 18 07:42:06 relay spamd[18036]: Cannot open bayes_path
/home/filter/.spamassassin/bayes R/W: File exists
May 18 07:42:06 relay spamd[18036]: identified spam (50.0/5.0) for
filter:500 in 11.6 seconds,
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:33 AM +1200 Simon Byrnand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
No,
It's just that by an extremely annoying
Thanks!
I really appreciate all the feedback. My blacklist is ever growing.. I
run qmail, and I look at the queues every morning.. The biggest issue is
that one of the domains hosted on my system used to have free webmail
hosting via Everyone.net ... HUGE mistake! They obviously sell the email
Another vote for qmail-qmailscanner-vpopmail. I use spamc in qmail-scanner,
looking up against SQL for user prefs, and a maildrop script, if the user
desires, to drop their tagged spam into the TRASH IMAP folder; if they pop
their mail, they never see it, if they IMAP it, they can get it if they
| BTW, good news for large site-wide bayes dbs: Theo has implemented a way
| to avoid auto-expiry in 2.60. The plan is that expiry can be disabled by
| setting bayes_expiry_max_db_size to 0.
|
| Then folks who wish to do an expiry from cron, can control this by using
| a config file which uses
ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 16.02 skrev Tom Meunier:
I think I know what he means, because I've considered the same thing myself, for a
moment or two.
He wants to parse his maillog file to throw away everything but the processing
message message_id and the identified spam lines. Then he can go
ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 16.45 skrev DEFFONTAINES Vincent:
I'd like to help, since no-one answered, you're Dutch (sniff, sniff
Nobody loves me) and anyway I've been through the whole gamut of
learning Postscript and SA, from filter to spampd to amavisd-new.
I can make SA-Exim 4 work
ons, 28.05.2003 kl. 16.39 skrev Maciek J. Maciak:
What *Amavis* version are you using? Because that's the thing that's
lousing your rules up. Chances are that that's an old version too - grab
the newest release.
If I may ask, how exactly is amavis looking at the rulesets for sa ? I
tor, 29.05.2003 kl. 00.53 skrev Simon Byrnand:
I said: keep your SA version up to date. I.e., don't winge if you're
using 2.54 and the current version is 2.55. Least of all if you're
still running 2.43.
Sure, but what relevance does saying What you write above certainly isn't
the case for
- Original Message -
From: Michael J. Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:19 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Worried about RBLs
I can't for the life of me get anything to take that I put in
the config files... I tried putting it in
SL == Shayne Lebrun [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
SL nslookup relays.monkeys.com
SL Server: black.MUSKOKA.COM
SL Address: 216.123.107.2
SL Name:relays.monkeys.com
SL Relays.monkeys.com doesn't currently have an IP addy assigned to it, looks
SL like.
Which has nothing to do with looking up
How do you instal sapmassasin, am very new to unix platform so a step by
step procedure will help
frank
- Original Message -
From: Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Michael J. Kidd [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:24 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Worried about
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML included in message
BASE64_ENC_TEXT
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 01:47:52PM +0100, Paul Hutchings wrote:
Any ideas? Looks like the message is still being scanned/tagged, just not
sure what it's trying to tell me.
It's telling you that it couldn't get a lock on the DB (aka: autolearning).
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
If God didn't
I did exactly what your URL suggests in the sql/README, but it assumes
that you still have local users or at least local user accounts. I ran
the test and looked at the output of spamd and it isn't even querying
the DB :(
Here is my config:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
# This is the right
You need to run spamd with a flag to use sql prefs; -q as I recall.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Upwood, James
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:04 AM
To: Andreas Haase; SpamAssassin
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] User_prefs without local
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
HI,
On Wed, 28 May 2003 22:52:32 -0500 (CDT)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In short, yes there are a lot of ignorant people that look no farther than
the From: line. Fortunately DNSBL maintainers are stupid enough to let a
single (l)user dictate
BA == Bob Apthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BA ... DNSBL maintainers are _not_ stupid enough ...
BA Or are you vaguely referring to SpamCop's busticated statistics and
BA unwillingness to remove obviously broken listings in a timely manner
BA when notified? IIRC, it doesn't take much to
hmm.. is that relatively normal, say if there's a couple of accesses going
on at the same time?
It doesn't appear particularly often in the logs, only noticed it when I
happened to be tailing it to check some changes were working as planned (and
yes, it does appear prior to the changes :-)
Quoting Ron McKeating [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
[...]
This really was an innocent user from a local council. What on earth
could they have set on their
We have resolved our external tests problem by installing the djbdns caching
dns server (http://cr.yp.to/djbdns.html) on the amavisd/spamassassin relay
server. Prior to installation the log was showing TIMING reports of ranging
from 1 to 5 ms, with the average being about 18000 ms. If we
Is there a way to update the ruleset with the latest on the spamassassin
servers? Something like spamassassin --update hostname would be nice.
I'm not on the list, so please cc: me directly.
Thanks,
Pinku
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 09:35:35AM -0500, Pinku Surana wrote:
Is there a way to update the ruleset with the latest on the spamassassin
servers? Something like spamassassin --update hostname would be nice.
nope. the only way to upgrade the rules is to upgrade the whole package.
--
Randomly
Next, however you're calling spamc, you need to pass the user's
username/domain. Using qmail-scanner requires a patch; search the archives
and you'll find it, me thinks.
-Original Message-
From: Upwood, James [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Shayne
Great, that worked... Only problem is, it is only seeing the user
root in the DB. This makes me assume that I still have to have a
local user accounts?
For example, I put my work account in the table under the username field
as [EMAIL PROTECTED] and tried to whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it
I believe you need to tell it what runlevels to start at. I don't have
Red Hat, but a man chkconfig should help.
John Lang wrote:
chkconfig --add spamd
to get it to start at boot. However, it isn't. I am able to start
spamd from the command prompt.
I did more research, it appears I need to call spamc as [EMAIL PROTECTED],
problem is that I am using sendmail with spamass-milt and it calls
spamd. IS there any way to call the milter or spamc using a variable or
something that would be derived from the To: in the header?
-Jim
-Original
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 08:22:10AM -0700, John Lang wrote:
chkconfig --add spamd
to get it to start at boot. However, it isn't. I am able to start
spamd from the command prompt.
Hi John,
What does 'chkconfig --list spamd' display? You should see
a 3:on in there, hopefully. If
Greetings!
I am a U.S. magazine business magazine reporter based in Paris, and I'm
working on a story about Wanadoo.
In the course of my research, I've become aware of the fact that Wanadoo
was in a lot of hot water about 18 months ago because the wanadoo.fr
domain was being used as the origin
Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host instead of the MX
hosts? (I'm assume that both of your MX servers must forward the mail to a
central server.)
Your suggestion is the exact opposite of the intended function. The idea
is to run two relays to share the load, or run as
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:32:05PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
3rd and 4th are *always* consecutive, whether you like it or not.
They are not always. It often happens that mailer logs some message
that comes between these 3rd and 4th lines of spamd.
Possibly. I don't know what you
Since modifying the code to handle storing Bayes in MySql seems like a
more long term project, is there any immediate way to support sharing
the Bayes DB over NFS with proper file locking ?
adam
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 12:12, Joe Breu wrote:
Just a thought, why not run SA on the delivery host
John Lang wrote on Thu, 29 May 2003 08:22:10 -0700:
chkconfig --add spamd
on Suse it's chkconfig spamd on, try that.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de http://msie.winware.org
man chkconfig
HINT: look for the --level option.
-Derek
At 08:22 AM 5/29/2003, John Lang wrote:
Good morning. I'm probably going to get flamed for asking this...
I'm running SA on RH7.3 w/sendmail.
SA was installed from the bianaries. I have copied the provided startup
script to
In the course of my research, I've become aware of the fact that
Wanadoo was in a lot of hot water about 18 months ago because the
wanadoo.fr domain was being used as the origin of a lot of hack
attacks and spam. The company seemed unresponsive at the time to
requests to clean up its act, and
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
First off, this thing KICKS ASS!
Second off, Here are a couple more mutt bindings that might be useful to
stick in USAGE for others to enjoy. (Near the X binding to report spam)
# Learn or unlearn a message as SPAM!
macro index z | sa-learn --single -D --spam
macro index Z | sa-learn --single -D
Hi,
I can't speak for anyone else on the list but...
We problably have most of, if not all, wannado dialup and DSL ip's in
our personal RBL. We do not block their actual email servers, but I do
have a personal blacklist for anything coming from them that dumps them
into /dev/null.
Being
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Hannu Liljemark wrote:
In the course of my research, I've become aware of the fact that
Wanadoo was in a lot of hot water about 18 months ago because the
wanadoo.fr domain was being used as the origin of a lot of hack
attacks and spam. The company seemed
At 06:13 PM 5/29/2003 +0200, Andy Reinhardt wrote:
Greetings!
I am a U.S. magazine business magazine reporter based in Paris, and I'm
working on a story about Wanadoo.
In the course of my research, I've become aware of the fact that Wanadoo
was in a lot of hot water about 18 months ago because
Ron McKeating said:
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
HTML_50_60 (2.1 points) BODY: Message is 50% to 60% HTML
HTML_MESSAGE (1.1 points) BODY: HTML included in
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Andy Reinhardt wrote:
Greetings!
Howdy.
snip
You'd be better off asking in a more general discussion forum like the
new.admin.net-abuse.email newsgroup. You could even ask the spam-l
mailing list for specifics about the spam side of things. Asking the
mailing list of
Mark said:
A few weeks ago I thought of an interesting new statistical way of
fighting spam. Having collected a few weeks worth of maillog data (about 500
MB), I wrote a small Perl script, matching IP addresses by the following
simple rule (in words):
Look at SMTP connections, and
almost there.. .you missed 1 line
#chkconfig --add spamd;
#chkconfig --levels 2345 spamd on
On Thursday, May 29, 2003, at 11:22 AM, John Lang wrote:
Good morning. I'm probably going to get flamed for asking this...
I'm running SA on RH7.3 w/sendmail.
SA was installed from the bianaries. I
Mark Martinec said:
Perhaps it would be simpler for us SA admins to have a separate
setting to just turn off opportunistic auto-expiry, than having
to tinker with two config files. The 'sa-learn --force-expire'
could still benefit from the max_db_size setting in the standard
config file.
AL == Alan Leghart [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
AL to use different encoding (although, IIRC, it's not base-64 by
AL default). I tested on one machine on our LAN, and from inside
AL Excel 2000, select File and Send as email. Voici, base-64 encoded
AL when it goes out. I'm glad I didn't follow
Hello
I am new to the list, and I am very sorry if this question has been
answered.
I am running spammassasing along with qmail-scanner and qmail (well DOH).
I created an e-mail account where junk e-mails are send to, and then have
cron run sa-learn on the maildir of that e-mail address to
- Original Message -
From: Tony Earnshaw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SpamAssassin Talk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:33 PM
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Best way to process the log?
3rd and 4th are *always* consecutive, whether you like it or not.
They are not always. It
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 13:26, Alan Leghart wrote:
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 3:18 PM +0100 Ron McKeating
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the points
awarded
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 00:35, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since you use qmail-scanner, what do you set your QMAILQUEUE environment
variable to? How does it know to use spamc? Do you set it to the patch of
spamc? If so, how do you get spamc+qmail-scanner-queue.pl working together?
My tcp.smtp
We have had a couple of instances recently where our mail server became
severely overloaded, with many spamd processes running. One was on the
21st when dorkslayers.com went down. The other was yesterday for no
apparent reason. In each case, we had around 150 spamd processes
running, with 2.5
I don't suppose someone out there could tell me how to tell procmail to
simply accept the message and stop processing?
Generally, just deliver it to $DEFAULT. Something like this (towards
the beginning of your procmailrc):
FROM=`formail -rx To: | sed -e 's/^[ ]*//'`
Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass. I know it
is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all
understand it was a compliment. It was also an understatement.
Amidst all the questions in here, I wouldn't want the developers to lose
sight of how well
Never mind. Brain not engaged before keyboard activated.
Apologies all around.
--
Joseph F. Noonan
Rigaku/MSC Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, 28 May 2003 at 3:55pm Rick Macdougall wrote:
Hi,
It has? That's news to my dns...
@40003ed514501c91686c rblsmtpd: 200.171.247.234 pid
So I have spamassassin 2.55 installed. However, it doesn't look like
spamc is passing any information on to sa-learn. I do temporary store
the spam in it's own folder... so it is it valid to pipe messages to:
spamassassin -d | sa-learn --spam --single
Is what I want to do to populate my
I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of
500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers.
Nice job. Keep at it guys.
Amen to that!
5 spams? Heh, show them how much they WOULD get if it wasn't for
SpamAssassin. :)
spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines:
On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 14:47, AltGrendel wrote:
Another note: If you have problems and you know that SA is running
properly (all tests work), then you need to start digging at their web
site. The archives are good and the FAQ at the site should answer most
basic questions.
By their I mean the
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 12:34:50PM -0700, Dale Harris wrote:
So I have spamassassin 2.55 installed. However, it doesn't look like
spamc is passing any information on to sa-learn. I do temporary store
spamc doesn't do learning. spamd can autolearn, but that's it.
spamassassin -d | sa-learn
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:36:24PM -0500, Stewart, John wrote:
I think you'll know my next question... when is it due? =)
Hopefully, in around a month. (more specifically, sometime around the
beginning of July is the plan.)
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Don't Hit A Man When He's Down. Kick
spamassassin -D --lint, read up at the top where it tells you how many messages are in
the Bayes database. Then run sa-learn. Then do it again. You'll see it incremented
accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Marek Dohojda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:12 PM
I've been having this problem too. The locking code is in UnixLocker.pm
and is pretty straightforward. One thing I notice is that the timeout for
a stale lock is 10 minutes. If a SpamAssassin instance tries and fails to
get a lock for 10 minutes, it will decide the lock is stale and remove
Aye, ATTABOY! Definitely a kick ass piece of
software. spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines: spam:
304 clean: 80 skipped: 0 total: 384 processed:
384 The mail log was rotated earlier this morning. And yes, the
stats are accurate.. only 80 legit mails, everything else SPAM. If
Greetings,
Silly me and my lack of MRTG-fu. Swapping the perminute option for
perhour worked. The box just doesn't get enough mail to make the
perminute option work.
http://www.pbp.net/mrtg/spam_jezebel.html ---the spam-stats graph,
stats collected from a machine colocated here.
Nearly 80%
From: Christopher Meiklejohn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Thomas Schulz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Spamd running after spamc exit
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:24:56 -0400
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Are you using quotas on the system, I have
I have long thought I should have a monthly failure of the spam filters so
that clients will remember what is really happening. One downside to
effective filtering is the clients think the spam problem has gone away.
Mark Thornton
San Marcos Internet, Inc
512-393-5300
- Original Message
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 12:50 PM -0700 Jonathan Nichols
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
spam-stats from one of the co-lo machines:
spam: 304
clean: 80
skipped: 0
total: 384
processed: 384
OK, time for show and tell, I guess. This is yesterday on one of my two
SA+MD relays:
spam: 34,587
clean:
Another question... If running spamd to scan the mail ( using
qmail-scanner as the go between ), where is the config file that the spamd
process uses? I can't for the life of me get anything to take that I put in
the config files... I tried putting it in /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf, I
Here here as well
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Cameron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:16 PM
To: SpamAssassin listserve
And a big Amen! from the choir!
TC
- Original Message -
From: Jack Gostl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: SpamAssassin listserve [EMAIL
Jack Gostl said:
Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass.
Hee Hee. I know I posted that very saying about SA, but I did so on the
vpopmail maillist.
I know
it is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all
understand it was a compliment. It was
I'm not so sure about that. I have only a few hundred hams learned (almost
all by hand), and thousands of spams learned (almost all automatically) and
everyone here thinks SA has almost supernatural abilities to ferret out the
spam and ham. And it's just getting better, the more ham I give it
Most of this is confusion, and a stubborn friend of mine that claims he
saw otherwise.
Has report_header been removed?
I'm not seeing it in some docs, but I thought I saw it in others..
Now, what's taken its place again? report_safe?
---
Mike Batchelor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*FLAME ON*
Yeah, I kinda noticed.
Look in the recent MIMEDefang archives for the thread problems with
bayes (?) database access for one possibility.
Your search terms got me this:
No matches were found for '(problems or problem) and with and bayes
Jeremy Oddo wrote:
I agree fully. I have a very light-traffic server (10 users across 3
domains). One of our employees would receive 120+ SPAM messages a day. I
decided to put SA in place mainly for him (although I put every user on
it). He's still getting a lot of SPAM...it's just not making
- Original Message -
From: Ron McKeating [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:18 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] Advice Please
Why would an ordinary innocent email user be base 64 encoding their
ordinary text. And why does it get such a big score. Here is the
When I run chkconfig --list, spamd does not show up.
When I run chkconfig --list spamd, I get the following:
service spamd supports chkconfig, but is not registered (run 'chkconfig
--add spamd')
If I enter chkconfig --add spamd It just does it.
Then after that, if I enter chkconfig --levels 2345
I had an immediate and dramatic result for my experiment. The number of
these File exists errors getting logged decreased drastically, and the
number of bayes.lock.* files in my bayes_path went to nothing, or one or
two at most. I'm also seeing the bayes_journal getting updated frequently,
so
On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 02:52:06PM -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Has report_header been removed?
In 2.50, yes.
Now, what's taken its place again? report_safe?
yes.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
113 grams, 10 milliliters ... He's lead, Jim.
pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
OK, time for show and tell, I guess. This is yesterday on one of my two
SA+MD relays:
spam: 34,587
clean: 16,882
bounced: 426
discarded: 719
skipped: 6310
processed: 58,924
(I forgot to count access_db bounces, oh well... this shows what SA+MD
alone processed)
I have a 2nd one in
Is anyone else seeing this?
Since I installed SA 2.55 recently and subscribed to this list, I'm
getting the digest indexes delivered properly, but the emails are not
including any of the actual messages sent to the list.
I use PINE for all my email, in case that helps.
Regards,
Craig.
--
http://www.claraocr.org/
http://freshmeat.net/
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office equipment for less on eBay!
http://adfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/711-11697-6916-5
___
Wow, I don't think I've seen an AOL! thread on SATalk before :)
But hey while were at it.. Me Too! :)
( For an explanation of AOL! see
http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/A/AOL.html )
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: eBay
Get office
At 02:52 PM 5/29/2003 -0700, Jonathan Nichols wrote:
Most of this is confusion, and a stubborn friend of mine that claims he
saw otherwise.
Has report_header been removed?
I'm not seeing it in some docs, but I thought I saw it in others..
Now, what's taken its place again? report_safe?
Well a
First, let me second those att-a-boys. Spamassassin is a demonstration of
what a full spectrum, high technology implementation can do. It solves an
important problem, and solves it well. Congrats to the SA team (and to the
supporting cast of Razor, Pyzor, DCC and the RBL's).
OK, time for show
Hi,
Instead of simply dumping spam, I'm now trying to be a bit more proactive
and report it to 'Vipul's Razor et al', using my folder of spam missed by
spamassasin and Theo Van Dinter's Handlespam.
I don't use real domains addresses on my home machines and whilst I've
changed the Handlespam
At 13:53 29/05/03 +0100, Richard Hopkins wrote:
--On Thursday, May 29, 2003 11:33 AM +1200 Simon Byrnand
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:40 28/05/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
I just upgraded from 2.53 to 2.55. Was there some discussion awhile back
about 2.55 having a problem with RBL?
No,
It's
Probably a dumb question, but...
Could somebody please advise the best method of whitelisting messages from a given
mailing list?
Users here are occasionally getting incoming mailing list messages flagged because of
their contents. I'd like to be able to atomatically whitelist those messages
hey folks,
Would it be wise (actually, would it do any harm) to have one BAYES
database for a whole site, instead of per-user basis? (Just a hand full
of users.)
How can I do that? Did not find any note, how to define a site wide
BAYES database. TIA
...guenther
--
char *t=[EMAIL PROTECTED];
| Could somebody please advise the best method of whitelisting messages
| from a given mailing list?
|
| 'whitelist_from' doesn't work because (a) the messages come 'From:'
| individual posters, and (2) the 'Sender:' address (which does reflect
| the mailing list) isn't in the set of headers
At 11:25 AM 5/30/2003 +1200, Robert Sinton wrote:
'whitelist_to', when given the mailing list address, only contributed -6.
I guess I could use all_spam_to, but it starts to look a bit odd given
that the mailing list address doesn't actually represent a local user.
I could of course just write
Jack Gostl wrote:
Someone posted a message here saying that SA really kicks ass. I know it
is an international community on this list, so let's make sure we all
understand it was a compliment. It was also an understatement.
Amidst all the questions in here, I wouldn't want the developers to lose
How about this?
BODY dottywords /[a-z]\.[a-z].+[a-z]\.[a-z].+[a-z]\.[a-z].+[a-z]\.[a-z]/is
Probably not too efficient, and completely untested, but it should match
messages with 4 or more d.ott.y w.or.ds
At 10:56 AM 5/24/2003 -0700, lindsay adams wrote:
I just got a piece of pr0n spam that had
I wonder if the'll mind is I use procmail to auto forward all spam above say
score of 15 or 20 to them ?..
- Original Message -
From: Alan Leghart [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Jeremy Oddo [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SpamAssassin
-Original Message-
From: Robert Sinton
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 4:26 PM
Could somebody please advise the best method of whitelisting
messages from a given mailing list?
Users here are occasionally getting incoming mailing list
messages flagged because of their contents.
Quoting Mark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Look at SMTP connections, and consider all IP addresses spam that, in one
session, deliver to 4 or more local recipients simultaneously.
This gave me a good idea for a test I could run in MIMEDefang. I have a small
wrapper in my mimedefang-filter around the
At 02:13 AM 5/30/2003 +0200, Mark Martinec wrote:
A useful solution to white or blacklist a mailing lists is to check
the envelope address, and not to try to guess the sender address
from mail header. I'm not saying that the present mechanisms should be
replaced or removed, it does have its place,
At 01:45 AM 5/30/2003 +0200, guenther wrote:
hey folks,
Would it be wise (actually, would it do any harm) to have one BAYES
database for a whole site, instead of per-user basis? (Just a hand full
of users.)
There are some advantages and some drawbacks here. On the advantage side as
it learns
I now have users complaining that they receive as much as 5 spams out of
500. This is absurdity worthy of the Marx brothers.
Nice job. Keep at it guys.
Amen to that!
5 spams? Heh, show them how much they WOULD get if it wasn't for
SpamAssassin. :)
spam-stats from one of the
I just installed SA last night, and everything appeared to have installed
fine and I go to run the test and I keep getting this. I've looked through
the archives to see if this has been answered but I can't seem to find
anything.
Much Appreciated!
little:/installs/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55#
1 - 100 of 139 matches
Mail list logo
