Simon Byrnand wrote:
Huh ? Of course Sendmail can refuse mail for non-existant user accounts. :)
This happens automatically for the "primary" domain name the server is
configured with, but if you're doing multiple virtual domains using the
virtusertable file then you need a wildcard entry per d
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 21:54 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
> >On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> >
> > > At 18:22 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
> > >
> > > >I just had a piece of spam slip through with no X-header. When I saved it,
> > > >and manually ran i
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 07:40:03PM -0700, Clint Byrum wrote:
> Hey guys. I just subscribed to the list, but have been reading the
> archives for a while. I'm aware of some of the other spamd stat
> reporters out there. I have written two more. One, spamdstats, is a perl
> script that reports stats
At 21:07 15/06/03 -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 03:25 PM Monday, 6/16/2003, Simon Byrnand wrote -=>
What happens without -H is that when spamd does a setuid() to another
user (other than root) the environment variable $HOME which is passed to
helper apps like razor is still pointing to root's home di
At 03:25 PM Monday, 6/16/2003, Simon Byrnand wrote -=>
What happens without -H is that when spamd does a setuid() to another user
(other than root) the environment variable $HOME which is passed to helper
apps like razor is still pointing to root's home directory. Of course
razor can't save its
I like it. Another respondant mentioned graphing the scores as well. Someone
else on this list gave me a script they use to plot scores with gnuplot (see
attachment). I'd rather have it in an RRD database, though, but I haven't
gotten around to porting it yet. I'd be interested in seeing your
On 15 Jun 2003 19:40:03 -0700, you wrote:
>I'm cleaning up the code for both for a full release. If you want to
>check out the graphs from spamrrd though, you can go to
>
>http://spamaps.org/spamrrd/
I like it. Another respondant mentioned graphing the scores as well. Someone
else on this list
At 16:38 14/06/03 +0100, Mathew Hendry wrote:
Jim Ford wrote:
> If auto-learn is on (default setting), is there any point in putting
> correctly identified spam and ham through sa-learn? Is the only use
> for sa-learn to teach SA when spam or ham is incorrectly identified?
No, auto-learn learns on
At 20:19 15/06/03 -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
At 08:19 AM Monday, 6/16/2003, Simon Byrnand wrote -=>
> Does anyone have any ideas as to why it would take 3 seconds to do the
> following:
>
> Jun 14 07:28:29 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: entering helper-app run mode
> Jun 14 07:28:32 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug
At 08:19 AM Monday, 6/16/2003, Simon Byrnand wrote -=>
> Does anyone have any ideas as to why it would take 3 seconds to do the
> following:
>
> Jun 14 07:28:29 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: entering helper-app run mode
> Jun 14 07:28:32 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: Using results from Razor v2.34
>
> If I
>
>
>If you like, please let me know what you would do to improve it based on
>that. I should be ready to release code in the next couple of days
>(honestly its alright, but I need to get copyright messages and a decent
>README into it).
>
Clint,
That looks pretty darn awesome!!! It's amazing just
Hey guys. I just subscribed to the list, but have been reading the
archives for a while. I'm aware of some of the other spamd stat
reporters out there. I have written two more. One, spamdstats, is a perl
script that reports stats by user, and by date. The other, spamrrd,
makes graphs of spam over t
same problem with me but the email is below 256kb. Any idea to fix it plz.
> At 18:22 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> >I just had a piece of spam slip through with no X-header. When I saved
it,
> >and manually ran it through "spamc -R" it got something like a 17.
> >
> >By now I've run ten
At 21:54 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 18:22 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> >I just had a piece of spam slip through with no X-header. When I saved it,
> >and manually ran it through "spamc -R" it got something like a 17.
> >
> >By now I've
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 18:22 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> >I just had a piece of spam slip through with no X-header. When I saved it,
> >and manually ran it through "spamc -R" it got something like a 17.
> >
> >By now I've run tens of thousands of messages through
At 11:30 15/06/03 +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>Ah. Does this make any difference to putting your MTA in a
proxy-forwarding DMZ? Don't know what provision
>Sendmail has for defeating dictionary attacks and suchlike, but both
Postfix 2.0 and Exim 4.20 can completely
>defeat them, so using Fetchmai
Hi,
Can someone tell me if there is an upper limit on the maximum number of
email addresses per line (seperated with spaces) for the whitelist_from and
blacklist_from directives ? The docs don't seem to specify any kind of limit...
Regards,
Simon
--
On Mon, 9 Jun 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 07:53 PM 6/9/2003 -0400, Jose M.Herrera wrote:
> >On Friday 06 June 2003 11:29, Germán D. Staltari wrote:
> > > It could be global or for each user. Better results when is applied for
> > > each user.
> >
> >How I do that?... I know train bayes but for
At 18:22 15/06/03 -0400, Jack Gostl wrote:
I just had a piece of spam slip through with no X-header. When I saved it,
and manually ran it through "spamc -R" it got something like a 17.
By now I've run tens of thousands of messages through spamc/spamd and,
except for OS crashes, this is the first o
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 05:44:40PM +0200, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> I'll do a trade with you ("swap you this for that"). You tell me how
> you'd whitelist a given ldap alias list with Sendmail, and I'll tell you
> how I'd do it with SA-Exim 4.20/3.0 and with Postfix 2.0.12 (dunno yet,
> cos I never
I just had a piece of spam slip through with no X-header. When I saved it,
and manually ran it through "spamc -R" it got something like a 17.
By now I've run tens of thousands of messages through spamc/spamd and,
except for OS crashes, this is the first one I've seen that was obviously
not proces
> Does anyone have any ideas as to why it would take 3 seconds to do the
> following:
>
> Jun 14 07:28:29 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: entering helper-app run mode
> Jun 14 07:28:32 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: Using results from Razor v2.34
>
> If I turn Razor2 off, I get times of .5 to 1.5 seconds. Oth
Today the only spam which slipped thru was a short one with some URLs in
HTML and then this at the end (see below):
I think this is not only trying to trick Bayes in thinking it's ham but
also tries to spoil the Bayes ham recognition if I teach that message as
spam to sa-learn because Bayes wil
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony, I don't know what you mean. But if you took any offense from my
reply it was definitely not meant this way, sorry.
Kai,
Course I didn't take offense at *anything* you have said, say now or
will say in the future. I don't know what this is about; quoting could
help jog m
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
Tony, I don't know what you mean. But if you took any offense from my
reply it was definitely not meant this way, sorry.
Kai,
Course I didn't take offense at *anything* you have said, say now or
will say in the future. I don't know what this is about; quoting could
help jog
At 12:15 PM Sunday, 6/15/2003, Theo Van Dinter wrote -=>
> Jun 14 07:28:29 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: entering helper-app run mode
> Jun 14 07:28:32 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: Using results from Razor v2.34
>
> Could this be related to cpu speed or dns or my setup?
"entering" happens when Razor is ab
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 09:37:46AM -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
> Would it help do you think if I put the discovery server entries in the
> hosts file?
No. The debug lines showed that the 3 seconds was the amount of time
the razor server took to respond with the razor servers you should use.
Name look
On Sun, Jun 15, 2003 at 08:28:49AM -0700, Ed Kasky wrote:
> Does anyone have any ideas as to why it would take 3 seconds to do the
> following:
>
> Jun 14 07:28:29 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: entering helper-app run mode
> Jun 14 07:28:32 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: Using results from Razor v2.34
>
David Luyer wrote:
Of course it can. sendmail can do anything. Never believe anyone
who tells you there's something sendmail can't do.
Well, well, well.
It does it by default if it's the final delivery host,
Good. So now I know that.
I don't know Sendmail at all, but as I said, both SA-Exim 4.
Does anyone have any ideas as to why it would take 3 seconds to do the
following:
Jun 14 07:28:29 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: entering helper-app run mode
Jun 14 07:28:32 yoda2 spamd[1289]: debug: Using results from Razor v2.34
If I turn Razor2 off, I get times of .5 to 1.5 seconds. Otherwise it's
Tony, I don't know what you mean. But if you took any offense from my
reply it was definitely not meant this way, sorry.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.winware.org
--
> Also, both can be configured to refuse mail for non-existent user
> accounts. Which I don't believe Sendmail can.
Of course it can. sendmail can do anything. Never believe anyone
who tells you there's something sendmail can't do.
It does it by default if it's the final delivery host, if it's
dGenus Mailing List wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist_from.cf
What is teh format of this file... one entry per line???
It's exactly the same as you'd stuff into your user_prefs or local.cf
file. In fact, it's simply an extension of both the latter. The only
point of having it at all, is to
Colin Dean wrote:
Sorry, in trying to be brief in my original posting, I probably wasn't
clear enough.
All you had to do is to explain "why."
Before using SA, we'd set up a regular cron job to send the relevant
data from MySQL into an OpenLDAP directory so that we could then use
this easily as a
Kai Schaetzl wrote:
That's exactly what I was saying (perhaps I'd misunderstood Tom.) I was
trying to say that teaching it spam under the level that one has defined
as being spam - even if it is spam - amounts to defeating one's own
purpose.
No, that's exactly what Tom was questioning and after
Jim Ford wrote:
I think it's what's known as a "badly kept secret." Unless you count the
many and frequent postings on this list, pointing it out. Should be in a
FAQ somewhere (and is, perhaps :), it isn't in 'man spamd', 'man
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf',though. It's probably in the code in the P
Hi there,
Please bear with me as I'm trying to determine if Spam
Assassin will do what I need it to, I have a couple of simple
questions.
I am running a Mac OSX 10.2.6 'client' machine, using Tenon's
iTools (web/ftp/mail etc...) package for serving. We have around 25
users hanging off this ma
Tony Earnshaw wrote:
/etc/mail/spamassassin/whitelist_from.cf
What is teh format of this file... one entry per line???
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay
Great deals on office technology -- on eBay now! Click here:
http://adfarm.media
On 15 Jun 2003 Brad Marcoux ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
>
> The only problem is that the mailboxes it's dumping mail into are
> unreadable by pine - specifically, the mailbox shows up as one HUGE
> message rather than as individual messages. I haven't encountered this
> problem on any of the lists:
39 matches
Mail list logo
