Hi Klaus!
> Hi List,
>
> I have an older Redhat 7.2 mail/web server and want to
> install SpamAssassin.
>
> On this system I cannot upgrade to perl 5.6.1...
> Some other tries didn't work.
>
> Is someone here who has some experiences about this?
> Or solved this problem?
>
> I read about the
Jason Haar wrote:
I'm trying out the new RBLPLUS code in 2.60cvs, and get the following error
on *some* RBL-matched msgs:
debug: RBL: success for 5 of 6 queries
Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 305,
line 412.
debug:
David B Funk wrote:
OK, I'm sorry I wasn't clear enough about the environment. The AOL client
was using a web browser (HTTP not SMTP) to sent the message, via a
webmail (HTTP-2-IMAP/SMTP) gateway (running 'IMP'). I understand about
requiring dial-up clients using their ISP for SMTP transactions, b
Hello,
I am using SpamAssassin system-wide (I use qmail, so I run spamassassin in
place of qmail-queue). It's great, but it often consumes a lot of
resources (I see processes of SA that consume 200+ MB of memory etc.).
I suppose that this is because of large messages (e.g. with attachments).
Is t
Hello,
Before I re-invent the wheel, has anyone added support for amavisd-new
logs to spamstats? (http://www.gryzor.com/tools/#spamstats)
Nice tool (merci Vincent) but doesn't seem to grok log entries generated
by amavisd-new.
If no one has yet, I'll do it shortly.
Greets,
_Alain_
---
Ok, I think I see what you man here - saying that I could use this
procmail filter... and I could then blacklist fimble.com so any external
mail from fimble.com gets blocked. My issue still is though that
fimble.com is whitelisted, so blacklisting it sets the score back to 0,
and not 100 like
On Sunday, Jul 13th 2003 at 16:52 -0400, quoth Joe Nicholson:
=>I just started using spamassassin via Saproxy. It's great. Much of my spam
=>comes from china (chinanet etc..) ISP's whos IP addresses resolve to .cn
=>domains. Is there any way to set this as an item to be tested and marked. I
=>g
--On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 6:31 AM +0200 Klaus Pforte
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have an older Redhat 7.2 mail/web server and want to install SpamAssassin.
>
> On this system I cannot upgrade to perl 5.6.1...
What prevents the Perl upgrade? I updated to perl-5.6.1-34.99.6 to get the
newer M
At 12:52 14/07/03 -0600, Mike Mills wrote:
I am experiencing weird and inconsistent behavior with the auto_learn
feature of spamassassin. I set the following in my local.cf file:
auto_learn 1
auto_learn_threshold_spam 4.3
auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.0
In my user_prefs I have:
required_hits
Hi,
> yes. we use the command line vexira product in conjunction with
> amavisd-new to manage calling it and SA. If you bought the vexira mail
> server version, you have to daisy chain it with amavisd-new,
> which is a lot of duplicated effort.
I'm also using the command line version of Vexira
Hi Steve,
I found a link some time ago.
http://www.openhandhome.com/howtosa.html
I have not tried it yet myself as I have SA running on my Linux box which
relays for Exchange. I was hoping it might help you.
--Larry
---
This SF.net email
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Justin,
SB> At 16:58 17/07/03 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>>> My hunch is that auto-learning waters down the effectiveness of
>>> manual training. ...
>>However, I'd say at that kind of volume, there really isn't much need
>>to keep auto-learni
Robert Menschel writes:
>Wouldn't this be easily accomplished by just increasing the auto-learn
>safety margin? Raise the score at which spam is auto-learned, and lower
>the score at which ham is auto-learned, and you'll auto-learn fewer
>messages. If I understand how this works, the manual teach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Michael,
Thursday, July 17, 2003, 12:44:57 PM, you wrote:
MW> How about setting up a service where we can send an email to
MW> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will get back an
MW> email that should trigger your SA viagra tests. I know there are
MW>
I am experiencing weird and inconsistent behavior with the auto_learn
feature of spamassassin. I set the following in my local.cf file:
auto_learn 1
auto_learn_threshold_spam 4.3
auto_learn_threshold_nonspam 0.0
In my user_prefs I have:
required_hits 4.3
It seems that not all of the
Title: Message
I have a list of
specific trusted addresses in my whitelist, but it still won't autolearn from
them. Why not? Their scores are quite negative, way below -2, but it still won't
autolearn from them. It looks like it's ignoring the whitelist when checking
whether or not it should
--On Wednesday, July 16, 2003 9:56 AM -0400 Chris Santerre
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for your access file Pat!! Your list was great help. I wanted to
let you know how I'm handling this as it may be of some help.
Some quick info:
The access file you sent me with blocked IPs had some class
Hi!
there are so many questions about spamassassin
and attachment filtering, but no usable answer.
May be you should put that answer in faq...
how can I filter attachment headers, why my
rules don't work?
full UNSAFE_ATTACHMENT /Content-
(Disposition|Type):.+file.+="?.+.(pif|
com|scr|ln
sorin wrote:
> Can anybody tell me what is this message about and why I wasn't
> getting this message only now after a month of running spamassassin ?
Maybe you changed your syslog.conf file recently so those messages
go now to your console?
ciao
Klaus
Heads up to all qmail users out there...
- Forwarded message from John Brown -
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 10:34:00 -0600
From: John Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: qmail smtp-auth bug allows open relay
seems that there are installs of the smtp-auth patch
to qmail th
--On Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:30 PM -0700 Marek Dohojda
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> it seems a lot of resumes are marked spam!
It would be useful to build a corpus of these for GA training. Are they
confidential? Are they triggering particular rules?
-
I just started using spamassassin via Saproxy. It's great. Much of my spam
comes from china (chinanet etc..) ISP's whos IP addresses resolve to .cn
domains. Is there any way to set this as an item to be tested and marked. I
get no legitimate mail from servers in China. Does spamassassin as
down
Hi all,
I am new with spamassassin.
I try to install it :
I got Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55.tar.gz
I untared it
I jumped to the path Mail-SpamAssassin-2.55
I checked INSTALL file
I launched perl Makefile.PL
$ perl Makefile.PL
Checking if your kit is complete...
Looks good
Warning: I could not locate
Hi List,
I have an older Redhat 7.2 mail/web server and want to install SpamAssassin.
On this system I cannot upgrade to perl 5.6.1...
Some other tries didn't work.
Is someone here who has some experiences about this?
Or solved this problem?
I read about the 7.3 rpms and that some changes in a
I'm trying out the new RBLPLUS code in 2.60cvs, and get the following error
on *some* RBL-matched msgs:
debug: RBL: success for 5 of 6 queries
Can't use an undefined value as an ARRAY reference at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm line 305,
line 412.
debug: cleaned up kid 64
No doubt - like the rest of you I HATE spam, to that end I have been using
SpamCop.net for the last 6 months or so. Then I read Consumer Reports and
found out about SAproxy - just what I was looking for! It installed in 5
minutes like an earlier emailer said - but it doesn't work, I followed all
of
> "WN" == William Nichols writes:
WN> ANyone using vexira antivirus with spamassassin and Postfix? If so can you
WN> respond I have a couple of questions to ask, namely the order that you have
WN> things happening, and how you go about the process.
yes. we use the command line vexira produ
Was testing out our recent install of Squirrelmail (web based IMAP MUA)
and noticed the SA results:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.0 required=6.0
tests=MSG_ID_ADDED_BY_MTA_3,NO_REAL_NAME,USER_AGENT
version=2.50
Squirrelmail generates its own Message-ID - I didn't look in the source
to
Hi List,
I have an older Redhat 7.2 mail/web server and want to install SpamAssassin.
On this system I cannot upgrade to perl 5.6.1...
Some other tries didn't work.
Is someone here who has some experiences about this?
Or solved this problem?
Thanks in advance,
greetings from Black Forrest, Germ
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Howdy,
Has anyone integrated SpamAssassin into Postfix such that any high
scoring spam can be rejected during MTA rather than this process of
simply categorizing?
I use lots of RBL's and header_check/body_check to reject during the
delivery process..
Great product! However, I am not clear on how to help SAproxy learn from my
spam that made it through. I clicked on the election "automatically
learn..." during configuration, however, I am wondering how I teach it to
catch the spam that it missed. Do I leave all the spam I receive in the
spam f
At 17:19 17/07/03 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
Simon Byrnand writes:
> What I was starting to think about, is maybe there could be a different
> weighting for auto-learning as compared to manual learning ?
>
> EG, the ability to give manual learning a lot stronger weight.
>
> I'm not sure how you'd
Mike Staver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'm seeing a new kind of spam issue this week - where these evil, evil
> bastards are now sending me mail from some made up user @fimble.com
I solved this issue at a site, by only selectively scanning messages
(using procmail).
Procmail would only call s
Simon Byrnand writes:
> What I was starting to think about, is maybe there could be a different
> weighting for auto-learning as compared to manual learning ?
>
> EG, the ability to give manual learning a lot stronger weight.
>
> I'm not sure how you'd go about that exactly, but maybe a --weigh
At 16:58 17/07/03 -0700, Justin Mason wrote:
>My hunch is that auto-learning waters down the effectiveness of manual
>training. Our Bayes database is now up to nearly 60,000 spam and 60,000
>ham, and I suspect that the token numbers for common words are quite large,
>therefore training on individ
On Friday 18 July 2003 01:38 CET Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I should point out that Envelope-To is not a standard header, its being
> added to the messages by your mailserver, and your mailserver happens to
> rely on that header after the message is filtered by SA, to know what to
> do with the message
Simon Byrnand writes:
>At 14:16 17/07/03 -0400, Barry McLarnon wrote:
>>On Jul 16, 2003 09:34 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote:
>> > Anybody have any suggestions why almost all the ham I manually
>> > train won't budge below BAYES_30 ?
>>
>>I think you should suggest to your correspondents that they become
you can turn on log all spam in your spamassassin tho. and you'll see stuff
in your /var/log/maillog
that's not too bad...
-Original Message-
From: YoloIts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 4:28 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Spamassassin log file
Doe
Hi All,
I tried to get amavis-new going with spamassassin but got a little bogged
down when it came to reconfiguring sendmail (call me lazy or dumb or
whatever). i tried MailScanner and it was _absolutly_ brilliant. all i had
to do what basically untar and run ./install.sh
it did all the good
At 16:17 17/07/03 -0500, Todd Schuldt wrote:
I
have found out through other sources that SA strips out the envelope-to
header when it creates its new message when report-safe is turned on why
in heaven does it do that Its not like SA needs to strip it out
in order to change the message&.
At 15:29 17/07/03 -0500, David B Funk wrote:
If you look closely at the headers, you'll see that the first
'Received:' header is tagged as using HTTP (not SMTP) protocol.
Received: from localhost (webmail2-maint.its.uiowa.edu [128.255.56.154])
by day.its.uiowa.edu (8.12.9/8.12.9/ns-mx
On Friday 18 July 2003 01:08 CET Scott A Crosby wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:55:06 +0200, "Malte S. Stretz" writes:
> > Found it in perlrun. I'm currently doing some runs, but till now no
> > problems. I can't think of any code in there which relys on the
> > ordering on hashes anyway...
>
> Tha
At 14:16 17/07/03 -0400, Barry McLarnon wrote:
On Jul 16, 2003 09:34 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Anybody have any suggestions why almost all the ham I manually
> train won't budge below BAYES_30 ?
I think you should suggest to your correspondents that they become
more literate. :-) I just took a lo
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 00:55:06 +0200, "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Found it in perlrun. I'm currently doing some runs, but till now no
> problems. I can't think of any code in there which relys on the ordering on
> hashes anyway...
Thats what they thought, until the fireworks b
On Friday 18 July 2003 00:14 CET Scott A Crosby wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:26:46 +0200, "Malte S. Stretz" writes:
> > *sigh* So I've got to compile another Perl. I'll have a try. But could
> > give a short explanation (or pointer) on how to use it? The second mail
> > you referred to uses diff
Yorkshire Dave <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > :0fw
> > * < 256000
> > * ! ^X-Spam-Status:
> > | spamc
>
> That will work, but if everyone starts doing it then spammers will start
> forging X-Spam-Status lines into their spam.
I suggest this:
:0fw
* < 256000
* ! ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
At 12:52 17/07/03 -0500, Scott A Crosby wrote:
I will make my best effort to inform you developers directly, but the
more hoops I have to go through, the less likely that I will... and
I'm probably not the only one.
What hoops ? You're already subscribed to the list or you wouldn't be able
to se
I moved the directory and ran cvs I then built and compiled. I did not see a
new Utils.pm install. is it in the cvs package?
Do I need to cpan the cvs?
--john
-Original Message-
From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 21:26:46 +0200, "Malte S. Stretz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thursday 17 July 2003 20:56 CET Scott A Crosby wrote:
> > In any case, if 5.8.1 it goes out with the fix, its going to be
> > interesting how many latent bugs the fix exposes. The perl core has
> > fixed 4 so fa
On Friday 18 July 2003 00:01 CET Hill, John wrote:
> Here you go
> (Line 154) ${$_}{untaint_var($k)} = untaint_var(${$_}{$k});
Ah, that's indeed my code :o) And now I know how there can be an undef.
Thanks
Malte
P.S.: I though you were using 2.60-cvs from some Slackware repository,
ruling
Here you go
unless (ref) {
/^(.*)$/;
return $1;
}
elsif (ref eq 'ARRAY') {
@{$_} = map { $_ = untaint_var($_) } @{$_};
return @{$_} if wantarray;
}
elsif (ref eq 'HASH') {
foreach my $k (keys %{$_}) {
(Line 154) ${$_}{untaint_var($k)} = untaint_var(${$_}{$k});
I have the latest (I think cvs) I could delete the directory and let it
update it all?
It is the %{$_} weird?
--john
-Original Message-
From: Malte S. Stretz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Hill, John
Subject: Re: spamd 2.60-cvs
On Thursday 17 July 2003 23:29 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> Hill, John writes:
> >Error on start up:
> >Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at
> >/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/Spamassassin/Util.pm line 154
>
> not an error, just a warning -- nothing serious, but should probably
I messed up and did not reply all (just a habit)
Actually, if you want to have a black list (rbl) you can
find rbldns (part of the package djbdns) found at
djbdns.com that works very well and is very fast.
Certainly much faster than an Access db, MySql db
et al.
We use it and have complete cont
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 02:32 PM, Malte S. Stretz wrote:
On Thursday 17 July 2003 21:44 CET Michael Weber wrote:
How about setting up a service where we can send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will get back an
email that should trigger your SA viagra tests. I know there are test
mes
I'm seeing a new kind of spam issue this week - where these evil, evil
bastards are now sending me mail from some made up user @fimble.com - so
Spam Assassin automagically assumes it's clean by assingning it a score
of -100 when it comes from fimble.com - and then all the tests get run,
and it
David B Funk writes:
>On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
>
>> David B Funk wrote:
>>
>> > For example, in the attached message the source was an AOL
>> > dialup "AC826956.ipt.aol.com [172.130.105.86]" which hit
>> > 6 RBLs ;() (with 'dnsbl.njabl.org' being added TWICE).
>>
>> You don't seem
Was just some incorrect paths. :) I'll update the doc.
Greg
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:15:24 -0700
From: Greg Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Interesting...empty message returned.
Hi all,
Here's an interesting one...
Using my own docs (avai
I have found out through other sources
that SA strips out the envelope-to header when it creates it’s new
message when report-safe is turned on – why in heaven does it do
that It’s not like SA needs to strip it out in order to change
the message….
Todd
-Original Message
On Thursday, July 17, 2003, at 04:26 PM, Nix wrote:
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered drunkenly:
but by doing sa-learn, one has the option to skip rebuilding the bayes
database after the scan -- which has significantly reduced my
execution time and resources used
spamassassin -r doe
Thanks
It just started with the last two cvs upgrades.
--John
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, July 17, 2003 4:30 PM
To: Hill, John
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamd 2.60-cvs
Hill, John writes:
>Error on start up:
Hill, John writes:
>Error on start up:
>
>Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at
>/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/Spamassassin/Util.pm line 154
not an error, just a warning -- nothing serious, but should probably
be fixed. Malte, if you throw in lots of "if (defined(foo))"
Hi all,
Here's an interesting one...
Using my own docs (available on the Documentation page on
SpamAssassin.org), I've set up Postfix+SpamAssassin site-wide on a
number of machines (Debian Woody and Redhat 9).
Today I went to do another machine and when emails are sent to it they
come out empty,
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 03:51:00PM -0500, Hill, John wrote:
> Error on start up:
>
> Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at
> /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/Spamassassin/Util.pm line 154
>
> Latest spamd-cvs Slackware 8.1 perl 5.8.0 kernel 2.4.21.
>
> It works but I get th
I recently installed Postfix 2 RBL checks. I have been watching my mail log
looking for a reject. I know the tests are working since spamcop was down for
a while and I got a warning message in my log.
I think I understand what is happening, but would appreciate a confirmation.
Postfix checks the c
It is very difficult for me to believe that Postfix or SpamAssassin would
chew up the body of messages. Are you using anything to filter like
Procmail? Is it possible that the sender is the problem?
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
Error on start up:
Use of uninitialized value in scalar assignment at
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/Spamassassin/Util.pm line 154
Latest spamd-cvs Slackware 8.1 perl 5.8.0 kernel 2.4.21.
It works but I get this message when I stop then start it.
I have looked in the docs and the arc
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Aldo Mari wrote:
> Thanks...but I have understood the theory ..but how I can create a DNSBL ..please
> give me some link or idea to howto and how I could permit to spamassassin to connect
> to my own DNSBL..
> thanks
> - Original Message -
> From: Ernest W. Lesse
At 01:47 PM 7/17/2003 -0600, Eric wrote:
when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors.
What is the best way to install digest::sha1
from cpan it hangs on ftp
If CPAN's ftp is hanging, you probably need passive mode to get through a
firewall..
one site with a bit of reference on how to d
At 02:44 PM 7/17/2003 -0500, Michael Weber wrote:
How about setting up a service where we can send an email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will get back an
email that should trigger your SA viagra tests. I know there are test
messages that you can send though manually, but this would be a quick
way
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Tony Earnshaw wrote:
> David B Funk wrote:
>
> > For example, in the attached message the source was an AOL
> > dialup "AC826956.ipt.aol.com [172.130.105.86]" which hit
> > 6 RBLs ;() (with 'dnsbl.njabl.org' being added TWICE).
>
> You don't seem to be studying what is reporte
On Thursday 17 July 2003 21:44 CET Michael Weber wrote:
> How about setting up a service where we can send an email to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will get back an
> email that should trigger your SA viagra tests. I know there are test
> messages that you can send though manually, but this would b
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, [EMAIL PROTECTED] muttered drunkenly:
> but by doing sa-learn, one has the option to skip rebuilding the bayes
> database after the scan -- which has significantly reduced my
> execution time and resources used
>
> spamassassin -r doesn't seem to do that
spamassassin -r alway
At 11:57 AM 7/17/2003 -0700, YoloIts wrote:
Does Spamassassin keep a log file and where is it located?
In general no, although depending on how you are set up spamd may be using
syslog to log some information. It will by default log using the facility
mail. What file that winds up in is dependant
On Thursday 17 July 2003 21:33 CET Michael Weber wrote:
> I have a pid file running with my SA. It is a very minor hack to the
> /etc/init.d/spamd file. Look for the two lines that reference
> /var/run/spamd.pid and add them to your spamd (or spamassassin) init
> file.
>
> case "$1" in
> start)
At 12:06 PM 7/17/2003 -0700, John Birkhead wrote:
Hi,
I installed SA 2.55 along with Razor2 earlier this week and I am
going through the process of fine tuning by using sa-learn etc.
I was looking through the tests performed and noticed that
"RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_n_n" tests give a score of 0.001
Good afternoon, Knom,
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, knom wrote:
Every mail from this mailing list includes unsubscribe information
in the headers. Please look there for the URL to use to unsubscribe.
Cheers,
- Bill
-
Most of us know about the very helpful virus echo service by
mimesweeper. (If you don't, send an empty email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will get back an email containing
the virus test file called eicar.com. VERY useful for testing e-mail
anti-virus setups.)
How about setting up a service wher
when I try to install digest-sha1 I am getting errors.
What is the best way to install digest::sha1
from cpan it hangs on ftp
from source it wont pass the tests 1/16 failed
Eric
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMwar
On Thu, Jul 17, 2003 at 12:06:19PM -0700, John Birkhead wrote:
> I was looking through the tests performed and noticed that
> "RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_n_n" tests give a score of 0.001 for each score through
> 100%. Given what I know (which may not be a lot) this means that even a 90%
> certainty of spam wo
I have a pid file running with my SA. It is a very minor hack to the
/etc/init.d/spamd file. Look for the two lines that reference
/var/run/spamd.pid and add them to your spamd (or spamassassin) init
file.
case "$1" in
start)
# Start daemon.
echo -n "Starting spamd: "
d
At 7/17/03 11:21 AM , Justin Mason wrote:
>1) Have spamd re-read local.cf when it receives a HUP signal, rather
> that having to be stopped and restarted
Yep, that'll be in for 2.60.
And there was much rejoicing!
--Kai MacTane
On Thursday 17 July 2003 20:56 CET Scott A Crosby wrote:
> In any case, if 5.8.1 it goes out with the fix, its going to be
> interesting how many latent bugs the fix exposes. The perl core has
> fixed 4 so far, and identified at least two external packages that
> break their self-tests.
>
> SA, bei
IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
Is there a setting I missed either in CGP, scanspam.sh or spamassassin/local.cf?
---
System Red Hat 7.3/Communigate Pro 3.5.9
Test method: Personal account on giant.net using pine
to send mail test message with +5.00 score. Local domain address in TO:
field.
On Thursday 17 July 2003 20:21 CET Justin Mason wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >1) Have spamd re-read local.cf when it receives a HUP signal, rather
> > that having to be stopped and restarted
>
> Yep, that'll be in for 2.60.
But only in Perl 5.6.1 and later -- I didn't get it to work unde
Does Spamassassin keep a log file and where is it located?
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: VM Ware
With VMware you can run multiple operating systems on a single machine.
WITHOUT REBOOTING! Mix Linux / Windows / Novell virtual machines at
Hi,
I installed SA 2.55 along with Razor2 earlier this week and I am
going through the process of fine tuning by using sa-learn etc.
I was looking through the tests performed and noticed that
"RAZOR2_CF_RANGE_n_n" tests give a score of 0.001 for each score through
100%. Given what I know
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 14:22:56 -0400, Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > "SAC" == Scott A Crosby writes:
>
> SAC> that list been set up to deny non-subscribers from posting. And Perl
> SAC> is being changed to be robust against the hash table attack we
> SAC> discussed.
>
> And broke
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003, Kristian Koehntopp wrote:
>
> Is there a mailing list that deals with SMTP policy issues, or are there
> other ressources in that direction (documents, FAQs and the like?). What do
> you recommend.
Try UseNet News groups:
DNS issues:
comp.protocols.tcp-ip.domains
Hi,
whitelist_from and blacklist_from in the users pref's file, either a
flat file or in MySQL
Regards,
Rick
Ernest W. Lessenger wrote:
Does SpamAssassin already have, or has somebody created that I can use,
a per-recipient black/whitelist. What I need to do is allow customers to
add addres
Hi, it could be possible to share bayes db using
NFS among a couple of servers?
TIA
German
> "SAC" == Scott A Crosby writes:
SAC> that list been set up to deny non-subscribers from posting. And Perl
SAC> is being changed to be robust against the hash table attack we
SAC> discussed.
And broke mod_perl along the way! ;-(
Anyhow, it seems this list is now closed to non-member posts,
Our Postfix/Spamassassin server has been working well for a few weeks, with
one exception. We are receiving legitimate emails from associates that show
up completely blank. The to field lists "undisclosed recipients" and the
body is blank. The from field accurately reflects who the message came
fro
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>Sorry if this has already been broached, but this seems like it would be a
>great idea and not too difficult to implement (but I could be way off):
>
>1) Have spamd re-read local.cf when it receives a HUP signal, rather
> that having to be stopped and restarted
Yep,
From: Tim Litwiller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I have been running mail servers for several of our clients with
spamassassin for several months. Now a client that has an exchange server
want to clean up thier email but pass the mail thru to the exchange server.
I have seen several discussions the le
From: "Greg Cirino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| > Can I blacklist everyone and setup a whitelist of domains?
black_list_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why not just use TMDA?
Chris Berry
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Systems Administrator
JM Associates
"The number of the beast vi vi vi." --Delexa Jones
__
On Jul 16, 2003 09:34 pm, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Anybody have any suggestions why almost all the ham I manually
> train won't budge below BAYES_30 ?
I think you should suggest to your correspondents that they become
more literate. :-) I just took a look at the ham in my inbox... of
160 messages
I've been running a Bayesian filter at my company about since Paul Graham
published his paper. Lack of ham will result in some false positives where
messages that are not spam are marked incorrectly as spam. There is a
diminishing point of return to adding ham, but I haven't found it yet. I do
k
On Thu, 17 Jul 2003 09:45:47 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Justin Mason) writes:
> Scott A Crosby writes:
> >I just had a 100+ message thread on perl5-porters discussing the
> >impact of my recent research on perl. I would not have had that had
> >that list been set up to deny non-subscribers from pos
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
