Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

Michael W. Cocke wrote: > Just FYI, AOL is doing reverse DNS and won't accept incoming email if > they don't approve of the sending IP address.. as in, they won't > accept messages from my domain because I use dyndns and not a static > IP. It is probably not that you don't have reverse DNS. It i

[SAtalk] [SAdev] SpamAssassin 2.60 rc5 released

Pick it up from: http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc5.tar.gz http://SpamAssassin.org/released/Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc5.zip md5sums: f139350d41271ad2858227cd79800eef Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc5.tar.gz 57603fbe604048a870bcec1f1c460765 Mail-SpamAssassin-2.60-rc5.zi

Re: [SAtalk] Tests against envelope sender?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 08:50:12PM -0400, Larry Gilson wrote: > SA only knows what it sees. Normal headers do not include the envelope > sender. How would you get the envelope sender from your MTA to SA? This was discussed recently, ppl can check the archives to see some ways it can be done. I

RE: [SAtalk] Problems getting spamd working with postfix

Hi Jason, > -Original Message- > From: Jason Williams > I have a two scripts located in /usr/local/bin: > the spamfilter script and the reinjection script... > I added the following to my main.cf file: > > content_filter=spamfilter: > > and the following to my master.cf: > > 127.0.0.1

[SAtalk] Infinite-Monkeys

Hey folks. Left the list for a while but re-subscribed 'cause I have a question to ask: I have MailScanner running SA for me on 2 different servers and got everything working VERY well about two months ago. Within the last 3 weeks, both servers, which are secured and protected against open relay

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 04:36:02PM -0400, Steven W. Orr wrote: > that I can just add? Here you are: header __SOBIG_HEADER X-MailScanner =~ /^Found to be clean/ body __SOBIG_BODY /(?:Please s|S)ee the attached file for details/ header __SOBIG_SUB_1Subject =~ /^R

RE: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

Deersoft was bought by NAI. Deersoft made SpamAssassin Pro and SpamAssassin Enterprise products. Justin should be able to tell you for sure but I believe that Deersoft trade marked the specific products and not the SpamAssassin name itself. http://www.cio.com/archive/020103/et_company.html "Dee

[SAtalk] Large message timeouts

I have been using SpamAssassin for a few weeks now and am very satisfied with it. My one significant problem is that I get a Mail Server timeout from my ISP whenever a message being "Spammed" has taken over about one minute to complete. I then have to disable SA and change my Outlook Server setti

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4 - sa-learn errors

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 >Everything seems to be working properly, with the exception of >learning with sa-learn. Dumping the database/magic, etc. works >fine, but calling "sa-learn --spam" results in the following error: >> Insecure dependency in glob while running with

[SAtalk] 'Malformed UTF-8 character' errors

Hello there. I did read the FAQ: *** 4.6. I get 'Malformed UTF-8 character' errors on Red Hat 8, or using perl 5.8.0, with SA 2.43. Perl 5.8 introduces a policy change to using UTF-8 character sets by default, which broke a massive am

[SAtalk] Problems getting spamd working with postfix

Hello everyone. Well, im at about my wits end here trying to figure out why my setup is not working. Im running postfix 2.0.9 and SA 2.55 I followed the procedures at http://www.securitysage.com on how to setup and configure postfix and spamassassin. Im using two scripts for my setup: the usua

RE: [SAtalk] Tests against envelope sender?

SA only knows what it sees. Normal headers do not include the envelope sender. How would you get the envelope sender from your MTA to SA? --Larry > -Original Message- > From: David Hubbard > Do the header tests include the envelope sender? > If so, what is it called? --

[SAtalk] Razor 2.22- 2.36 Taint issue patch

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I followed the instuructions below to patch Razor2's taint problem. The Config.pm patch worked perfectly, but the Core.pm patch failed at hunk 1. Is this an SA issue, or a Razor issue..(i.e. patch created by Razor folks or SA folks)? - --- sta

RE: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

"Covington, Chris" wrote: Somebody should trademark or copyright the SA symbol/brand, if possible, or a for-profit might get away with this then we'd have to change the name of the real thing. WAAAY old news. The main SpamAssassin authors formed Deersoft and trademarked the name. Later, Network

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:46:18PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > They need to follow the PAL/GPL. A "commercial" version is perfectly > fine, assuming they've made changes such that we're a component. They still have to provide the source code along with their binary distribution. If they don'

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook Issues

Please don't post to the list in HTML. I dumped that rule by adding this line to /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: score FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK 0 -- Thomas Cameron, RHCE, CNE, MCSE, MCT Cameron Technical Services, Inc. http://www.camerontech.com/ (512) 454-3200 - Original Message - From: P

Re: [SAtalk] Outlook Issues

Hi Philip, could be that SA do not recognize the signature of office 11 yet and catalogue the evidence as "like office but without being so". best regards, jonathan Philip Bubel wrote: Anybody else having trouble with e-mails being sent from Outlook getting tagged as spam incorrectly. I'm u

RE: [SAtalk] Outlook Issues

I was thinking that, BUT I was having the same problem before I upgraded to Office 11 (using using XP) -Original Message- From: Jonathan G - Mailing List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:17 PM To: Philip Bubel Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Outloo

[SAtalk] Tests against envelope sender?

Do the header tests include the envelope sender? If so, what is it called? Thanks, David --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassass

Re: [SAtalk] MILTER problem with sendmail/spamassassin/mimedefang

McWhirter,Julia wrote: I get the following error when using sendmail Warning: Option: InputMailFilters requires Milter support (-DMILTER) this error means your sendmail is compiled without milter, and you need to recompile with -DMILTER in the configure step ---

Re: [SAtalk] Question on installing SA and using spamd

Hi Jason, comment in line, Jason Williams wrote: Good morning everyone. I wanted to ask a couple of quick questions about installing SA and running spamd. From what i've read, I have two options to install SA: use perl -MCPAN or download the source and install it. My first question is about

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:39:18 -0500, you wrote: >On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 08:13, Michael W. Cocke wrote: >[snip] > >> Pardon me while I expose my ignorance. What's a smarthost, and given >> me by which provider? All I get from my so-called ISP is a wire with >> an IP address, or do you mean dyndns?

[SAtalk] Outlook Issues

Anybody else having trouble with e-mails being sent from Outlook getting tagged as spam incorrectly.  I'm using Office 11, but had the same problem with Office XP.  Here are the two hits I'm getting.    *  3.5 -- Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook  *  0.6 -- Message looks like Outl

[SAtalk] qmail + vpopmail + spamassassin

Hi, I have qmail + vpopmail + tmda + qmail-scanner + clamd on Linux. I'm wanting to integrate spam assassin on a company wide basis. Basically my boss wants all emails in the company to be checked for spam and if SA hits an 8.0 or whatever we decide the email should be discarded and a bounce sen

[SAtalk] Ideal setup for SA

Hi, Right now I have sendmail, spamassassin-milter.c, and spamd running and my flagged mail is dumped in a spam folder by procmail. This alleviated a lot of my spam but more and more seems to get through by the day. Some mail doesn't have the flags saying it was checked by SA at all. My quest

RE: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

-Original Message- >It looks as though the same trademark atty Joseph G Adams has >attempted to register it for deersoft and for network >associates. >I see his phone number is at the bottom of the listing if >anyone is interested: >http://tarr.uspto.gov/servlet/tarr?regser=serial&entry=

Re: [SAtalk] Re: CYGWIN spamc/spamd

Fred I-IS.COM wrote: > Is this because of running SpamD under AS perl? I am planning to run > SpamD under CYGWIN perl. Are there any problems with this setup? I > have it working all except net tests, having trouble getting Net::DNS > to work for CYGWIN... I'm using 2.6rc4 Hi, I do not know i

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 04:24:37PM -0400, Fred I-IS.COM wrote: > That was the point of my post, I was not sure if it was legal to "SELL" an > open-source project. > The free version is for personal / non-commercial use only. They need to follow the PAL/GPL. A "commercial" version is perfectly f

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

It looks as though the same trademark atty Joseph G Adams has attempted to register it for deersoft and for network associates.

RE: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

> -Original Message- > From: Fred I-IS.COM > I know I'd be a little upset if I created an open-source > program and someone packaged it and started to profit from my hard > work! Like the Linux kernel or Webmin? --Larry --- This s

Re: [SAtalk] Re: CYGWIN spamc/spamd

Is this because of running SpamD under AS perl? I am planning to run SpamD under CYGWIN perl. Are there any problems with this setup? I have it working all except net tests, having trouble getting Net::DNS to work for CYGWIN... I'm using 2.6rc4 Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Servic

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

That was the point of my post, I was not sure if it was legal to "SELL" an open-source project. The free version is for personal / non-commercial use only. I know I'd be a little upset if I created an open-source program and someone packaged it and started to profit from my hard work! My point wa

[SAtalk] Tagging MAILER-DAEMON's

Hiya, I'm trying to figure out the best way to tag MAILER-DAEMON double-bounces. We run a few web/mail servers here and they get hammered pretty hard. My AWL and Bayes tests are bringing the score down a lot, which has forced me to make a custom rule that assigns a higher score to the MAILER_DAEM

RE: [SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem

I was running 2.20 (Debian Package). I've since upgraded to 2.55 (source download) and it has fixed my problem. However it created another one. SA is working fine, however it throws about a dozen error messages very similar to the one below in mail.log, each time it checks a message. spamd[2283

Re: [SAtalk] Re: CYGWIN spamc/spamd

Michael Bell wrote: > > Not to take away from your very fine work Klaus, but unless you've > fixed it, your spamd has a serious memory leak (it did for 2.55) > which I reported to you back in July or so. Not too noticeable for > casual POP3, but for a full mail server feed, the machine will > proba

Re: [SAtalk] Can´t learn spam mails with sa-learn

It means that some spammer is using your domain to masquerade from! I've been getting the same thing here. I have sendmail set to send all unknown users' email to a specific username, then procmail dumps everything FROM_MAILER to its own folder. - Burt Bernd Kuhls wrote: Hello, since I a

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

On Monday, Sep 15th 2003 at 12:22 -0700, quoth Andreas Stollar: =>So what is the problem? They packaged it up with some Windows tools and =>made it into a 'SpamAssassin for Dummies' product. I am sure no one on =>*this* list needs that, but for those that do, there is an option. Free =>version

Re: [SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem

At Mon Sep 15 15:39:51 2003, Philip Bubel wrote: > > Hello All, > Having a problem with mail that is tagged as spam. SA is placing a > large block of text (see below) at the start of all messages tagged as spam. > This block plays havoc with HTML messages and messages with attachments. Which

[SAtalk] user_prefs file creation error

When I run the following sa-learn --spam --dir /spamassassin/Maildir/cur I get the following error Failed to create default user preference file /spamassassin/.spamassassin/user_prefs I have tried running the sa-learn command under my username, root, and the spam account username and alway get

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

Fred I-IS.COM wrote: > > Quoted from their page: One more quote: 'SpamAssassin' is a trademark of Network Associates, Inc. Is this correct or wrong? Klaus --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkg

[SAtalk] Re: CYGWIN spamc/spamd

"I have this running on my computer. It works without problem. I need cygwin to run spamc only. SpamD and sa-learn runs with the activestate perl. I changed spamD to run in "serial" mode. The threading does not work with the windows perl. I do not know about the cygwin perl and threading." Not t

RE: [SAtalk] Hashed whitelists

I'm using Postfix as my MTA. I think MIMEDefang uses the Milter filter for Sendmail. Milter I've heard is a great setup but I'm not going back to the darkages of Sendmail. Does anyone know if spamassassin is capable of doing this on its own? Something like: whitelist_from hash:/usr/share/spamassas

Re: [SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

So what is the problem? They packaged it up with some Windows tools and made it into a 'SpamAssassin for Dummies' product. I am sure no one on *this* list needs that, but for those that do, there is an option. Free version also available. Nothing illegal about charging for support/add-ons/enhan

[SAtalk] no spam today uses SA?

Hello, Anyone ever hear of "No Spam Today" mail filtering software?  It boasts that it uses "SpamAssassin" technology. http://www.no-spam-today.com Is it a scam, they are charging money for it!   Quoted from their page: No Spam Today! uses award winning SpamAssassin™ technology to identify and

[SAtalk] Question on installing SA and using spamd

Good morning everyone. I wanted to ask a couple of quick questions about installing SA and running spamd. From what i've read, I have two options to install SA: use perl -MCPAN or download the source and install it. My first question is about perl -MCPAN. I have only used this a few times and

Re: [SAtalk] Not recognizing /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:02:09AM -0700, wells oliver wrote: > The first few lines of my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: > > user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost > user_scores_sql_usernamexxx > user_scores_sql_passwordxxx > user_scores_sql_table

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

On Mon, 2003-09-15 at 08:13, Michael W. Cocke wrote: [snip] > Pardon me while I expose my ignorance. What's a smarthost, and given > me by which provider? All I get from my so-called ISP is a wire with > an IP address, or do you mean dyndns? [snip] Your ISP has an smtp server no? That is the

Re: [SAtalk] Not recognizing /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?

Wells oliver wrote on Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:02:09 -0700 (PDT): > However, the daemon seems to make no attempt at logging into mySQL > You also need to add the parameter for SQL usage to the spamd startup line. That's a mistake I made, too, some time back. Sorry, I don't know it off the head, chec

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

Bob Apthorpe wrote on Sun, 14 Sep 2003 12:09:47 -0500: > http://www.corpit.ru/mjt/proxycheck.html > Thanks! I found the second tool after reading one of the Sobig analyses up to the end. I'll try them out both. Kai -- Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany Get your web at Conactive Internet Services:

[SAtalk] Hashed whitelists

Is it possible to setup a whitelist/blacklist as a hashed file? I would like to setup a site-wide whitelist/blacklist and still have single user control over other settings. Steve --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to gee

RE: [SAtalk] spamd performance

> > If performance is an issue, how about an option like... > > > > HIT_AND_RUN 1 > > > > ...that would cause spamd to stop processing once your threshhold had > > been met? IOW why keep scanning text once the message has been > > identified as spam? I'm sure that I'm missing something here but I'

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

That is correct information, but I too am still seeing a few from one server which has it's date set to March 20th 2003. I wrote a rule to catch mail from that server and I haven't seen anymore since! Frederic Tarasevicius Internet Information Services, Inc. Steve Thomas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13

[SAtalk] amavisd + spamassassin

Hello spamassassin-talk, I'm using FreeBSD 4.7 with amavisd-new-20030616 + SpamAssassin-2.55, chrooted I was trying to use Razor2 and DCC checks together, but I've got the problem: When I'm using only dcc or only razor2, everything is fine,

RE: [SAtalk] All mail hits RCVD_IN_SORBS

-Original Message- > Could very well be that your own mail relay (or that of a common > uplink) is listed in the blacklist. > >We tried using sorbs lookups at the mta level and they consistenly >returned dns lookup errors. I also tried connecting to their website >with no success. I've d

RE: [SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem

I've copied his local.cf file and restarted SA. I still have the same problem. Here's an example of what happens to the e-mails, it completely messes up the HTML. SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results SPAM: 14.1 hits, 7 required; SPAM: * 1.3 -- 'Received:' has 'may be forged' warning SPAM: * 2

RE: [SAtalk] MILTER problem with sendmail/spamassassin/mimedefang

Fixed this used APPENDDEF(`confENVDEF', `-DMILTER') Instead of APPENDDEF(`conf_sendmail_ENVDEF', `-DMILTER') In my site.config.m4 -Original Message- From: McWhirter,Julia Sent: 15 September 2003 16:40 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] MILTER problem with sendmail/spamassassin/m

Re: [SAtalk] MILTER problem with sendmail/spamassassin/mimedefang

The site.config.m4 file looks OK -- are you sure you're using a copy of Sendmail built with those options? Maybe you've got more than one copy floating around on that system. McWhirter,Julia wrote: Having problems integrating spamassassin/mimedefang and sendmail on our external SMTP server. Us

Re: [SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem

I have different setup, including without trouble spam reports in email but as i said without problem. My config es the following: http://www.surestorm.com/data/SpamAssassin_local.cf.html best regards, jonathan Philip Bubel wrote: Hello All, Having a problem with mail that is tagged as spa

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:06:44AM -0700, Steve Thomas wrote: > On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp is rumored to have said: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote: > > > 2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be a few > > > errant worm

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 was hit-and-miss for me

On Fri, 12 Sep 2003, Scott Lambert wrote: -}> Bob Apthorpe suggested that mails over a large limit (100K maybe) get -}> dropped. That's not the problem I'm facing, although now I'll know that if I -}> see a very large mail drop through unprocessed it's not a symptom of this -}> problem. Thanks. -}

Re: [SAtalk] Has anyone written rules for Sobig:F

On Sat, Sep 13, 2003 at 06:57:27PM +0200, Kristian Koehntopp is rumored to have said: > > On Fri, Sep 12, 2003 at 04:34:40PM -0700, Abigail Marshall wrote: > > 2. SobigF expired on September 10th. There may be a few > > errant worms floating around from computers that have their > > dates wrong, b

[SAtalk] Not recognizing /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf?

The first few lines of my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf: user_scores_dsn DBI:mysql:spamassassin:localhost user_scores_sql_usernamexxx user_scores_sql_passwordxxx user_scores_sql_table xxx However, the daemon seems to make no attempt at logging into mySQ

[SAtalk] FW: Large message timeouts

-Original Message- From: Jerry Tye [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:39 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Large message timeouts I have been using SpamAssassin for a few weeks now and am very satisfied with it. My one significant problem is that I get a Mail

[SAtalk] MILTER problem with sendmail/spamassassin/mimedefang

Having problems integrating spamassassin/mimedefang and sendmail on our external SMTP server. Using the following versions Solaris 8 Sendmail 8.12.9 Spamassassin 2.55 Mimedefang 2.35 Procmail 3.22 I get the following error when using sendmail Warning: Option: InputMailFilters requires Milter s

Re: [SAtalk] All mail hits RCVD_IN_SORBS

On Monday 15 September 2003 07:37 am, Ian Southam wrote: > On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:47:59AM -0700 Dan Kohn wrote : > > It's not that big a deal, but every message I have (ham and spam) is > > hitting RCVD_IN_SORBS and getting 0.1 points. Is the rule broken, or is > > there something strange abo

Re: [SAtalk] Skipping RBL checks for authenticated connections

On Sun, 13 Sep 2003, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > Please go ahead and submit a bug. Thanks for your input. Just submitted, Bug #2462 == Chris Candreva -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- (914) 967-7816 WestNet Internet Services of Westchester http://www.

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

Hi, On Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:34:03 +0100 Paul Hutchings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pardon me while I expose my ignorance. What's a smarthost, and given > > me by which provider? All I get from my so-called ISP is a wire with > > an IP address, or do you mean dyndns? > > It's your ISPs outbo

RE: [SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem

I currently am using this setting "report_safe 0" attached is my local.cf file -Original Message- From: Dave Kliczbor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 11:04 AM To: Philip Bubel Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem Philip Bubel wrote: >

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60rc4 - sa-learn errors

Mike Loiterman wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Everything seems to be working properly, with the exception of learning with sa-learn. Dumping the database/magic, etc. works fine, but calling "sa-learn --spam" results in the following error: Insecure dependency in glob

[SAtalk] Tagged Mail Format Problem

Hello All, Having a problem with mail that is tagged as spam. SA is placing a large block of text (see below) at the start of all messages tagged as spam. This block plays havoc with HTML messages and messages with attachments. This is a problem for us when a message gets tagged as spam incorr

Re: [SAtalk] All mail hits RCVD_IN_SORBS

On Sun, Aug 31, 2003 at 11:47:59AM -0700 Dan Kohn wrote : > It's not that big a deal, but every message I have (ham and spam) is > hitting RCVD_IN_SORBS and getting 0.1 points. Is the rule broken, or is > there something strange about my mail? Could very well be that your own mail relay (or that

[SAtalk] disabling spamassassin localy after implementing it globaly?

Hi, I'm running a few clustered servers. On these servers our users have been running spamassassin by means of procmail filtering. Now I've implemented spamassassin tagging on our incomming mail gateway and I want to disable spamassassin on my clustered servers since all mail now is tagged on a "g

RE: [SAtalk] X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY - Turn off check?

You sound like you're having to hold back on the flames Jim :) Daz > -Original Message- > From: Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 15 September 2003 14:23 > To: Spam Assassin > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY - Turn off check? > > > On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:48:14AM +0100

RE: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

> Pardon me while I expose my ignorance. What's a smarthost, and given > me by which provider? All I get from my so-called ISP is a wire with > an IP address, or do you mean dyndns? It's your ISPs outbound smtp server. The idea is you can set your MTA to forward all outbound mail to it and it'

Re: [SAtalk] Running Mailman 2.1.2 with Spamassassin 2.55 and Mimedefang. 2.36

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 23:26:11 +0100, you wrote: >-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >Hash: SHA1 > >Michael W. Cocke wrote: >| I think the odds are against it being either of these 2 programs, but >| I'm losing what's left of my mind Mailman won't send any >| mail No error messages, logs

Re: [SAtalk] X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY - Turn off check?

On Mon, Sep 15, 2003 at 09:48:14AM +0100, Angel Gabriel wrote: > X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY > > How can I turn off the above check? It's adding 2.7 points to my mail, > and making a look of my mail from yahoo groups SPAM. This has been discussed several times over the last couple weeks and is in the arch

Re: [SAtalk] Re: 2.60rc4: overwrite local.cf

On Sunday 14 September 2003 06:17, Daniel Quinlan wrote: > German, > > This should be fixed in the third patch contained in this bug: > > http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2452 > > Please test and let us know if it works. > > Daniel > > P.S. You wouldn't happen to be using Perl 5.0

Re: [SAtalk] Rule for no reverse DNS

On Sat, 13 Sep 2003 17:31:27 +0200, you wrote: >Michael W. Cocke wrote on Fri, 12 Sep 2003 12:52:09 -0400: > >> they won't >> accept messages from my domain because I use dyndns and not a static >> IP. >> > >No problem, use the smarthost given by your provider. That's what it's >for. > > >Kai P

[SAtalk] spamassassin not re-writing mail headers

I have setup spamassassin on a qmail server running qmailscanner. I believe I am using spamassassin 2.55-1.7.3. So far my only gripe is the headers of mail not being rewritten. Here is my user_prefs file as as it deals with the header rewrites: # Whether to change the subject of suspected spam rew

[SAtalk] SA 2.55: customised scores for RBL+ don't seem to work

I have set up the following configuration in my user_prefs: header RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUS rbleval:check_rbl('rblplus', 'rbl-plus.mail-abuse.org.') describe RCVD_IN_RBL_PLUSReceived via RBLed relay, see http://www.mail-abuse.org/rbl/ header X_RBL_OPSrbleval:check_rbl_results_for('rbl

[SAtalk] X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY - Turn off check?

X_OSIRU_OPEN_RELAY How can I turn off the above check? It's adding 2.7 points to my mail, and making a look of my mail from yahoo groups SPAM. Or instead, how can I add some email addresses to a white list, so that they don't get checked for spam? -- * Not everyone is touched by an Angel...

Re: [SAtalk] cygwin + sa?

Fred wrote: > Has anyone on this list installed SA with cygwin? > I'd like to start using spamc + spamd and my only > option appears to be cygwin. Is this safe for production? Hi, I have this running on my computer. It works without problem. I need cygwin to run spamc only. SpamD and sa-learn ru