Hello Mike,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 5:36:27 AM, you wrote:
MC Out of curiosity, what is the highest scoring anyone has seen SA give a
MC message? I had one come through at 37.54 the other day.
I regularly see messages over 40 - for example, yesterday's
log shows:
Subject: [Spam Score: 42.40]
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Sean McCrohan wrote:
Presently, because of limited system resources, I've set a very conservative
max-scan-size for spamc - I don't want to burden the system with grinding
through those large files. However, this generally means that large messages
come straight through :)
On Friday 03 October 2003 22:36 CET David Parr wrote:
Okay, figured it out. It's the ORBS RBL. It wasn't
responding. Once I removed it, things went very quick
again.
You should really upgrade. ORBS was removed in 2.60 (IIRC already in 2.55).
Cheers,
Malte
--
[SGT] Simon G. Tatham: How to
At 09:53 PM 10/3/03 +0200, Malte Gell wrote:
So I'm looking for a way to use the Message ID, List-ID or
X-Mailing-List header entries to whitelist such messages, how can this
be achieved?
Reall,y custom rules are the only way to do this, however, if the list
server has a reverse DNS entry next to
I'm running postfix, spamd Spamassassin 2.60. I keep getting
messages that should have been filtered by procmail in my mailbox. It
seems that the X-Spam-Status header that I'm using to filter doesn't
match what Spamassassing really thinks.
Have I done something stupid? I'm confused.
Look:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:27:12AM -0500, Jay Pfaffman wrote:
Have I done something stupid? I'm confused.
You're scanning the message twice. The first time rewrites the body as spam,
the second time just rewrites the header as non-spam.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
Psychotics are
On Sat, 4 Oct 2003 11:40:56 -0400, Theo Van Dinter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Sat, Oct 04, 2003 at 10:27:12AM -0500, Jay Pfaffman wrote:
Have I done something stupid? I'm confused.
You're scanning the message twice. The first time rewrites the body as spam,
the second time just rewrites
Hi, I want to upgrade from SA 2.53 to 2.60. It's very likely that some
rules may have been added/deleted. I have modified some scores in my
local.cf
What happens if rules corresponding to the modified scores no longer
exist in SA 2.60 ?
If I am not using Bayes, any gotchas in upgrading from 2.53
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Matthias Fuhrmann wrote:
Hi,
its me again, with the same problem, thnx Malte for answering.
well, i was able to fix the problem, but not at all, as i've seen after
playing with it again.
i still get those strange error messages, as i told u about the other day:
[...]
I am currently running SpamAssassin 2.60 and I did migrate the bayes
database from 2.55 according to the instructions. However, I still have
problems with SA getting timeouts while using the Bayes database, and
someone else had earlier concluded that the Bayes checks get really slow
when there are
Adam Denenberg asks:
Does anybody have any comments or feedback on using SA with perl 5.8
on solaris 9 running 64 bit? Or maybe 2.8 running perl 64 bit?
I've got SA (2.60) running on a Sun Ultra-1, in 64-bit mode on
Solaris 2.8, and don't see any problems. The Perl version I'm using
Hello all.
I just installed spamassassin. I used the sample ~/.procmailrc file.
I see the lines spamassassin adds to each received email header. Si I thought
I'd give it a little test and turn off the spam filters on one of the pop3 servers I
use to get my email.
This server usually gets a
I bet your having fun! Inheriting another person's network can be a
nightmare. I've done so many tweaks, patches, and hacks even I don't know
what I've done :-)
Yes this is possible. As you have heard, not recommended. However you could
send anything greater then 8 to a spamtrap for manual
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003, Sam Kalet wrote:
hI,
you`re right, mixed that lines, sorry :D
[...]
If I change line 707 to read:
last if (defined $actual_length $actual_length == $expected_length);
i've tried this and got still some errors from it. i've changed the line
into:
last if (defined
In a Windows XP environment, I'm trying to run sa-learn on an mbx file with
about 1000 spam messages. Thus far,no success. Following is sequence used:
1. Exported my Spam folder from Outlook 2000 as a pst file. Apparently
successful.
2. Imported the pst file into Outlook Express as a Spam
Hallo SA-List,
since I upgraded of V 2.60 have I no tests (only bayes).
--snip
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60
--snap
Why is autolearn=no ?
--
Viele Grüße, best regards
Jim Knuth
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Zitat
--
Hello German,
Friday, October 3, 2003, 8:11:15 AM, you wrote:
GS Hi list, i have some questions about sa-learn.
GS It is possible to run sa-learn while spamd is running?
GS It is possible to run sa-learn --rebuild while spamd is running?
Yes.
-Abigail
On Thu, Oct 02, 2003 at 10:07:56AM -0500, Tom Meunier wrote:
What to do with a spam that includes this garbage at the bottom, in a hidden font?
Bayes freaked, I'm kinda glad it didn't auto-learn it. I'd rather have the false
negative than that. (Only snipped the Bayes poison from the mail,
1) I see you can turn individual tests off, but, is
there a way to turn off _all_ tests and then turn the
individual tests back on that you prefer (useful for
example, for only using Spam Assassin as a Bayes
filter)? If not, is it at all possible to lobby for
this option to be added :)?
If it's
A friend just sent me this email:
I found a great resource last night for sources of SPAM. www.senderbase.com
I was doing some research last night on where SPAM was coming from on my server.
It is so easy now since I put the Spam assassin engine on the server. I
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone might be able to help me out with my dilemma.
I'm getting an error message in just one of my user's procmail logs. The
error is; 'procmail: Error while writing to caughtspam' I've set the
permissions properly, I'm sure of that.
Here is my setup
K6 2 450 MHz
512
Hello,
I'm using spamassassin version 2.60. I have the following two lines in
my user_prefs file:
rewrite_subject 1
subject_tag *SPAM* _HITS_(_REQD_) al=_AUTOLEARN_
An example spam gets its subject rewritten like so:
Subject: *SPAM* 22.17(05.00) al=_AUTOLEARN_ Life Insurance
I'm
22 matches
Mail list logo
