Re: [SAtalk] LIST ADMIN - SUGGESTION: pool.com

2003-11-16 Thread Dan Wilder
On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:31:42PM -0600, Jacob S. wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 09:30:51 -0800 Dan Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip - talking about the annoying messages coming from pool.com after anyone posts to the list Some mailing list software has the so-called VERP capability, in

[SAtalk] Re: URI database lookup feature

2003-11-16 Thread David B Funk
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, Carl R. Friend wrote: On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, David B Funk wrote: I've been thinking about that exact topic. The Bayes engine already parses and tokenizes hostnames from URIs (the UD: tokens). If there were a hash DB made with the spam-site hostname as key and

Re: [SAtalk] SA problem

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Johnno, Saturday, November 15, 2003, 5:55:35 PM, you wrote: J I have got SA working fine.. What i am wanting to know is how do i J stop SA putting there msg's in the email telling it is spam.. The answer may be different according to what

Re: [SAtalk] updating filters?

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Aaron, Saturday, November 15, 2003, 3:02:54 PM, you wrote: AL I am using an older version of SA (2.50) and have been using it for AL quite some time. Recently more and more spam is starting to get past AL the filters. Is there a way to

Re: [SAtalk] Auto Learn

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Menschel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Johnno, Saturday, November 15, 2003, 6:41:07 PM, you wrote: J I have just noticed in my email headers this J X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=24.8 required=7.5 tests=autolearn=no version=2.60 J I want to use autolearn J I used auto_learn 1 is this

Re: [SAtalk] LIST ADMIN - SUGGESTION: pool.com

2003-11-16 Thread Jacob S.
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003 22:10:33 -0800 Dan Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip VERP is an invention of DJB, the author of qmail. Thus, ezmlm, also written by DJB, is the only mailing list software I'm aware of that supports VERP. Hope he hasn't patented it. Mailman 2.1 implements it.

[SAtalk] BAYES score in subject

2003-11-16 Thread Pedro Sam
Hi all, Does anyone know how to put the BAYES score on the subject line? Right now I have the following in my user_prefs file. rewrite_subject 1 subject_tag [SA _HITS_ BAYES _BAYES_] Thanks, Pedro -- To vacillate or not to vacillate, that is the question ... or is it?

Re: [SAtalk] SA 2.60 - idle spamd childs

2003-11-16 Thread Matthias Fuhrmann
On Sat, 15 Nov 2003, David B Funk wrote: [...] That does not sound right. I'm using sendmail+miltrassassin+spamd and spamd children always quit when done. In other words, when my system is not receiving any mail there is just one sendmail daemon the miltrassassin daemon and the parent spamd

[SAtalk] Possible to not add any headers?

2003-11-16 Thread Robert Nicholson
In addition to SA I use a local baysien based filter and I'm wondering if having X-Spam-Flag: YES as a header in all messages will cause this local filter to not be able to correctly identify false positives set by SA. Is it possible to simply possible to invoke is_spam() and in the process

[SAtalk] Validate Sender Users

2003-11-16 Thread Eduardo Alfonso
Hi I've been trying to configure SpamAssasin to check for the existence of the user on the local machine that is trying to send the message and I couldn't find how to do this. Is it possible ?? Thanx I'm using sendmail MTA in a RedHat9 box Thanx Again --- Size DOES matter -

[SAtalk] RE: Chunks of legit text fooling Bayes

2003-11-16 Thread Mike Loiterman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike Loiterman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm getting an increasing number of messages, probably from the same idiot, with just huge paragraphs of current news or giberish tacked on to the

[SAtalk] Problems moving from 2.5x to 2.6 ?????

2003-11-16 Thread Mairhtin O'Feannag
Hello, I'm currently on version 2.53, and am going to install 2.6 on my machine this weekend. It's a RH 8.0 machine. My question/concern is ... are there any known "gotcha's" in this move? It's a production machine, so I have to be very careful. Any forewarning you might give would