On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 21:41, David B Funk wrote:
> Hate to say it, but it looks like your database is hosed.
Well that's no fun. :-)
> Permissions are OK, it's looking at the correct files, locks are good,
> etc.
Ok...
> those 'File Exists' errors indicate that the DB_File library found
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> /^Reply-to:\s*(<[-a-z0-9_.]+\@([-a-z0-9_]+\.)+[a-z]+>)\s+\1/i
>
> Underscore is not technically valid in a domain name but you do see
> them in practice anyway.
>
> I'm not sure this is any better than what I originally posted, as I
> haven't tested this properly. My
On December 11, 2003 01:09 am, Bob Apthorpe wrote:
> After spending tireless minutes directing people to the SA-Talk
> archives[1], I can't seem to get at them. Does
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk
> work, and if not, is there a better place to peruse the arch
Hi,
> work, and if not, is there a better place to peruse the archives?
Try http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&r=1&w=2
--
Regards,
+-+-+
| Peter Kiem.^. | E-Mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| Zordah IT
Hello Justin,
Wednesday, December 10, 2003, 12:51:28 PM, you wrote:
J> On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Christopher Kunz wrote:
>> What is the typical half-life of a spam domain? As far as I can recall
>> from my brief glimpses at the stuff in my spam folders, I have never
>> seen that a domain was spamver
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 15:28:27 -0600, SpamTalk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
posted to spamassassin-talk:
>> Note that numbers are sometimes substituted for letters.
>> [SNIP] This argues for phoneming and/or spell-checking before ALPHA-ing.
> I figured just stripping them would be best, or with maybe an ad
Hi,
After spending tireless minutes directing people to the SA-Talk
archives[1], I can't seem to get at them. Does
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum=spamassassin-talk
work, and if not, is there a better place to peruse the archives?
Just covering all my bases here...
-- Bob
[1]
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:58:12 -0700, Daniel Kaliel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> ya it exsists. After no luck in the searches, I did try to join a procmail
> user group, however after there server is rejecting all my attempts to join.
> So I thought to try here, in the hopes
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, AthlonRob wrote:
> On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 19:50, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> > in the same directory as the bayes DB files.
>
> Unfortunately, there are no .lock files in that directory.
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.spamassassin$ sa-learn --rebuild -DD
> debug: Final PATH set to: /usr
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 11:38:59 -0500, Stephen M. Przepiora
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted to spamassassin-talk:
> Almost all spam comes through with a url to click on, or a url to load
> an image from. Most spammers have multiple domains they use, and
> rotate through them. We match these domains and
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:08 PM 12/10/2003, Justin wrote:
> >So that's how check_rbl and check_rbl_sub work? I always wondered about
> >that. So what happens if an IP exists in two subzones at the same time?
>
> With SORBS, it's done by returning multiple results for a sin
At 07:17 PM 12/10/03 -0800, AthlonRob wrote:
Cannot open bayes databases /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed:
...
Where might the lock files be?
Try /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes*.lock
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IB
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 19:50, Adam Denenberg wrote:
> in the same directory as the bayes DB files.
Unfortunately, there are no .lock files in that directory.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.spamassassin$ sa-learn --rebuild -DD
debug: Score set 0 chosen.
debug: running in taint mode? yes
debug: Running in tai
in the same directory as the bayes DB files.
adam
- Original Message -
From: "AthlonRob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] sa-learn ... R/W: tie failed!
> On Wed, 2003-12-
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 19:11, Justin Mason wrote:
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/.spamassassin$ sa-learn --rebuild
> > Cannot open bayes databases /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/O: tie failed:
> > Cannot open bayes databases /var/amavis/.spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: tie failed:
> > File exists
> > Cann
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
AthlonRob writes:
> Hello list-
>
> I've been using SA for a while, including the bayes stuff, training it
> with sa-learn every few weeks on the latest spam samples and ham I
> happen to have received.
>
> I just did... a root oops.
>
> I was runn
Hello list-
I've been using SA for a while, including the bayes stuff, training it
with sa-learn every few weeks on the latest spam samples and ham I
happen to have received.
I just did... a root oops.
I was running known spam mails through a script which does a
sa-learn --single --spam on the t
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 05:40:49PM -0800, Fred Bennett wrote:
> version.c:30:16: db.h: No such file or directory
>
> Now I'm at a loss. It's probably staring me right in the face, but being
> a Linux/Spamassassin/CPAN noob and a tired, fried one at that, I don't
> see what should be tried next. So
It's pretty straight forward, just make sure that the config options point
to the correct directory and file locations for your setup. If you have
specific questions after you have done this, let me know.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Smart,Dan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTEC
Hello. My first post here, so be gentle ;-)
I got Spamassassin 2.61 installed and it's working. Bayes is enabled,
but when I try to train it or do anything with sa-learn I get something
like
this:
Use of uninitialized value in numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.1/Mail/SpamAssassin/Baye
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
> Soundex might be a practical solution. Perhaps a manageable approach
> is to first apply a spelling check using both a regular dictionary
> and augmenting it with a set of spammer mis-spellings. Then, send the
> output of that step into Soundex. The Soundex
> There are a number of providers that are utterly unresponsive until
> someone (metaphorically) smacks them upside the head with a paving brick.
That works for me.
Where do we sign up?
-JR
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutor
Soundex might be a practical solution. Perhaps a manageable approach
is to first apply a spelling check using both a regular dictionary
and augmenting it with a set of spammer mis-spellings. Then, send the
output of that step into Soundex. The Soundex is a heuristic for catching
the creative alter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
>At 06:48 PM 12/10/2003, stan wrote:
>>Did I do wrong by teaching it with lots of _good_ messages? Should I reset
>>it to the base rules, and start over? BTW how can I do that?
>
>Idealisticaly you want to train it with something
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Gary Funck wrote:
> > It might be convenient to view each these transformations as
> > operating on the output of the previous. I think you were.
> > By doing so, it avoids replicating the description of the
> > previous phase.
>
> I meant to add the following sugested additio
At 06:48 PM 12/10/2003, stan wrote:
Did I do wrong by teaching it with lots of _good_ messages? Should I reset
it to the base rules, and start over? BTW how can I do that?
Idealisticaly you want to train it with something "realistic" in terms of
spam/ham ratio.. ie: something close to what you get
I installed Spamassain a couple of days ago, on a Debina machine, and at
frst it seemed to work great, catching all but a few spam messages. Then I
used sa-learn to teach it using hundreds of stored mails I have in my mail
folders (mostly from mailing lists). Now it seesm to be missing nearly
every
Hi,
> While gargling concrete, "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed:
>
> > However, anything in language [X] is always spam, so let me ban [X]
> > without having to unban every other possible language.
>
> Pretty Draconian. Must be nice to be able to do that.
Not 'nice' but 'convenient'; I d
Please note that the following rules that I sent earlier today...
rawbody GWW_PUNCT /([a-z][:punct:][a-z])|( [A-Z][:punct:]+|[a-z])/i
score GWW_PUNCT 2.0
...was effectively untested. And I discovered a flaw fairly quickly. It
also matches words like "can't" and "it's".
It also has a case-insen
While gargling concrete, "Dan Jacobson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spewed:
> However, anything in language [X] is always spam, so let me ban [X]
> without having to unban every other possible language.
>
>
Pretty Draconian. Must be nice to be able to do that.
My clients/customers tend to whine a little
>> And what if it doesn't match any of our ok_languages? then it will
>> fail, against our wishes. Can you guarantee that you know all the
>> possibilities?
D> I still don't understand. You don't speak 1000 languages. Most speak 3
D> or 4 at most They can add these to ok_languanges.
OK, you
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 02:08:33PM -0800, Gary Funck wrote:
> Are you saying it should've looked like this?
>
> if ((!defined($oldmagic) || $oldmagic eq "") || $atime < $oldmagic) {
> $self->{db_toks}->{$OLDEST_TOKEN_AGE_MAGIC_TOKEN} = $atime;
> }
yeah, although my patch will be a l
Hi Theo.
> -Original Message-
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 2:02 PM
> To: Gary Funck
> Cc: Spamassassin List
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] non-numeric atime in Bayes db? (SA 2.61)
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:44:17PM -0800, Gary Fun
Good afternoon, Stephen,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Stephen Westrip wrote:
> I am trying to set up sa-learn in a site-wide configuration. I have a Red
> Hat 9 server, SpamAssassin 2.61 and MIMEDefanf 2.39. I have got SA to work
> fine and our spam has dropped considerably, but I would also like to use
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:44:17PM -0800, Gary Funck wrote:
> Follow-up, adding a check to see if $oldmagic is "" made the complaints
> go away:
>
>1248 my $oldmagic =
> $self->{db_toks}->{$OLDEST_TOKEN_AGE_MAGIC_TOKEN};
>1249 $oldmagic = 0 if (defined($oldmagic) && $oldmagic eq ""
Yes, the DB_File Perl module has been installed.
If I run a sa-learn --dump I get this output;
0.000 0 2 0 non-token data: bayes db version
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nspam
0.000 0 0 0 non-token data: nham
0.000
>This paragraph suggests that the spelling transformation would
>proceed the ALPHED transformation.
Probably would have to be a fork rather than pipe, once it was phonemed, I
would think it would be hard to get back into recognizable English. Then
again that's what IBM ViaVoice and Dragon Dictate
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary
> Funck
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 8:49 AM
> To: Spamassassin List
> Subject: [SAtalk] non-numeric atime in Bayes db? (SA 2.61)
>
>
>
> Hello,
>
> after running a spam refiling script which
Brad Wilkin said:
> I seem to have a rash of spam lately that gets by SA because the subject
> line
> and/or body of the message contains spam phrases but words have been
> obfuscated by
> inserting semicolons, periods and other punctuation or special characters.
> In
> somes cases, the punctuatio
Gary Funck said:
> Question to the group: what's the procedure for running the rules against
> the
> spam/ham samples to come up wiht hit frequencies?
mass-check in the masses directory of the SpamAssassin source archive
(methinks)
--
Chris Thielen
Easily generate SpamAssassin rules to catch ob
>It might be convenient to view each these transformations as
operating on the output of the previous.
Indeed, I was. Elegance + Efficiency + Functionality = GoodCode(TM)
>Note that numbers are sometimes substituted for letters.
>[SNIP] This argues for phoneming and/or spell-checking before ALP
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary
> Funck
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 1:09 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] [RD] raw/rare/folded/plain/alphed body/subject
> rendering streams
>
>
>
>
> > -Original M
>>FOLDED set all lowercase
>> Remove HTML
>> punctuation to be underscore,
>Why on earth do you want to "set all lowercase"?
I guess folding the case might be overkill in the "simplification" process.
As a matter of curiosity, does the objection extend to doing
> -Original Message-
> From: SpamTalk
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 12:49 PM
>
> It would seem to me that, for purposes of rule simplification, that the
> subject and body of messages to be scanned should be available in
> pre-processed flavors, some of which is currently availabl
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Christopher Kunz wrote:
> What is the typical half-life of a spam domain? As far as I can recall
> from my brief glimpses at the stuff in my spam folders, I have never
> seen that a domain was spamvertised in two different spam runs.
I have a 15,000 entry list of spamming d
At 03:48 PM 12/10/2003, SpamTalk wrote:
FOLDED set all lowercase
Remove HTML
punctuation to be underscore,
Why on earth do you want to "set all lowercase"? Every regex in the ruleset
can be set to case sensitve or insensitve on it's own, so this adjustment
only m
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 02:08 PM 12/10/2003, Justin wrote:
> >So that's how check_rbl and check_rbl_sub work? I always wondered about
> >that. So what happens if an IP exists in two subzones at the same time?
>
> With SORBS, it's done by returning multiple results for a si
Good afternoon, Kris,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Kris Deugau wrote:
> William Stearns wrote:
> > You should use _bounce_ or _redirect_, instead.
>
> Which, unfortunately, adds some new headers with most MUAs. :( Along
> with the extra set of Received: headers that go along with sending a
> message
It would seem to me that, for purposes of rule simplification, that the
subject and body of messages to be scanned should be available in
pre-processed flavors, some of which is currently available. Assume the spam
key is some thing like that Vuhee drug, V=P i=o e=a n=g s=r u=a (i.e.
Poensu)
RAW
William Stearns wrote:
> You should use _bounce_ or _redirect_, instead.
Which, unfortunately, adds some new headers with most MUAs. :( Along
with the extra set of Received: headers that go along with sending a
message (which you could probably work around).
The only way I've seen to get a mes
>-Original Message-
>From: Lentz, Wayne
>
>So I tried that and it helped as the script now runs, but it does't pull
any
>messages off Exchange. It reports that it pulled 1 message, and does
create
>an empty file named "1" in /var/amavisd/spam. It produces these results
>regardless of how
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Webster
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:45 AM
>
>
> Here's what I've recently done:
> rawbody GWW_PUNCT /([a-z][:punct:]+[a-z])|( [A-Z][:punct:]+[a-z])/i
> score GWW_PUNCT 2.0
>
> It's not perfect, but it does the job.
I think that pattern is g
At 02:08 PM 12/10/2003, Justin wrote:
So that's how check_rbl and check_rbl_sub work? I always wondered about
that. So what happens if an IP exists in two subzones at the same time?
With SORBS, it's done by returning multiple results for a single query.
host 138.81.106.218.dnsbl.sorbs.net
138.81
Greg Webster wrote:
Here's what I've recently done:
rawbody GWW_PUNCT /([a-z][:punct:]+[a-z])|( [A-Z][:punct:]+[a-z])/i
score GWW_PUNCT 2.0
It's not perfect, but it does the job.
As well, I've noticed a lot of these include the domain 'doctor45.com',
so I've been giving a good high score for th
Here's what I've recently done:
rawbody GWW_PUNCT /([a-z][:punct:]+[a-z])|( [A-Z][:punct:]+[a-z])/i
score GWW_PUNCT 2.0
It's not perfect, but it does the job.
As well, I've noticed a lot of these include the domain 'doctor45.com',
so I've been giving a good high score for that one.
Greg
--
Fred wrote:
That's a fake header name with your e-mail address encoded with base64.
I guessed it is some spam devilry. Actually, I don't care if harvesters
pick up this address, it's also under SA monitoring :-)
Add the following rule to your local.cf and you will never see those again
;)
Isn't h
Christopher Kunz wrote:
> BTW: What kind of header is this?
>
> X-Ki:
>
> --ck
That's a fake header name with your e-mail address encoded with base64.
Un-base64 that and you get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I munged most of it for your protection, but having that encoding here is
enough to give your addr
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 01:39 PM 12/10/2003, Justin wrote:
> > Still, is there a way to
> >conditionally check/skip a DNSBL rule?
>
> No.
>
> However, if there's an agregate database, you can query multiple lists at
> the same time.. Currently the SORBS and OPM rules work
At 01:39 PM 12/10/2003, Justin wrote:
Still, is there a way to
conditionally check/skip a DNSBL rule?
No.
However, if there's an agregate database, you can query multiple lists at
the same time.. Currently the SORBS and OPM rules work this way.. only one
DNS query is made for all the lists in t
All,
It was suggested off list that I remove the '<>' brackets from this section:
my $server = Mail::IMAPClient->new(
Server => "",
User => "",
Password => "",
Uid => 1,
Debug => 0 );
So I tried that and it helped as the script now runs, but it does't pull
ya it exsists. After no luck in the searches, I did try to join a procmail
user group, however after there server is rejecting all my attempts to join.
So I thought to try here, in the hopes of finding a procmail guru! :)
- Original Message -
From: "Evan Platt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "S
Gary Funck wrote:
A pattern like the following:
/([a-z][;][a-z]+.*){5}/i
might get some traction. This has to be run after the HTML is stripped.
That exact message got through here, too. Actually, it was using the
whitelist_from trick to get a whopping -93.6 points, but OTOH, bayes_60
and l
> I am pulling my example off the following url.
>
> http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
>
> I have setup the following rule in my user_prefs file.
>
> uri EVILLIST_2 /\b(?:dubnh\.us)\b/i
> describe EVILLIST_2 Generated EvilList_2
> score EVILLIST_2 3.0
Uri is a priveleged
On Wednesday 10 December 2003 12:10 pm, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 11:32 AM 12/10/2003, Larry Starr wrote:
> >My question regards scripts to ease processing of these mailboxes. Since
> > the messages are forwarded, from several different Email clients
> > (netscape, kmail, pine, AppleMail, etc), ext
Good afternoon, Larry,
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Larry Starr wrote:
> I currently have mimedefang (2.37) and spamassassin (2.60) running on a RH9
> mail gateway.
>
> Spamassassin is configured to block messages with a very high SA score and to
> tag and pass along everything else.
>
> I have two a
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 11:44 AM -0700 Daniel Kaliel
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I read through the readme and made a config change to the way procmail
> and spamassassin work together, however I now get the error:
>
> couldn't create or rename temp file. "/var/spool/mail/il -
Does anyone have a DNSBL rule for SPEWS that conditionally checks both
level 1 and level 2? Remember that l2 also contains l1. What I'm looking
for is a way to haev SA first query l1.spews.sorbs.net. If a record
exists in l1 then a score should be assigned (2 for example) and the l2
check should
I read through the readme and made a config
change to the way procmail and spamassassin work together, however I now get the
error:
couldn't create or rename temp file.
"/var/spool/mail/il -oi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have a default /etc/procmailrc with the
lines
:0fw: spamassassin.lock
*
On 07 Dec 2003, at 01:02, David B Funk wrote:
You've got spamd running as the user "postfix" (that "-u postfix"
command line argument). Thus the user postfix needs to have write
permissions to the bayes_* files. but in that directory listing
you show:
4160 -rw--- 1 user staff 5111808 Dec 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
>At 10:09 AM 12/10/03 -0500, Stephen M. Przepiora wrote:
>
>>Hello, I have constructed a huge list of rules and wish to detect how good
>>they are. Is there a way to log the count of rule matches somewhere?
>
>if you've got a spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stephen M. Przepiora writes:
> Hello, I have constructed a huge list of rules and wish to detect how
> good they are. Is there a way to log the count of rule matches somewhere?
Hi --
about time I documented this properly; should be helpful for the
To comment on Bob's approach that's exactly what got me going in the Linux world...
Exchagne2K.
Here is my experience with Exchange 2K. This is a little off topic I just wanted to
include some feedback.
Here was the problem that we had (and the solution) when I started running Exchange
2K.
Do you have an example of how to configure the dcc_conf? The INSTALL.txt
and dccifd.html offers very little on this.
<>
| -Original Message-
| From: Bill Landry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:50 AM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Us
At 12:04 PM 12/10/2003, Stephen Westrip wrote:
What exactly do I need to do to make this work? I have read lots about
adding 'bayes_auto_learn 1' and other bits and pieces to put in the cf file
but whatever I try the Bayes DB never gets added to.
did you install DB_File? if not, bayes won't go.
At 11:32 AM 12/10/2003, Larry Starr wrote:
My question regards scripts to ease processing of these mailboxes. Since the
messages are forwarded, from several different Email clients (netscape,
kmail, pine, AppleMail, etc), extracting the original message, for sa-learn
is proving to be non-trivial.
> -Original Message-
> From: Brad Wilkin
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 9:23 AM
[...]
> Has anyone had success writing tests that can catch this sort of
> trickery? It
> seems if you could come up with a level of punctuation WITHIN
> words or simply
> remove common punctuation from
Hi, I was trying to find any information on batching messages with
spamc and could not find anything so I am asking the list:
Is it possible to batch multiple files with spamc? In other words
instead of redirecting messages one at a time to spamc (spamc [options]
< message) give spa
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I am pulling my example off the following url.
http://www.merchantsoverseas.com/wwwroot/gorilla/bigevil.cf
I have setup the following rule in my user_prefs file.
uri EVILLIST_2 /\b(?:dubnh\.us)\b/i
describe EVILLIST_2 Generated EvilList_2
score EVI
I seem to have a rash of spam lately that gets by SA because the subject line
and/or body of the message contains spam phrases but words have been obfuscated by
inserting semicolons, periods and other punctuation or special characters. In
somes cases, the punctuation displaces a character (s*xual)
Hi,
[N.B. Reformatted into a sensible whole. Please trim your posts, line
wrap and (I know this sounds petty) please don't top post if you expect
follow-ups. Thanks.]
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 09:22:06 -0600 "JRiley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Efren Pedroza
> > On Behalf Of gentian
> > > I a
Dear All,
I am trying to set up sa-learn in a site-wide configuration. I have a Red
Hat 9 server, SpamAssassin 2.61 and MIMEDefanf 2.39. I have got SA to work
fine and our spam has dropped considerably, but I would also like to use
sa-learn.
What exactly do I need to do to make this work? I have
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Lentz, Wayne
> Sent: Wednesday, December 10, 2003 7:38 AM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [SAtalk] Help with Mark Motley's perl script
>
> Guys,
>
> I'm trying to use the perl script that M
>
> should I try an 'sa-learn --rebuild' at this point?
>
>
follow-up. 'sa-learn --rebuild' just printed out more of these messages:
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 362.
> Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at
> /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/Spam
Are you running spamd as yourself, or as another user (nobody, or root, or
whatever)? It sounds quite likely that the user your running spamd as doesn't
have a ~/.razor/ set up, but your own user does.
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Mark Norton wrote:
> Any reason why I would get razor results against spam
--On Wednesday, December 10, 2003 10:54 AM -0500 Josh Endries
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I get a lot of postmaster emails, and I'm trying to whitelist them so
> they aren't marked as spam. Even though many are bounces due to spam, I
> would like to whitelist them so I don't miss any legit emails
It should already be installed at /var/dcc/libexec/dccifd (depending on your
./configure parameters). All you have to do is setup the config files at
/var/dcc/dcc_conf and /var/dcc/libexec/start-dccifd, then execute
start-dccifd and you should be good to go.
Oh, and appears to run faster in our e
Hello,
after running a spam refiling script which invokes 'spamassassin -r', I
received the
following diagnostics:
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Conf.pm line 362.
Argument "" isn't numeric in numeric lt (<) at
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/BayesStore.pm line
First, thanks for the reply.
This method wouldn't work for us as I can not keep a copy of all mail
through the server for legal reasons. What I need is a way for spamd to
log the hit count for each rule as it processes the mail. This way I can
prune old rules from the system (we currently run c
I currently have mimedefang (2.37) and spamassassin (2.60) running on a RH9
mail gateway.
Spamassassin is configured to block messages with a very high SA score and to
tag and pass along everything else.
I have two accounts set up, on an internal server, for users to forward
received spam, and
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 01:22:23AM -0500, Bryan Hoover wrote:
> stan wrote:
> > Yes, I just erviewd the firewall config. It will pass all trafic
> > originating on the innsied. I see that may not be a good general case, but
> > it should be OK here (Small home network).
> >
> > BTW, I decided to t
At 10:09 AM 12/10/03 -0500, Stephen M. Przepiora wrote:
Hello, I have constructed a huge list of rules and wish to detect how good
they are. Is there a way to log the count of rule matches somewhere?
if you've got a spam/ham corpus, you can test your rules using the tools in
the masses/ subdirec
Hey guys and gals,
I get a lot of postmaster emails, and I'm trying to whitelist them so
they aren't marked as spam. Even though many are bounces due to spam, I
would like to whitelist them so I don't miss any legit emails. I turned
bayes off because it learned these as spam. Anyway I haven't f
The DCC documentation says that the dccifd interface is much more efficient
than dccproc. I see from doing a spamassassin -D that it looks for it.
Is there any install procedure for dccifd, and should this be the generally
recommended interface for dcc?
Why or why not?
TIA
<>
--
Barb Bautista wrote:
Newbie question...sorry for my ignorance.
What do I do with the "tests performed" available here:
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
Could someone please explain if I should just copy this file into a .cf file
in my local.cf? I am currently running SA site-wide.
That's ju
At 09:48 AM 12/10/03 +0100, stephane ancelot wrote:
Hi,
are there any rules to avoid sven messages ?
bye
steph
It's not really the point of SA, however Andreas Kotowicz posted a list of
rules that appear to work well.
My only criticism of this ruleset is that he forgot to name all the
sub-rules
Guys,
I'm trying to use the perl script that Mark posted, for feeding bayes with
mail in our Exchange5.5 public folders. But when I execute the script it,
it gives me the error below. I know squat about perl and google isn't
giving me much, so I'm hoping you guys can help me help me with this.
T
At 09:34 AM 12/10/03 -0500, Barb Bautista wrote:
What do I do with the "tests performed" available here:
http://www.spamassassin.org/tests.html
Could someone please explain if I should just copy this file into a .cf file
in my local.cf? I am currently running SA site-wide.
Um, don't do *anything*
At 11:45 PM 12/9/03 -0800, Justin Mason wrote:
Oh yeah, forgot to mention I finally got around to migrating all the FAQ
stuff onto the Wiki ;)
Heh, yeah, I caused me to go "Where the heck is that FAQ link???!!!" for
about 5 seconds before I saw the wiki one..
Ok, my real impressions were a little
At 09:58 AM 12/10/03 +0200, Ryan Lumsden wrote:
how do I get spamd to log to a diffrent file besides messages and mail.log.
edit your /etc/syslog.conf and use spamd's -s parameter to change what
syslog facility to use.
Spamd isn't writing to any files at all, it's just doing standard
unix-style
SA does have the ability to filter (block/discard)
if so configured.. basically by just setting SA to delete any incoming
scanned msg with a score of 5+ (default score level).
As far as setting up a whitelist, on a win32
implementation of SA, read the SA docs, and/or visit some sites with
1 - 100 of 125 matches
Mail list logo
