[THIS LIST HAS MOVED! see http://useast.spamassassin.org/lists.html .]On Sat, Jan 24,
2004 at 10:49:37AM +0400, Dr Aldo Medina
carved this out of pure phosphors:
Is there any way to protecto form this?. I just received this email:
TThe coomputeer mmust haave the 'suspend too RRAAM'
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:50:58PM +0100, pacho baratta
carved this out of pure phosphors:
Uhm, see you around, i guess?
--
panic(Detected a card I can't drive - whoops\n);
2.2.16 /usr/src/linux/drivers/net/daynaport.c
---
The
On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 08:03:59AM +0100, John Wilcock
carved this out of pure phosphors:
On Sun, 4 Jan 2004 13:35:30 -0700, Anthony Martinez wrote:
In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the
X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this
X-Mailer
In the spam that has deliberate bayes-busters (three lines of random words), the
X-Mailer header is totally bogus, like this
X-Mailer: cyan exiting space
header XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer =~ /^[^A-Z0-9]*$/
describe XMAILERBOGUS X-Mailer header has NO uppercase letters, NO
On Thu, Dec 25, 2003 at 11:00:14PM -0800, schafer
carved this out of pure phosphors:
To Spamassassin:
My publication is double-opted in by 15,000 families with children with
autism. We are routinely victimized by incompetent software like
spamassassin because of false positives. This is
On Sat, Dec 27, 2003 at 10:50:18AM -0500, Fred
carved this out of pure phosphors:
Something about this causes it to hit on every message which does not
contain a X-Originating-IP header. I think you need a meta test to check if
that tag exists before checking if it *doesn't* contain that
I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number. Hotmail
always puts the dotted quad in the header.
I wrote a rule to match this - I hope it's useful.
header XORIG_IP_NOT_NUMBER X-Originating-IP !~ /\[[\d\.]*]/
describe XORIG_IP_NOT_NUMBERThe X-Originating-IP
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:13:46PM -0800, George
carved this out of pure phosphors:
Hello list!
Can someone show me a rule for detecting an empty subject line?
I've searched and tried just about everythign under the sun.
header EMPTYSUBJECT Subject =~ ^$
describe EMPTYSUBJECT Empty
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 02:19:21PM -0700, Anthony Martinez
carved this out of pure phosphors:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2003 at 01:13:46PM -0800, George
carved this out of pure phosphors:
Hello list!
Can someone show me a rule for detecting an empty subject line?
I've searched and tried just
On Mon, Dec 22, 2003 at 11:00:52AM -0500, Christopher X. Candreva
carved this out of pure phosphors:
And, anyone know what the x-stuff-for-pete I often see in spam is from ?
Eudora adds that to HTML mail for reasons known only to Pete.
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 09:51:46AM -0700, Rum Jungle
carved this out of pure phosphors:
Hi,
How can I get spamd running on red hat 9 using
xinetd.d?
That would totally defeat the POINT of a daemon. Spamd runs by itself and
listens on port 783 for a spamc connection.
Pi
Also I am having
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 10:24:21AM -0700, Catherine Pinatiello
carved this out of pure phosphors:
I installed spamassassin on a cobalt Raq3. (Yeah I can hear the groans
already.) So on starting spamd using the script in rc.d it gives this
message:
Starting spamd: spamdCould not create
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:39:18PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter
carved this out of pure phosphors:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 12:26:59PM -0600, Anthony Martinez wrote:
I think, last time I saw this discussed, you needed to add
spamd 783/tcp
No you don't.
in /etc/services
13 matches
Mail list logo
