installed SA by looking through my "receipts"
folder (Amazon, Buy.Com, eBay, etc) and my (genuine) mailing list
acknowledgements for elements unique to me.
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
---
This sf.n
. This is clearly a legitimite mail.
The caps thing might be a character class problem. When I first installed
it, SA didn't claim to require perl 5.6+, but it used regexps that did,
like /[:lower:]/. Those are legitimate in perl 5.0, too, but they mean
something quite different.
--
Ben
*know* you're on my list. Or my friend Michael's list,
or my friend Bob's list...
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
---
This sf.net email is sponsored
to force
them to serialize:
:0fw:$PMDIR/spamassassin.lock
| spamassassin -P -F 0
I use it as a filter, hence the f flag, but you can use a lockfile
with a delivery rule as well. If you have multiple points where you
can run spamassassin from your procmailrc, just use the same lockfile
on each.
?idchr(hex(20))11602
It must be the one in `get_decoded_stripped_body_text_array' since
it's the only one I see missing the `e' flag to make the sub work.
However, the message is not quoted printable (I was testing on your
reply, which has the same problem and no mime at all).
-
/^https?\:\/\/\S+\?id=/is
Since this is a fine perl pattern (which works with perl -e) I'm assuming
there's something wrong with the buffer I'm comparing to. I can match
the '2011602' fine, so it's not truncated. What's going
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 11:12:18AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
> Ben Jackson wrote:
> BJ> There is a bug with -e (or whatever the 'exit code' flag is) where it
> BJ> exits nonzero for negative scores too. Different problem, though.
>
> It's doing what now?
re it
exits nonzero for negative scores too. Different problem, though.
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get the r
er second thoughput using spamd.
Sounds like spamd/spamc is a little faster, but less still less
configurable...
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for downloa
o-inc.com which spams me regularly. I don't count
them as "opt in" or "requires subscription" when all that means is that
someone ELSE can type my email address into a form and I start getting
junkmail. Mypoints seems to have given up after I bounced all their
mail for a
it too literally for our needs. The intelligibility
of the results is poor, which makes it hard to determine if they are
right or wrong.
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROT
strip the
junk back out for non-spam. I also use all the tersest reporting
options.
When I'm working on new rules I use a mutt macro which pipes the
messages through "spamassassin -t" to see how it's being scored. Since
I want to see the changes as I edit the scores and
e maildir program explicitly, like:
:0
* ^X-Spam-Flag:
| maildir $MAILDIR/.spam
procmail's maildir-like delivery is Not Quite Right. maildir is part of
the safecat package.
(note I use .spam because that's what courier expects, I'm not sure
about direct-maildir-access programs)
o my Junk folder, hence the else clause:
:0fw
| spamassassin -P -F 0
:0
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
| /usr/local/bin/maildir $MAILDIR/.Junk
# else filter the spamassassin info back out
:0 E f w
| spamassassin -d
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROT
e mail as spam, and 2) if, as you
say, it matches mostly non-spam for you, it's not a bad test to let the
GA assign a value to.
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
Arrgh, I failed to hit send on this last night. I've had to modify a
few of the stock rules. Here they are:
# Less restrictive
body DEAR_SOMEBODY /^Dear /
# add fax, allow more space before the phone number
body CALL_FREE
/(?:call|dial|fax).{1,40}8(?:00|88|77|66|
I almost forgot. I've had to tweak a few existing rules.
# Slightly less picky than the stock rule
body DEAR_SOMEBODY /^Dear /
# Needed more space between the call/dial and the number, and added fax
body CALL_FREE
/(?:call|dial|fax).{1,40}8(?:00|88|77|66|55|44|33|
UX_PRESS_RELEASE 1
# I bet there are more redirectors in .to, but I haven't found them all
# Similar to the free webhosting rule above.
rawbody BITE_ME_TONGA /http:\/\/(?:come|go|explode)\.to\//i
describe BITE_ME_TONGA Bite me, Kingdom of Tonga
score BITE_ME_TONGA 1.5
body NIGERIA /\bNigerian
common, and does not often appear in
# unsolicited mail.
body MY_NAME /benedict/i
describe MY_NAME Contains Benedict (bjj)
score MY_NAME -2
# Again, my real name on the To line, very rare in spam
header TO_MY_NAME To =~ /Ben Jackson/
describe TO_MY_NAME To knows my full name (bjj)
score TO_MY_NAME
;ll follow this up with some threads about new rules so the discussion
is easier to follow.
--
Ben Jackson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://www.ben.com/
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
20 matches
Mail list logo