I think this is a side effect of the way Postini (and some
others) do mail filtering for enterprises -- basically they sell
a mail forwarding service, which you create as your low-score MX
record, they scrub mail, then forward to your real mail
server. The sales pitch says If our service
Smarter spammers who are trying to avoid Postini etc. will also
be smarter at avoiding our filters.
C
On Thursday, July 18, 2002, at 09:56 AM, Martin Nile wrote:
However it seems that a higher percentage of SPAM that slips in beneath
spamassassin came in via the secondary MX.
Hmm, does this count as spam?
Deersoft announced today the release of their first
SpamAssassin-derived product for windows:
http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/020718/180175_1.html
Basically, an outlook plugin with an SA backend. Now Windows
users can share the benefits of SA.
For those of you who are
TOTALSPAMNONSPAM
32142280 934 SMTPD_IN_RCVD
So there's about twice as much spam as nonspam sent through that
mail server. The way scores are set is related to the relative
frequency of spam vs nonspam triggering a particular rule, but
the
Jim,
please forward the spam to [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- they'll hopefully
be able to deal with it.
Thanks,
C
On Saturday, July 13, 2002, at 06:46 AM, Jim Meyering wrote:
FYI,
I was dismayed to find obvious spam in my inbox today.
This came through with such a high score because amazon.com
Whitelist entries can either be on separate lines, as Mike
describes, or you can put multiple address patterns on one line,
separated by whitespace. No quotes nor commas.
C
On Sunday, July 14, 2002, at 01:30 AM, Mike Burger wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jul 2002, Chris Ogles wrote:
Can someone help
That's probably illegal in a lot of jurisdictions.
C
On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 04:13 PM, Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2002 at 01:34:19PM -0600, Mike Diehl wrote:
The other day, I got this little jewel in my e-mail. So I
decided to have a
little fun. I sent a reply to the
I've long been of the philosophy that spamassassin should focus
on exactly one thing: identification and tagging of spam. Leave
the delivery to something which does delivery well. Leave the
SMTP to something which does SMTP well. etc, etc, etc. I
haven't chopped out the delivery stuff
Ok, enough bugfixes and scorefixes to 2.30 are in, and it looks to be in good
enough shape that I've packaged it up and released it. This is really a service
release to get something a little better than 2.30 out, since I'm heading off
tonight for my 2 week carribean honeymoon. First week, no
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/06/19/1335210mode=threadtid=111
MC http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyu=/cn/20020619/tc_cn/937300printer=1
MC
MC CmdrTaco says that SA catches over a hundred spam a day for him; pretty good
MC publicity. The Razor for Outlook
It also depends on the people. Some people definitely prefer
easy-to-intall-and-configure worriless time-limited shareware to
have-to-be-a-unix-sysadmin free (as in beer) software. Which is why we think
DeerSoft can thrive by putting a lot of work into the free (beer and speech)
SpamAssassin
Ok folks,
This is probably the last time I'll check list mail before I head out tonight.
Have fun while I'm gone, keep up the good work, don't let the bedbugs bite, etc.
See you all in 2 weeks.
C
---
Sponsored by:
ThinkGeek at
Plus Vipul seems to be pretty smart, so I'm betting that Razor will only get
better and better with time.
C
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
TVD On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 09:32:12AM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote:
TVD Not sure why so much effort is given to Razor.
TVD
TVD I'm using neither Razor nor DCC
Actually, you would gain a tiny bit -- if a spamc call happens at the moment
when spamd is dead and not yet re-listening on the port, then you'll have a
message or two not filtered (depending on load and timing). If spamd re-reads
its config file without stopping listening on the port, then
I've checked in to the HEAD cvs branch a manual application of Theo's patch, so
if you get the latest CVS along with the new Razor2, try it out and let me know
if it's not working.
C
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
TVD On Mon, Jun 17, 2002 at 11:39:07AM -0700, Craig R Hughes wrote:
TVD Still working
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know a way of whitelisting mail from certain email servers? We
are trying to do this because originally we whitelisted our domain name, now
we are getting spams through with a forged source address from our domain
name. So we were thinking we could
The original link is toast, but it looks to be archived at
http://www.eatmycomix.com/02.02.13.html
C
Bob Proulx wrote:
BP I started using SA, and now I worry why inbox is so empty. I guess I really
BP only get spam. :)
BP
BP A few months ago a list reader posted a pointer to a cartoon
I'm not so sure outlook won't display all kinds of weird stuff if it says it has
a particular MIME type (and is maybe even encoded), if:
a) there are no other parts
b) the thing actually decodes to text, even if the MIME type is wrong
c) the thing actually decodes to X (where X is MSWord, RTF,
It was probably me when I broght all the 2_3_0 line changes forward onto the
trunk.
C
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ Bart Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DQ
DQ Hmm, I just did a cvs up (on the head, not the branch) and:
DQ
DQ score: FORGED_RCVD_TRAIL 1.000 - absent
DQ score: MSGID_CHARS_WEIRD
Great work Theo. Thanks! We'll probably want to make a 2.31 release with some
updated scores and Razor 2 support asap.
C
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
TVD On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 04:39:25PM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
TVD I've sent in a patch to add support, but there were some bugs in the
TVD
Miles Fidelman wrote:
MF On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
MF
MF Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
Not yet -- there are some errors which crop up when invoking Razor from spamd --
we're working with the Razor guys to resolve the problem. We have a patch ready
Did you restart spamd?
C
Christophe Zwecker wrote:
CZ Hi,
CZ
CZ I upgraded from 2.20 to 2.30, but below header shows version 2.20, is
CZ that normal or did something go wrong in my upgrade ?
CZ
CZ X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=8.0 tests=FROM_AND_TO_SAME,AWL
CZ version=2.20
CZ
CZ
CZ
Rule added.
C
Skip Montanaro wrote:
SM rawbody OBFUSCATING_JAVASCRIPT /charCodeAt|fromCharCode/
SM describe OBFUSCATING_JAVASCRIPT JavaScript which tries to hide the message
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS
It's a missing use line, not a missing file. Add the following line to
spamassassin.raw, among the other use lines at the top:
use Pod::Usage;
I've fixed this on the 2_3_0 CVS branch, so it'll be in 2.31 which might issue
sometime next week.
C
Skip Montanaro wrote:
SM
SM Craig
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ Michael Moncur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DQ
DQ And a few slightly questionable scores:
DQ
DQ - This was 0.87 before. Less and less useful?
DQ score FROM_AND_TO_SAME -2.071
DQ
DQ I think this one should go. It's a common way to send email to a
DQ large
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ Craig R Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DQ
DQ score: BUGZILLA_BUG -2.000 - 0.921
DQ
DQ Moved to the right section of the scores file, and score reverted to -2.0
DQ
DQ But why is it positive? Doesn't it mean there are good messages in
DQ the spam corpus or the rule
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ score X_NOT_PRESENT -1.920
DQ
DQ This one is on my hitlist as well. Didn't work out very well.
DQ
DQ Craig R Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DQ
DQ But it actually turns out to be great at clawing back false
DQ positives. I think we should leave
Michael Moncur wrote:
MM When a new release comes out I like to be anal-retentive and go through the
MM GA second-guessing its scores. This is my report for 2.30.
A valuable service we've come to count on.
MM - RATWARE must be fixed, it was negative last time
MM score RATWARE
Sean Rima wrote:
SR Actually RAM has always been a problem for me because it is not that
SR cheapo here, it pees me off when people say that they can get a strip
SR for $20 when I would be looking at 150+ :(
Plus 17.5% VAT no doubt ;)
C
2.30 coming Real Real Real Soon now! I'm just working through some last second
packaging issues.
C
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS Daniel Quinlan wrote:
MS Michael Moncur [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MS
MS
MS I think the problem is simple: We have a SUBJ_FULL_OF_8BITS rule for 8-bit
MS subjects.
Ok, 2.30 is now official.
SpamAssassin 2.30 (Viking dentist l'orange) Released!
---
Here's the super-brief summary of the major changes from 2.20:
* Rule Fixes/Updates/Additions
* Bugfixes/Typofixes
* Speed improvements
* New
Press Release
SOURCE: Deersoft, Inc.
Deersoft Emerges to Combat Spam
PALO ALTO, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 12, 2002--Spam, unwanted and offensive
email, is an overwhelming problem that many see getting worse every day. Spam
not only wastes individuals' valuable time and attention every time
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC On Friday 14 June 2002 05:49 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
MC
MC Viking: spam song
MC Dentist: Tooth hurty
MC
MC Spam hurts your teeth?
Think about it.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application
running perl 5.6.1-multi-thread.
KO
KO I can see spamc code in 2.20, but not in this one. I've tried the tgz and
KO the zip files with no success.
KO
KO What am I missing?
KO
KO -=Kevin=-
KO
KO -Original Message-
KO From: Craig R Hughes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
KO Sent: Friday, June 14
Ok, I think I've fixed the MANIFEST problems now, so if you already grabbed 2.30
and it failed for you, try again now and you should be OK.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS Application Developer's Conference
August 25-28 in Las
Dial-a-FAQ by Matt Cline :)
Some quick answers (then I'm going home to sleep)
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC I'm an editor at the Open Directory Project, so I'll submit the DeerSoft URL
MC to the appropriate category. To do that, I need to know if SpamAssasin Pro
MC is shareware or just normal
Mail::Audit doesn't let you change the contents of a mail message once it's
created, which SA needs to be able to do easily. So we implemented our own
more-or-less compatible Mail::Audit replacement, called
Mail::SpamAssassin::NoMailAudit -- try using that class instead.
C
Jake Edge wrote:
JE
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS Aside from the image attachments, the only identifying marks are extremely
BS poor written English. If they weren't so freaking huge, I'd read them for
BS the amusement value alone. Last time one slipped through, it included an
BS invitation to visit Mr. River's factory
Actually, using -a with -S should increase the false _negative_ rate, not the
false positive rate, since it will lower the AWL score for a spammy sender to
around 5.
C
Duncan Findlay wrote:
DF On Mon, Jun 10, 2002 at 02:34:54PM +0200, Michael Stauber wrote:
DF Hi Craig,
DF
DF The -S flag
Derrick 'dman' Hudson wrote:
DdH OTOH, saying that DCC is I/O bound means that the limiting factor is
DdH bandwidth. In this case it is network bandwidth. You can put a
DdH super-powerful Athlon in that box, but DCC won't run any faster
DdH because it mostly sits idle waiting for data to come
Excellent, thank Olivier! Great work on keeping up with the translations.
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 19:39:47 +0700 (ICT)
ON From: Olivier Nicole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ON To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ON Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ON Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Freeze for 2.30, call for
OSX startup stuff happens by running scripts called
/Library/StartupItems/ProductName/ProductName -- sniff around in
/Library/StartupItems/ and you'll see what I mean.
If I get bored I might try making an OSX SpamAssassin package.
C
Ian Vännman wrote:
IV Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2002 16:29:22
Matthew Cline wrote:
MC On Sunday 09 June 2002 11:09 pm, Craig R Hughes wrote:
MC
MC you are a nonspam.log submitter, please check out that tag from CVS using:
MC
MC Why just the nonspam.log?
Cos I have plenty of spam to generate a very good spam.log -- all I need is lots
of real mail logs.
C
I'm picturing some developer with a line like:
print Approved for $5000...For $user only...;
sending out a test message sees that it reads:
Approved for ...For fred only...
And saying to himself Doh! $5000 is a bad variable -- I should use '' there!
--
print 'Approved for $5000...For $user
Sean Rima wrote:
SR I thought it would not affect me too much but even with a -m 2 and a -s
SR 61440 I reach a load average of over 15 which cripples my poor old mail
SR box :)
Hmm, my understanding of load is number of processes in the WAIT queue,
which with -m 2 can only be 3 for SA -- so
Sean Rima wrote:
SR But if I disable spamc in Exim (I used your example config) and leave
SR dcc only I never get above a load average of 2.3 and dccd is flooding
SR with remote servers as well, pointing out that I use spamd with -L.
Actually, *not* using -L should *decrease* your load -- in
I answered this question first time you asked it. use -s mail not mail.info
You set the facility, not the level of logging.
C
Steven Núñez wrote:
SN To be exactly, under OpenBSD 3.1, I am starting spamd with the following
SN command line:
SN
SN /usr/bin/spamd -d -a -c -s mail.info
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
JZ Does anyone with a large spam collection have good stats on the
JZ average message size?
SizeCount
-
0-1k89
1k-10k 57170
10k-50k 17062
50k-100k 530
100k-200k 282
200k-500k 128
500k-10M47
That's a
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON The tricky part is maintaining a list of which rules will work only in CVS vs
ON which rules are OK for the nightly distro.
ON
ON I beleive regexpr are stand alone.
Not always -- for example when rarebody gets added as a regexp type.
ON I beleive most eval are.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[Slaughtered Subject line ALERT: Not sure what this belongs under,
it showed up on my system sort of buggered up]
Bryan Hoover [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
STDOUT. If you specify -D and -d together, then spamd should
definitely install
a $SIG{__WARN__}
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Craig R Hughes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
BH Just seems to me that if a program's logging, e.g., SA, is set to go to
BH the screen, then, unless it offers some sort of config. or switch,
BH there's no need for another program to alter its behavior - though
Just a final summary of what got checked in after all this back and forth:
spamd -D [but not -d] will print SA debug messages to stderr
and log its own activities to syslog (as before)
spamd -D -d will log SA debug messages to syslog
Jesse Sheidlower wrote:
JS What do I do to inform Mail::SpamAssassin where my rules directory
JS is for the local install?
new Mail::SpamAssassin({ rules_filename = '/path/to/rules' });
It's called filename but it wants just the path, not the actual filename.
C
Hanser, Kevin wrote:
HK Hello,
HK A message that was sent from on of our mailservers was caught in a
HK spamassassin filter. (No, we don't send spam...) One of the items that was
HK caugh was Message-Id is not valid, according to RFC-2822. I need some
HK help in deciphering the regex that
Duncan Findlay wrote:
DF Would it not be easier to simply release the non-eval rules. Sure,
DF scores wouldn't be ideal. But hey, that's the price you pay :-)
Yes, more or less. Except also excluding other rules like, say, uri rules
before the 2.20 release, or ok_languages, say.
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON The tricky part is that frequently between releases new rules get built which
ON depend on new library features -- so CVS rules won't necessarily work on
ON anything but CVS libs. Certainly at least EvalTests.pm would need to be in the
ON rules update distro
ON
ON I
Bryan Hoover wrote:
BH Craig R Hughes wrote:
BH spamd is the thing which is detaching itself from the terminal and
BH therefore losing SA debug messages;
BH
BH But these messages are dropped when SA is run from .procmailrc aren't
BH they? That is, aren't SA's warning messsage only going
Jan Chrillesen wrote:
JC On Tue, 04 Jun 2002, Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
JC
JC Try doing a cvs update. Or if you downloaded of the web site, try
JC downloading again. (I.e. today's build rather than yesterday's)
JC
JC Same problem here. Both in the cvs snapshot downloaded from the
Bryan Hoover wrote:
BH Craig R Hughes wrote:
BH
BH No, you can't just redirect STDERR, if you're using the -d flag, spamd
BH will
BH detach from the launching tty, and disconnect from that tty's STDERR,
BH STDIN and
BH STDOUT. If you specify -D and -d together, then spamd should
BH
Yes, I just noticed this myself. I think it's a bug in the patch from Bugzilla
#343 -- looks like a copy/paste bug -- how can you expect to read from a
descriptor which perl just told you it failed to open...
I'll delete that line.
C
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS During make test (which BTW I
Frickin' manifest. Ok, I updated it so tonight's build should work.
C
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS On Wed, 5 Jun 2002, Craig R Hughes wrote:
BS
BS Don't know what to tell you guys -- TextCat.pm is definitely in CVS.
BS Maybe there's some weird permissions thing?
BS
BS It's in CVS, but it's
Bryan Hoover wrote:
BH Craig R Hughes wrote:
BH
BH SA when it was
BH first built was not expecting to be used in a detached-daemon
BH environment where
BH its stderr was disconnected -- so when we disconnect it in spamd, it's
BH only
BH polite to let SA continue to communicate
Bryan Hoover wrote:
BH Ryan Hayle wrote:
BH
BH * Progress of Senate anti-spam bill
BH
BH Over a year ago, Sen. Conrad Burns (R-MT) introduced S.630, the CAN
BH SPAM Act of 2001. This bill would require UCE to have a valid return
BH address to facilitate consumers' removal from spam lists.
perldoc IPC::Open2
C
Steve Thomas wrote:
ST Anyone know how to open a file/command (open FOO, |foo), write to it and
ST then read back from it? It seems like something that would be needed fairly
ST often, although I can't say that I've run across the need for it in the
ST couple of years that
SA folks
As some of you may know from reading about it in Simson Garfinkel's recent
column, or from other hints on the grapevine, I have recently incorporated a
company to commercialize a product based on SpamAssassin. I will continue to
dedicate a lot of time to the open source project; this
Bryan Hoover wrote:
BH Harry Putnam wrote:
BH
BH So I think Duncan has hit it, in that -d (daemonize) silences the
BH debug output.
BH
BH Indeed sir. I was woefully ignorant of the behavior.
BH
BH Does that mean too, that when spamd calls SA, SA does not log as usual?
BH My thought was that
Lars Hansson wrote:
LH On Wednesday 05 June 2002 00:20, Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
LH Looks like IT-news in swedish qualifies as part porn whenever something in
LH the news ends (end in swedish == slut). =D
LH
LH Heh, I suspect the number 6 (sex in swedish) will have the same effect ;)
I'd be
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP Duncan Findlay [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
HP
HP [...]
HP
HP Going to the debug output, how can I find the output that pertains to
HP that message? No date no msgid.
HP I don't see why its being overlooked either. Its not a restart
HP problem though. But can't find
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP I've also had to edit a number of other rules score values so
HP probably just got off on the wrong foot.
You're just not going to do a better job of optimizing scores than the GA will,
though you might be seeing some unusual email that's not paralleling the
corpus well.
Bart Schaefer wrote:
BS Hrm. This was reported once before, and I thought the description had
BS been updated then. Sorry, I should have checked.
Ok, I just checked in a better description.
C
___
Don't miss the 2002 Sprint PCS
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP Probably should go back to default, and see what I observe. The
HP first time around a message with FREE FREE in the subject and
HP several times in the body came thru, it may have been a fluke.
There's a rule for that now in CVS. Any repeated word in all caps which
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON I don't see how the Subject contains anything remotely like a unique
ON ID code. Is this right?
ON
ON I did not check at the rule (too lazy.buzy) but maybe the unique ID is
ON characterised by some string at the end of Subject, after a lot of
ON spaces.
Yes, 7 or
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= WECS.COM AUTOMATIC NOTICE =
Dear SPAM proliferation victim,
Your email to WECS.COM was identified as SPAM. This can happen because of
the email's content, its site origin, or bad or forged header information.
Wecs.com person:
please be
Mailing-List: gives a false-positive for me on the google-friend mailing list,
The ant developers list (apache/jakarta), and a couple others. Looks like ezmlm
inserts it, since many of the lines say run by exmlm at the end.
I get a lot of X-EM-Version and X-EM-Registration as well, looks like
It *is* in the documentation -- at least was just now when I read the
Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf manpage -- but then I'm behind on my email, so it might
not have been there when you wrote this. ok_locales seems to be one of the
better documented config options!
C
Michael Moncur wrote:
MM Daniel
Daniel,
look in the wordfreqs/ directory of the distribution.
C
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ Craig R Hughes writes:
DQ
DQ Better than a straight dictionary of single words is a dictionary of
DQ phrases, weighted by their frequency in spam vs nonspam. Hmm, wait,
DQ that sounds familiar somehow
I'm guessing the original author actually wants to blacklist the word fuck, but
is too timid to actually type that to a mailing list of people (s)he doesn't
know.
C
Andrew Kohlsmith wrote:
AK I want to score FSCK more highly, and flag it as spam if it appears in
AK the subject line. Can
This isn't a permanent answer, but you can do:
perl -n -e 'if(/\b([a-Z]{3,}\b).*\1/) { print $1 repeated: $_; }' message
It would be neat to have the SA report give line numbers next to the rule
descriptions. I like bug #384
C
Duncan Findlay wrote:
DF On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 05:05:45PM
If you look at a bug in bugzilla, in the header info at the top of the ticket,
there's a link that says Create an attachment. Click that, then follow the
directions.
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
ON extract from your
Well, I think the major problem is quality control on new rules. Not
infrequently, the first pass at a new rule (particularly eval rules) can cause
problems on particularly odd input messages -- normally having a rule in CVS for
a while before release allows at least a few dozen people to have
dman wrote:
d Also keep a way to test the raw text itself, since some junk is easily
d identified by the raw format and not so obvious after it has been
d prepared for display.
Well, we can have the charset translation stuff happen between rawbody and body
-- so rawbody will have the original
dman wrote:
d I think we need both raw and decoded header tests. Checking for
d things like the UNKNOWN charset could be useful. Do you know of a
d legitimate mailer that inserts that code?
Makes sense -- parallel rawbody and body with rawheader and header.
C
I will be doing an SA release very soon now, which will fold in all the new
rules, rescored through a new GA run.
C
Andrew Stephen wrote:
AS Can someone tell me if there is an automatic process to keep the mail rules
AS updates from the contributions of people from around the world.
AS
AS I
dman wrote:
d The other bug is in SA. IIRC it only properly parses
d [real-name] [address]
d addresses and not
d [address] ([real name])
d
d If I'm right on that, then you can't whitelist an address of that
d format. I may be wrong, though, and SA might handle that format
d correctly
Matt Sergeant wrote:
MS Unfortunately the answer is no. But it's something that I *absolutely*
MS need in the next couple of months, so expect it to be worked on within
MS that timeframe.
It's also something that I absolutely need in the next couple of months.
MS The reason the answer is no is
Better than a straight dictionary of single words is a dictionary of phrases,
weighted by their frequency in spam vs nonspam. Hmm, wait, that sounds familiar
somehow... ;) I suppose we ought to turn spam phrases back on I'll work
on that right now, and check it in once working.
C
Tony
Rob Winters wrote:
RW SA does not give any credit to the cumulative effect that would be obvious
RW to any human reading the tests= line, let alone the message itself. I
RW mean, look at *this* one!
This is currently true, and is basically a function of how the score-setting
(and score
Harry Putnam wrote:
HP Subject: *SPAM* Cron root@reader /usr/sbin/netdate time.jtan.com
HP [...]
HP X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-97.9 required=2.0 tests=FROM_MALFORMED,\
HP TO_MALFORMED,SUPERLONG_LINE,USER_IN_WHITELIST version=2.20
HP X-Spam-Level:
HP
HP So I guess whitelisting doesn't work
dman wrote:
d | whitelist_from *root*
d
d How about
d whitelist_from *root*Cron Daemon*
I think the whitelist checks against the address part, and not the Real Name
or (Comment Name) parts. So *root* or root* should work here.
d ...
d | OK, yeah, that looks like a good way to go. Maybe
Attached are my procmail rc file and my postfix master config file. proccyrus
is the transport I use. Hope it helps.
C
dman wrote:
d On Wed, May 29, 2002 at 10:34:50AM -0700, Paul Bauer wrote:
d | I am currently trying to hand mail from
d | postfix-procmail-SA-cyrus.
d
d A better diagram
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ Kevin Layer [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DQ
DQ I have a spam filter of my own, and I'd like to add blacklist
DQ capabilities to it. Rather than reinvent the wheel, is the blacklist
DQ module usable separately? I looked at the FAQ and browsed the docs,
DQ but didn't
It's now on again in CVS -- still need to rescore the phrases against the
updated corpus, but the scores in there now are decent.
C
rODbegbie wrote:
r This reminds me... Whatever happened to the discussion of turning Spam
r Phrases back on? I think Craig said it was something he'd be looking
Rob Mangiafico wrote:
RM Hello,
RM
RM With spamd running (SA 2.20), and per user auto-whitelist enabled, are
RM there any problems or limits with the number of entries in a user's
RM auto-whitelist.db file and its effect on server performance? As the
RM program runs longer, some people's
DCC is only in the CVS version at the moment, not yet in the released version.
The web page is built from the released version, so DCC isn't covered there yet.
If you get the CVS version, a make will generate HTML and text files in the
doc directory; or you can just use man
-s specifies only the facility, not the level. So you should use -s mail not
-s mail.info.
Steven Núñez wrote:
SN Hello All,
SN
SN I've just installed the latest version of spamd, and everything seems to
SN work well with one exception. The -s flag, that is supposed to indicate
SN which syslog
Olivier, could you attach the new file to a bugzilla ticket? It's hard to
extract from your original email.
Thanks,
C
Olivier Nicole wrote:
ON
ON There was a typo in this one, I missed the 96
ON
ON lang fr describe DATE_IN_FUTURE_96_XX L'entête Date: est plus de 96 heures
après la
I have a corpus of about 400,000 messages, against which I run mass-check every
so often.
C
Skip Montanaro wrote:
SM
SM SM Aside from longer execution time, what's the downside of disabling
SM SM network checks in the mass-check script?
SM
SM Craig Well, speed, clogging your pipe,
I had it at 32.1
C
Tony L. Svanstrom wrote:
TLS
TLS Hmmm... just had to ask... what score did this get by the latest and greatest
TLS version of SA?
TLS
TLS
TLS Subject: ** 30.50/04.50 ** [SAtalk] New describe in French and a new version of
TLS the tool that extracts lateste rules
TLS
http://bugzilla.spamassassin.org/
Allows you to be notified by email when something gets fixed too :)
C
John Horne wrote:
JH Hello,
JH
JH Is there a wish list for spamassassin at all?
JH
JH I am trying to see if we can get some form of dynamic 'required_hits' value
JH sent to spamc/spamd
Daniel Quinlan wrote:
DQ David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DQ
DQ Perhaps such contributions should be gzipped for more than just
DQ bandwidth conservation :-)
DQ
DQ No, just submit a bug, then submit patches and such as attachments to
DQ the bug. Or if you don't want to use attachments, put
1 - 100 of 437 matches
Mail list logo
