[SAtalk] New TRIPWIRE rule set, hitting PGP messages

2004-01-14 Thread Josh Endries
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Heh whoops that subject probably didn't make much sense, I'll resend with a proper subject, my apologies. Rut roh! I just received an encrypted email from a coworker and this is what SA gave me. It got slammed with tripwire rules (it isn't supposed to,

[SAtalk] [Fwd: Re: mtier1 spam problem]

2004-01-14 Thread Josh Endries
Rut roh! I just received an encrypted email from a coworker and this is what SA gave me. It got slammed with tripwire rules (it isn't supposed to, right?). I noticed the .cf doesn't have anything for actual PGP messages, only signatures. The stripped-down message (okay okay, the PGP lines from it)

[SAtalk] Wacky postmaster whitelist questions

2003-12-10 Thread Josh Endries
Hey guys and gals, I get a lot of postmaster emails, and I'm trying to whitelist them so they aren't marked as spam. Even though many are bounces due to spam, I would like to whitelist them so I don't miss any legit emails. I turned bayes off because it learned these as spam. Anyway I haven't f

Re: [SAtalk] KMail filter

2003-11-24 Thread Josh Endries
Clive Dove wrote: On the assumption that the kmail filter was picking up the string BAYES in the X-Spam-Status header, I changed the rule to this: X-Spam-Statuscontains Yes, hits= Can I rely on the changed rule or should I use some other rule instead? I had this problem too and realized tha

[SAtalk] DCC/Razor/RBLs

2003-11-17 Thread Josh Endries
I'm looking into testing Razor and/or DCC and have a few questions I can't seem to get answers to from the docs (sorry if I missed them). before I get to that I just want to clarify that using systems like Razor, Pyzor, and DCC are different or separate from using RBLs. If so, what list(s) does

Re: [SAtalk] Run spamd as root ?

2003-11-17 Thread Josh Endries
David B Funk wrote: spamd will not run as root, it is a security risk. If you start it as root and you do not tell it who you want to run as (IE leave off the '-u' option) it will automagically switch to user "nobody". Actually, spamd will run as root. It seems to run as root perfectly fine for me

[SAtalk] implementing site-wide bayesian filtering

2003-10-24 Thread Josh Endries
Hiya, I'm playing around with spamd for a few accounts on our mail server via procmail and I would like to set up bayesian filtering. Everywhere I read says that per-user is the way to go with bayesian filters versus one big site-wide database, because everyone gets different spam and ham, etc