[SAtalk] FW: Postmaster notify: see transcript for details

2003-07-01 Thread L. Walsh
Can anyone make sense of this? I'm not sure, but it looks some weird error happened when sending some message to the spam-talk-admin weird... Got 3 of these in a row...1:47a, 1:50a, 2:11a > -Original Message- > From: Mail Delivery Subsystem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: M

RE: [SAtalk] I hate Mandatory Mail Filtering!!!! - speakeasy.net bites the dust. (was "I hate SpamAsssassin")

2003-06-10 Thread L. Walsh
Here are the headers from your message: Server-1.1.2c-csav (Processed in 0.468303 secs); 10 Jun 2003 12:25:35 - X-AmikaGuardian-Id: mail10.speakeasy.net105524793523629339 X-AmikaGuardian-Category: AN:Obvious Clues : 0.3 X-AmikaGuardian-Category: AN:Spam Headers : 0.3 X-AmikaGuardian-Category:

RE: [SAtalk] I hate Mandatory Mail Filtering!!!! - speakeasy.net bites the dust. (was "I hate SpamAsssassin")

2003-06-10 Thread L. Walsh
> -Original Message- > From: Simon Byrnand [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > A 0.5 second delay scanning a message means exactly that - > that your email > will arrive 0.5 seconds later. No sooner, no later. How you > figure that you > have to multiply that by number of users they have I have n

RE: [SAtalk] I hate Mandatory Mail Filtering!!!! - speakeasy.net bites the dust. (was "I hate SpamAsssassin")

2003-06-09 Thread L. Walsh
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Kenneth Porter > Sounds like a fetchmail bug. What do the fetchmail folk say? --- The fetchmail documentation says that it _tries_ to get the sender (or resender) of the mail and reconstruct t

[SAtalk] I hate Mandatory Mail Filtering!!!! - speakeasy.net bites the dust. (was "I hate SpamAsssassin")

2003-06-07 Thread L. Walsh
Along the lines of the previous user's complaints, regarding filtering. My ISP instituted a spam filter Amika-Guardian(?). Before they rolled it out they said we'd be able to turn off the filtering -- what they didn't tell you was that you could only turn off spam filtering, not all filtering. It

[SAtalk] RE: "From" header being rewritten

2003-05-28 Thread L. Walsh
> So when you disable spamassassin, the headers are written > correctly? === Apparently not. This is what I'm seeing now -- it is the first line that is important/different (arrows added are mine) > From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue May 27 17:28:06 2003 Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [SAtalk] I hate SpamAssassin

2003-05-27 Thread L. Walsh
l you to go configure something first, then turn the package on when things are setup the way you want them. But the civil approach to asking a question seems to get alot less attention: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On >