Would a rule that adds points for no pingable web site for a domain
be useful? If spam comes in from [EMAIL PROTECTED], could
http://www.example.com be tested? If you get a 404 or no response,
give the message a couple points. Just an idea, Mike
--
Michael Clark, Webmaster
Center for
the subject. Thanks, Mike
--
Michael Clark, Webmaster
Center for Democracy and Technology
1634 Eye Street NW, Suite 1100
Washington, DC 20006
voice: 202-637-9800
http://www.cdt.org/
Join our Activist Network! Your participation can make a difference
-0400 6/5/03, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jun 05, 2003 at 05:49:48PM -0400, Michael Clark wrote:
Is there a rule for matching the username in the subject line? I've
been getting lots of spam with a subject line of "mclark,
information for you" or "webmaster turn back ti
I need to upgrade a few mail servers copies of SpamAssassin from 2.11
to 2.42 (and one from 2.01). Should I delete the ancient existing
copy, and then install, or simply install 2.42 per the standard
instructions? The old versions are working fine. Thanks, Michael
--
Michael Clark, Webmaster
Never mind. I'm a fool. It is working fine, and reading from the
correct ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file. I'll be over on the corner.
That's the odd thing about computers. They only do exactly what
they're told to do. Mike
>I thought the < looked odd. But it doesn't work either way. But is
>t
I thought the < looked odd. But it doesn't work either way. But is
the -c even needed? I thought the users_pref under .spamassassin was
read automatically.
>On 13 March 2002, Rob McMillin said:
>> -p only reads user scores. Did you try
>>
>> :0fw:
>> | spamassassin -P -c
My user_prefs aren't being read. It seems that the user_prefs should
be read automagically when processing mail. I added -c
/home/mclark/.spamassassin/user_prefs and then -p
/home/mclark/.spamassassin/user_prefs to the .procmailrc and they
user_prefs aren't processed.
Complete /home/mclark/.p
