.
- --
:: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ ::
Sorry, son! I didn't know you, Jay Leno and
a monkey were bathing a clown.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3-nr1 (Windows XP)
iD8DBQE/akIvN/YdXIyAw18RAp6tAJ9pOQCPdyk24niFSk5M55JNML5kYQCfZZC0
plyiBcXNdR5BjbQJqNj09xE=
=hMLE
Personally, I think BANG_OPRAH is the most disturbing test name. What a
horrible thought.
rOD.
--
:: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ ::
So what do you do? Oh yeah, I wait tables too.
No, I haven't heard your band,
cause you guys are pretty new
Ben Johansen wrote:
So Why is the reply-to set to this
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It isn't.
HTH. HAND.
rOD.
--
:: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ ::
So what do you do? Oh yeah, I wait tables too.
No, I haven't heard your band,
cause you guys are pretty new
.
rOD.
--
:: rODbegbie :: http://www.groovymother.com/ ::
I think I'm in love.
Probably just hungry.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Etnus, makers of TotalView, The best
thread debugger on the planet. Designed with thread debugging
Rob Bos wrote:
This morning I woke up with a system load around thirty
Something similarly wacky happened here today. My mailserver was freaking
out: load at about 30 and suchlike.
Very interesting.
(qmail - maildrop - spamc - spamd, running 2.43 release)
rOD.
--
Fast! Fast! Faster!
rODbegbie wrote:
Something similarly wacky happened here today. My mailserver was freaking
out: load at about 30 and suchlike.
Oh, and the base of my machine is RedHat 7.3 (although there's not a great
deal still on it that came from those RPMs!)
rOD.
--
He gave his life for tourism
Matthew Boeckman wrote:
I am running spamassassin sitewide for my company, using spamd/spamc
and sendmail. I think I have misunderstood something from the
documentation:
spamd compiles and stores the system-wide rules on start-up to speed up
processing. If you edit the local.cf file, you
Matthew Cline wrote:
Not in my inbox. And 1% of
recipients reply? How sad. Yet another blow to my faith in
humanity...
Have you tried replying to them? It's *fun*! Try asking them complex
questions, and watch them answer in incredibly tortured English which must
take them hours to write.
Greg Jamison wrote:
The spamassassin service is running, but spam of all kinds is still
pouring through. Any ideas on what I need to do to get it working? Any
input is greatly appreciated. Thanks!!
From the RPM notes:
To enable spamassassin, if you are receiving mail locally, simply add
this
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1166564forum_id=4258
Looks like Razor2 should be given a 0 score in the same manner as the
SpamCop blacklist.
rOD.
--
I'm as mad as hell and I'm not going to take this anymore!
Doing the blogging thang again at
Steve Thomas wrote:
The easiest way to install SA would be to run:
perl -MCPAN -e 'install Mail::SpamAssassin'
and answer yes to any questions about following dependencies.
In my experience, CPAN certainly is the easiest way to install and/or
upgrade SA. SHouldn't we recommend its usage on
Hess, Mtodd, /mth wrote:
I hate to bring this up, but I see more and more spams that contain
very little, if any, text. Instead, most of the spam text is in a
graphic image. How will we be able to detect those as spam? OCR?
There are still ways to analyse it.
1) Analyse the headers. Are
Justin Mason wrote:
As a result I'm now collecting a corpus of nonspam SCEs, using a few
common FP'ing SCE sources. BTW if anyone knows of more FP'ing SCE
sources, I'd appreciate if they posted them; the more the better.
The e-mail club at www.newbury.com is a good one -- It's a weekly list
Bart Schaefer wrote:
Just to demonstrate that even a score of 10 or more doesn't guarantee
that something is spam,
Oh, absolutely. Have a look at the attached email, which scores over 15
points with recent CVS.
SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results
SPAM: 15.9 hits, 5 required;
SPAM: * 1.5
John Covici wrote:
I am using spamassassin 2.40 and I am getting 8.6 hits for the non
spam sample -- should I change the threshold or what?
Teehee.
First up, if you're new to SA, you really should use a release version,
since the code is tested and the scores settled upon by the GA engine.
Matt Kettler wrote:
Hmm, I think that Marc, being one of the most active and prolific
posters to this list
Prolific != Useful.
certainly understands SA much better than most.
Certainly better than I do, and I suspect better than you do rOD.
Yeah. What do I know? Only been contributing to
Kevin Gagel wrote:
Based on the following header info, is my rule built correctly?
Received: from (127.0.0.1) by MAIL3041.flowgo.com (PowerMTA(TM)
v1.5); Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:19:56 -0700
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I want to make a rule that will tag it bassed on the
Darian Rafie wrote:
I've noticed two recent spam emails, both from mortgage lenders, with
some nonsense like this attached at the end. Is this an attempt to
throw SA off the trail?
Could be -- Decrease the chance of hitting a spam phrase score by padding
out the message?
Could also be
DCC was working fine on my system. I installed the latest CVS, and now I
see this in my maillog:
Jul 11 12:02:49 blazing spamd[5952]: debug: DCC is not available: system
failed
Did the fix to stop the DCC not found messages cause SA to stop finding
DCC?
Anyone else?
rOD.
--
Sell to them the
Jim Hale wrote:
I know that SquirrelMail has something that will do it, but I'm using
the Horde Suite.
Horde are working on just such a package, called sam. It's not released,
but it is in their CVS repository. I grabbed a copy last week and had a wee
bit of a poke, but didn't have much luck
Matt Sergeant wrote:
Alternatively, yes, I'd use sourceforge. They're crap, but probably
the best crap we have ;-)
Or as the old Your Sinclair t-shirts used to say: It's CRAP! But in a
funky, skillo sort of way
rOD.
--
Everybody's screwed up in their own special way!
I'm Mr. Punchy!
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
As someone else stated, 2.3x doesn't support Razor2 yet (although
patches are available via Bugzilla). SA doesn't look for the razor-*
programs, it calls the modules directly. When you installed Razor2
it didn't get rid of the Razor1 modules, and they're named
Lars Hansson wrote:
Eh, shouting down? Matt Perry's message is anything but constructive.
I'd be pretty pissed off too if someone tried to tell me how to do my
job and basicly accused me of being incompetent.
*Releasing* a version of razor which fails to actually check spam
Deanna Phillips wrote:
dcc_add_header 1
to my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf and restart spamd, I'm not
seeing the header. This setting does work when I put it into my
~/.spamassassin/user_prefs file and run spamassassin -t.
It's working fine here when in my local.cf file. Try deleting
Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later.
rOD.
--
I think I'm in love.
Probably just hungry.
Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/
- Original Message -
From: Vipul Ved Prakash [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL
rODbegbie wrote:
Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later.
Initial signs are promising. Nothing seems broken in the SA integration.
Coolio!
rOD.
--
You have the right to remain *fabulous*
Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com
Michael Moncur wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.8 required=5.0
tests=FROM_MISSING,DATE_MISSING,MISSING
_HEADERS,SUBJ_MISSING version=2.20
I should mention that this only started happening (to me) sometime
yesterday when I installed the latest CVS, so if this is a
spamassassin problem it's
Jim Scott wrote:
Any chance someone is willing to share some code to put together a
nice web inteface for end users to configure personal settings for
SpamAssassin on Redhat 7.x with MySQL and PHP or perhaps even just a
perl script?
The lovely chaps at Horde (www.horde.org) are working on
Jeremy Zawodny wrote:
Right, his rule would only trigger if SA had already decided it was
SPAM. So it's not *that* bad. I wonder how often you'd see PORN
rules triggered in non-porn spam. That's the only problem, right?
Quite often, I'm afraid.PORN_* matches 753/4129 of my nonspam
On Sun, 9 Jun 2002, Craig R. Hughes said:
Anyone have any thoughts for a cool release name for 2.30?
Chinese Dentist?
You know... the old joke:
Q. What time does a chinaman go to the dentist?
A. Tooth-hurty.
rOD.
(non-PC)
--
Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge and Strawhenge.
Just tried upgrading my system to SA 2.30pre, but spamd isn't behaving well.
All of a sudden, I'm getting the following message in my maillog during
startup:
Jun 10 14:23:50 blazing spamd[981]: Use of uninitialized value in scalar
chomp at
Vivek Khera wrote:
But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam as
well?
[rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep PORN | wc
197 788 40835
So, about 4% of my non-spam matches a PRON rule.
rOD.
--
Before Stonehenge, there was Woodhenge
Vivek Khera wrote:
r == rOD rODbegbie writes:
r Vivek Khera wrote:
But how many of those were scoring 5 or more to be flagged as spam
as well?
r [rod@blazing masses]$ cat nonspam-rODbegbie.log | grep ^Y | grep
PORN | wc r 197 788 40835
r So, about 4% of my non-spam matches
Craig R Hughes wrote:
It's now
been quite a while since our last release, and so I'm going to do the
2.30 release imminently. I will post a separate thread message with
the usual freeze request plus requests for nonspam.log submissions.
Just a thought, but should we wait for the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
= WECS.COM AUTOMATIC NOTICE =
Teehee.
Yet another example of why bouncing/devnulling mail tagged as spam is a bad
idea :)
bhoover -- you might want to consider whitelist_toing spamassassin-talk.
rOD.
--
I'll hide somewhere, and you'll wear big
Patrice Fournier wrote:
Has anyone ever seen a legitimate email with an X-Mailer: header of
OutLook Express 3.14159?
I'm also seeing this here. I'd agree with the rule being added.
rOD.
--
I'm in love with rock and roll
and I'll be out all night
Doing the blogging thang again at
Rob Winters wrote:
How about a bonus for cumulative effect? Why not do a second-level
analysis after scoring; something like:
3 positive score matches - add 1.0
4 positive score matches - add 2.0
5 positive score matches - add 4.0
6 positive score matches - add 8.0
This reminds me...
Matt Thoene wrote:
Is there a searchable spamassassin mail list archive somewhere? I'd
search the archive for the answer but...
There's a search box on the left-hand-side of
https://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?forum_id=1981
rOD.
--
Sorry, son! I didn't know you, Jay Leno and
a
Doug Crompton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is this nonsense? They added headers to track abuse? This is abuse!
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse,
please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - crompton.com
Nah. My guess is that since SpamCop
Jose Celestino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the idea behind spam assassin is indeed great, the problem is that after
about 3 minutes the server load goes to:
mail:/var/log/qmail# uptime
18:15:06 up 6 days, 21:40, 3 users, load average: 15.22, 8.96, 7.77
How are you running it? spamc/spamd
Title: User has been terminated
Thought some of you might be happy to see
this...
rOD.
--I think I'm in love.Probably just hungry.
Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/
- Original Message -
From: abuse
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 3:19 PM
Subject: User
Sidney Markowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So for the purpose of stripping out comments in HTML you would want to
match from a leading '!--' to a trailing '--' and you would
specifically not want to match other legal SGML comment syntax that
would not be recognized by most browsers.
But, if
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I currently use SpamCop, OsiruSoft, and NJABL for RBL on my Postfix
implementation. How can I add NJABL to SA?
I have the following lines in my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf file:
header RCVD_IN_NJABLeval:check_rbl('relay', 'dnsbl.njabl.org')
describe
Brian Kendig wrote:
I have a free reporting account on SpamCop. I suppose I could put
a line into my procmailrc which forwards all my spam to my SpamCop
reporting address; then SpamCop will send me back a confirmation
email for each spam thus reported. That's a little messy, though,
since
Matt Sergeant [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
99.9% of companies have the fact that they can read and monitor your
email and web browsing and just about everything you do with your
computer as part of your contract of employment.
Which is why all my emailing, web-browsing and IMing goes through a
Spotted at the bottom of a recent
spam:
TIRED OF HITTING THE DELETE KEY? New technology STOPS SPAMand harmful email viruses BEFORE they reach your computer...FACT: Now you CAN take back 100% control of your email!
rOD.
-- "Sorry, son!
According to a discussion on the procmail list, using the X-message-flag
header in this way depends on something that the server does, not just on
using Outlook. E.g., there was mention of the message being marked as
flagged by an IMAP server.
Can you verify that X-message-flag should work
Quoting William R Ward [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
There are whitelist_from and whitelist_to but blacklist_from is
the only form for blacklist. I'd like to propose that blacklist_to
would be a good idea. Is there a reason why this is not there?
There is a sneaky work-around... If you are just
I have found that this issue only happens when Razor *does not* need to run
a server discovery. If I remove .razor.lst, spamassassin starts up fine.
As a temporary hack, I've added 'force_discovery' = 1 to the %options in
the razor_lookup method in Mail/SpamAssassin/Dns.pm, because I'm only
Yes, a header will contain a line that says:
X-eGroups-Return: ...
But where do I add such rule? In head_test? I see some Perl regex in
there,
but also several eval functions.
Put it in your /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf. Something like:
header YAHOOGROUPSX-eGroups-Return =~ /\S/
I'm receiving an increasing number of Spams for porn sites hosted by
splitrock.net which are operating on port 81 (see URLs below).
1) Anyone else getting them?
2) Is anyone adverse to adding a rule to catch http://.*:81/ into
SpamAssassin?
3) Shouldn't these be getting points for being fully
Yeah, I'm not sure why, but the PORN_3 rule wants 3 naughty words on a
single line before it'll trigger. Can anyone think of a reason why it
shouldn't be just one occurrence?
The problem is that some of the words in the list can be used in quite
innocent contexts (Amateur, Teen and Webcam
Two questions:
1) Why did this mail not get marked as spam, despite getting 5.0 hits?
2) Why did it not register as HTML text with no plaintext?
rOD.
--
That's what you get for not hailing to the chimp
From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Jan 27 23:43:52 2002
Received: (qmail 16600 invoked from
Perhaps something that looks for a % symbol between http://; and the next
/ (or whitespace). I'm no regex wiz, but would
http://[\w\.-]*%[\w\.-]*/?
do the job?
rOD.
--
To me, clowns aren't funny. In fact, they're kind of scary.
I've wondered where this started and I think it goes back
to
54 matches
Mail list logo
