On October 22, 2002 07:17 pm, Michael Moncur wrote:
> > Hmm? I upgraded to 2.43 the day it was released and noticed all
[snip]
> It sounds like your particular situation isn't one where
> autowhitelisting will do much good.
My conclusion too. I use tmda to handle my 1-1 type correspondence
> Hmm? I upgraded to 2.43 the day it was released and noticed all my
> spam email was being let through after about 2 weeks. I run spamd with
> the -a (autowhitelist optio) on. I have since turned off the
> auto-whitelist option and everything works fine since.
Version 2.43 definitely fixed
On Tue, Oct 22, 2002 at 06:58:31PM -0700, joe wrote:
> On October 22, 2002 06:26 pm, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> > > But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is
> > > no longer recognized as spam!
> > >
> > > Is t
On October 22, 2002 06:26 pm, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> > But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is
> > no longer recognized as spam!
> >
> > Is this an intended behaviour?
>
> Yes... sort of. It WAS intended be
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 03:08:47AM +0200, Steffen Evers wrote:
> But it does exactlly the opposite: AWL gives -5.0 points, so it is no
> longer recognized as spam!
>
> Is this an intended behaviour?
Yes... sort of. It WAS intended behaviour at the time. But we are
wiser now, and that change was r
Hi!
Using 2.42 (Debian testing package on woody)
AWL seems not to work the way it supposed to be:
I have removed the AWL files in order to reset the AWL data.
Than I have piped through the same spam message (9.50 hits, 5 required)
several times with 'spamassassin -a < spam-mail > spam-mail1.resul
