Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-16 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]: We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug for the SQL rewrite for the Bayes code that's currently sitting in a bug report. 'Tis definitely multi-host safe, and 'twould make my life easier... How's this

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-16 Thread Michael Parker
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]: How's this holding up under heavy load with large clusters? How much overhead for either the SQL server or SA? Having not written the code, and not being in a

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-16 Thread Andreas Stollar
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Billy Huddleston wrote: Are you all load balancing these? If so, are you doing it at the SMTP level or using SPAMD ? I'm getting ready to implement a 2 node system with qmail..and wondering if using a single SMTP machine calling spamc against a cluster of SA machines

[SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Mike Jackson
If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition with a system-wide Bayesian database and share it across all the boxes? In our setup, we have three boxes dedicated to doing SA filtering, all running the same version of FreeBSD, and it sure would be nice to be able to

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Rocky Olsen
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this? On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 13:31, Mike Jackson wrote: If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition with a system-wide Bayesian database and share it across all

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Damian Gerow
Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]: I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this? We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug for the SQL rewrite for the Bayes code that's currently

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Michael Parker
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]: I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this? We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Andreas Stollar
, Rocky Olsen wrote: Date: 15 Jan 2004 14:37:47 -0700 From: Rocky Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe? I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this? On Thu

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread David B Funk
On 15 Jan 2004, Rocky Olsen wrote: I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this? On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 13:31, Mike Jackson wrote: If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition with a system-wide

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Ed Walker
at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote: Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]: I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this? We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug for the

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?

2004-01-15 Thread Billy Huddleston
with qmail and spamd all running on the same machine.. Thanks, Billy - Original Message - From: Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:55 PM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe? Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37