Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]:
We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug
for the
SQL rewrite for the Bayes code that's currently sitting in a bug
report.
'Tis definitely multi-host safe, and 'twould make my life easier...
How's this
On Fri, Jan 16, 2004 at 10:44:04AM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Ed Walker ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 20:04]:
How's this holding up under heavy load with large clusters? How much
overhead for either the SQL server or SA?
Having not written the code, and not being in a
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Billy Huddleston wrote:
Are you all load balancing these? If so, are you doing it at the SMTP level
or using SPAMD ? I'm getting ready to implement a 2 node system with
qmail..and wondering if using a single SMTP machine calling spamc against a
cluster of SA machines
If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition
with a system-wide Bayesian database and share it across all the boxes? In
our setup, we have three boxes dedicated to doing SA filtering, all running
the same version of FreeBSD, and it sure would be nice to be able to
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 13:31, Mike Jackson wrote:
If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition
with a system-wide Bayesian database and share it across all
Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug for the
SQL rewrite for the Bayes code that's currently
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another
, Rocky Olsen wrote:
Date: 15 Jan 2004 14:37:47 -0700
From: Rocky Olsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
On Thu
On 15 Jan 2004, Rocky Olsen wrote:
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 13:31, Mike Jackson wrote:
If you have multiple SA filtering boxes, is it safe to NFS-mount a partition
with a system-wide
at 04:55:08PM -0500, Damian Gerow wrote:
Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37]:
I too would greatly appreciate any information - as we have 9 boxes
doing Spam scanning. Anyone tried this?
We've got four.. And I'm going to insert yet another shameless plug
for the
with qmail and spamd all running on the same machine..
Thanks, Billy
- Original Message -
From: Damian Gerow [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 4:55 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes NFS safe?
Thus spake Rocky Olsen ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [15/01/04 16:37
11 matches
Mail list logo