At 07:15 AM 12/16/2003, Marcio Merlone wrote:
Back on-list, wouldn't be useful to make a rule to white-list a message
when sent to abuse@, but only when it has no BCC or tons of rcpts? So,
our abuse@ team could receive spam complains and still not become some
kind of open relay...
It's impossible
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 13:18:54 -0500
Matt Kettler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At 08:13 AM 12/15/2003, you wrote:
> >On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:25:38 -0500
> >Terry Milnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(...)
> > > > whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(...)
> as a further off-list clarific
On Mon, 15 Dec 2003 07:25:38 -0500
Terry Milnes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Have you tried dropping the comma after [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't see
> the comma included in the spamassassin.conf man page.
>
> Marcio Merlone wrote:
> > whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yes,
Have you tried dropping the comma after [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't see
the comma included in the spamassassin.conf man page.
Marcio Merlone wrote:
Hello all,
I think my whitelist_to is not working, can someone help me?
On /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]# grep [EMAIL PR
Hello all,
I think my whitelist_to is not working, can someone help me?
On /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]# grep [EMAIL PROTECTED] /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf
whitelist_to[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] spam]#
And, on a spam report:
[EM
