Re: [SAtalk] Re: X-Originating-IP isn't a number

2004-01-26 Thread Robert Menschel
Hello Who, Friday, January 23, 2004, 5:08:57 AM, you wrote: WK> Anthony Martinez wrote: >> I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number. Hotmail >> always puts the dotted quad in the header. WK> I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add WK> an

Re: [SAtalk] Re: X-Originating-IP isn't a number

2004-01-23 Thread Matt Kettler
At 07:08 AM 1/23/04 -0600, Who Knows wrote: I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add any rules for them yet because all the ones I have been receiving seem to also contain a list of words that can only be there to spoil baysian tracking. Is there anyway to avoid add

Re: [SAtalk] Re: X-Originating-IP isn't a number

2004-01-23 Thread Brent J. Nordquist
On Fri, 23 Jan 2004, Who Knows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Anthony Martinez wrote: > > I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number. > > I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add > any rules for them yet because all the ones I have been recei

[SAtalk] Re: X-Originating-IP isn't a number

2004-01-23 Thread Who Knows
Anthony Martinez wrote: I got a spam today where the X-Originating-IP header wasn't a number. Hotmail always puts the dotted quad in the header. I have been receiving a good many of these lately. I am hestant to add any rules for them yet because all the ones I have been receiving seem to also co