On Monday 13 October 2003 13:44, Rich Puhek wrote:
> No. Read carefully, Wacker didn't say that, the author of the article
> did.
On more careful reading, you're right.
I apologize for my rant.
> Heh, I've been pro-Sendmail for a long time. The only thing that
> comes close to changing my mind
Jeff Lasman wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:16, Todd Schuldt wrote:
Full article at:
URL: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-5089977.html
So let me get this straight,
Rand Wacker, director of product strategy and planning for e-mail
software maker Sendmail, says
The attack on the software
tware.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Lasman
> Sent: Monday, October 13, 2003 2:15 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] SA makes ZDNet news
>
>
> On Monday 13 October 2003 07:16, Todd Schuldt wrote:
>
> > Full article at:
> >
On Monday 13 October 2003 07:16, Todd Schuldt wrote:
> Full article at:
> URL: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-5089977.html
So let me get this straight,
Rand Wacker, director of product strategy and planning for e-mail
software maker Sendmail, says
The attack on the software's filtering proce
Full article at:
URL: http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1104-5089977.html
Regards,
Todd
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects.
See the people who have HELPED US provi
