On Monday 13 October 2003 13:44, Rich Puhek wrote: > No. Read carefully, Wacker didn't say that, the author of the article > did.
On more careful reading, you're right. I apologize for my rant. > Heh, I've been pro-Sendmail for a long time. The only thing that > comes close to changing my mind is the "Why Commercial Sendmail?" > page on sendmail.com. Basicly the answer is "Because we've made a > concerted effort to make Sendmail unusable by mere mortals". Those of us who've used sendamail for many years have developed some beyond-mortal abilities then <smile>; I've always attacked sendmail.cf directly <smile>. But I am leaving it behind. My guess is that the company's emphasis on selling commercial product and services has kept them from moving along with the open source base. So now there are (imho) better choices. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US Professional Internet Services & Support / Consulting / Colocation Our blists address used on lists is for list email only Phone +1 909 324-9706, or see: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"; ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. SourceForge.net hosts over 70,000 Open Source Projects. See the people who have HELPED US provide better services: Click here: http://sourceforge.net/supporters.php _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
