On Monday, August 25, 2003 @ 3:24:20 AM [-0700], Simon Byrnand wrote:
On Friday, August 22, 2003 @ 1:56:26 PM [-0700], Tim Buck wrote:
So I've reverted back to SA 2.55. Anyone else see this behavior?
Tim...yes. I had an almost identical problem. Two or three users
suddenly started getting a
On Friday, August 22, 2003 @ 1:56:26 PM [-0700], Tim Buck wrote:
So I've reverted back to SA 2.55. Anyone else see this behavior?
Tim...yes. I had an almost identical problem. Two or three users
suddenly started getting a lot more spam and the headers indeed showed
no SA checks. I too reverted
At 00:03 25/08/2003 -0700, Matt Thoene wrote:
On Friday, August 22, 2003 @ 1:56:26 PM [-0700], Tim Buck wrote:
So I've reverted back to SA 2.55. Anyone else see this behavior?
Tim...yes. I had an almost identical problem. Two or three users
suddenly started getting a lot more spam and the
I installed 2.60 rc1 (upgraded from 2.55) yesterday afternoon. Two
of my users today reported several very obvious spam messages got
through; none has on my account. I looked at the offending messages,
and they had no SpamAssassin headers whatsoever; they, for whatever
reason, were not even
Tim Buck writes:
I installed 2.60 rc1 (upgraded from 2.55) yesterday afternoon. Two
of my users today reported several very obvious spam messages got
through; none has on my account. I looked at the offending messages,
and they had no SpamAssassin headers whatsoever; they, for whatever
On Fri, Aug 22, 2003 at 04:11:45PM -0700, Justin Mason is rumored to have said:
Tim Buck writes:
I installed 2.60 rc1 (upgraded from 2.55) yesterday afternoon. Two
of my users today reported several very obvious spam messages got
through; none has on my account. I looked at the offending
