On 2002-12-16 18:36:47 -0500, Matt Kettler wrote:
You're right, there's no blacklist_from_rcvd.. but do you really need/want
such precautions there?
But unblacklist_from_rcvd would make sense. Please?
Best regards
Martin
--
http://www.tm.oneiros.de/calendar/2003/
Jonathan Duncan said:
I have gotten a couple of vile spams that came through with NO problem
whatsoever because of the test USER_IN_WHITELIST. It seems that the
spammer used my email address in the To: field as well as the From: field.
If all spammers did that, with my current
Nope, this is my manual list and I have version 2.43
Jonathan
Justin Mason [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jonathan Duncan said:
I have gotten a couple of vile spams that came through with NO problem
whatsoever because of the test USER_IN_WHITELIST. It seems that the
spammer used my email
At 11:11 PM 12/16/2002 -0700, Bob Proulx wrote:
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-16 16:24:21 -0500]:
Therefore I assume this is only available in versions newer than 2.31
somewhere. Is that correct?
Yes, the current release version of SA is 2.43, and I think that feature
was added
Hmm, could you explain? If there's no blacklist_from_rcvd what purpose
would unblacklist_from_rcvd fill?
Unless you want to change the semantics of how the un commands work and
what they mean, so you could do:
blacklist_from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
unblacklist_from_rcvd [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Dec 16, 2002 at 07:14:54PM -, Jonathan Duncan wrote:
I have gotten a couple of vile spams that came through with NO problem
whatsoever because of the test USER_IN_WHITELIST. It seems that the
spammer used my email address in the To: field as well as the From: field.
If all
some recommendations:
1) don't ever whitelist yourself. This kind of spammer behavior is SUPER
common. A very noticeable portion of the spam I get is from my own address.
2) If you must whitelist yourself, use a whitelist_from_rcvd not a simple
whitelist_from.
3) In fact, if you can avoid it,
Matt,
That makes a lot of sense. Thank you very much. I didn't see a
blacklist_from_rcvd in the config documentation so I assume there isn't one.
Similar precautions might be helpful, although it might be too much work to
try to match bad address to the servers they might be sending from.
You're right, there's no blacklist_from_rcvd.. but do you really need/want
such precautions there?
I mean.. if I declare a from address to be blacklisted, do I really care
what server it came from? If a spammer forges a from address that is
blacklisted, more power to him... If an innocent
Matt Kettler [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2002-12-16 16:24:21 -0500]:
3) In fact, if you can avoid it, don't ever use a simple whitelist_from,
and always use a whitelist_from_rcvd whenever possible. This closes a LOT
of loopholes like the one you found here.
Hmm... Which version of SA supports
10 matches
Mail list logo
