I'm going to repost a message from Gary Funck that solves this
nicely. I've been running it for awhile and it works like a charm.
--
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu May 29 08:08:49 2003
Date: Wed, 28 May 2003 20:56:10 -0700
From: Gary Funck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SpamAssassin listserve <[E
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 01:34:53PM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox,
> bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips with!)
If you're using procmail, yes. Basically you need to put the logic of
"do I want to filte
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 11:06:41AM +0100, Jim Ford wrote:
> However, I still see SA checking info in the headers of the whitelisted mails.
> Is this normal, please?
Yes. A white/black-list does not stop SA from running over a message.
They simply add a certain value (positive or negative) to the
On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 08:10:15AM -0400, Theo Van Dinter wrote:
> The only way to not have SA check a message is to not call SA under
> certain conditions.
What, using procmail to send the trusted mail straight to the mailbox,
bypassing SA? (Procmail - another program I'll have to get to grips w
Hi,
I'm trying to get to grips with eliminating spam on my single user home
machine and do my bit for the community by using Vipul's Razor. Spamassassin
seems to be working well, but needs tuning. (Ironically, because of the volume
of this list, I seem to spend more time reading spamassassin-talk
