On Sat, 17 Jan 2004, snowchyld wrote:
> how does one go about setting up an SMTPReject wrt SA ?
> are there docs for sendmail/exim/qmail etc ?
>
> i would love to 5xx say spam above certain threshold with a rude message ^_^
For Sendmail, take a look at spamass-milter. Unfortunately, you
w
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 16, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spamassassin on Gateway server (MX)
> On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hi
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> > with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> > victims. It's better than auto-deleting
On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Ross Vandegrift wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> > If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> > with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> > victims. It's better than auto-deleting
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 02:20:16AM -0600, David B Funk wrote:
> If you SMTP reject the spam, it never hits your queue, so no problem
> with the garbage piling up and no bombarding poor innocent 'joe-job'
> victims. It's better than auto-deleting spam, as a legit message
> that is accidentally mis-i
Just a thought: It wouldn't only have simplified matters, it would have
been more secure. Imagine someone hacks your SA box...they'd have access
to your internal network right away (unless there are other measures not
mentioned in place of course) In any case, this setup is not
recommended, but
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Matt Kettler wrote:
> At 09:56 AM 1/15/04 +0545, Pankaj wrote:
> >I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
> >have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
> >How do I do it ? Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
>
[s
I use postfix w/ amavis and spamassassin and it works flawlessly. I placed
the SA box at my MX record's IP address and then relay (using postfix) to my
primary mail server. The mail server is behind my firewall and uses NAT to
send mail out. Actually both boxes are behind the firewall... although
At 09:56 AM 1/15/04 +0545, Pankaj wrote:
I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
How do I do it ? Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
If your mailserver is relaying, it's not possible to jus
I feel I am being a bit misunderstood. I simply need to configure my MX to
have SpamAssassin running.I do not need any antivirus .
How do I do it ?
Running RedHat Linux 8.1 and Sendmail 8.12.10 in it.
List: spamassassin-talkSubject:
RE:
[SAtalk] setting up spamassassin on G
10 matches
Mail list logo
