On Sun, 18 Jan 2004, Robert Menschel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> MR> header L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG Content-Type =~ /boundary=\"\d{15,}\"/
>
> MR> changed from \d{19,} to \d{15,}
>
> I've changed the copy in my files to 13. Frequencies:
The ratware has morphed. I'm now seeing messages tha
Hello Martin,
Sunday, January 18, 2004, 3:58:34 AM, you wrote:
>> L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG -- 153s/0h of 92209 corpus (74874s/17335h) 01/17/04
MR> I've already modified the repeat counts for number of digits in
MR> L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG, since it's not constant:
MR> header L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG
At Sun Jan 18 02:21:14 2004, Robert Menschel wrote:
>
> MR> header L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG Content-Type =~ /boundary=\"\d{19,}\"/
> MR> header L_MSGID_SPAM1 Message-Id =~ /<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>/
> MR> rawbody L_TITLE_MESSAGE m{Message}
> MR> rawbody L_CONVERTED m{
Hello Martin,
Saturday, January 17, 2004, 10:39:15 AM, you wrote:
MR> I've added the following rules to my local.cf:
MR> header L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG Content-Type =~ /boundary=\"\d{19,}\"/
MR> describe L_MIME_BOUND_MANY_DIG MIME boundary contains lots of digits
MR> scoreL_MIME_BOUND_MA
At Thu Jan 15 08:49:37 2004, =?Windows-1252?Q?S=F6nke_Ruempler?= wrote:
>
> hi list,
>
> I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
I've picked out the following, which are common to other similar
messages I've seen:
> Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="3
ly got a rule to nail that sucker and now I'm not
getting any :(
--Chris (Where is my spam?) Santerre
> -Original Message-
> From: Ralf Guenthner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 7:22 AM
> To: Sönke Ruempler
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> S
At 03:49 AM 01/15/04, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
hi list,
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
We have been catching them with the following:
X-Spam-Report:
* 1.0 local_XMAILER_BOGUS X-Mailer =~ /^[a-z][^A-Z0-9]*$/
* 2.0 LE_NI BODY: obfuscated not interested
At 09:49 AM 1/15/04 +0100, Sönke Ruempler wrote:
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
Simple starting things to check (if you're not already doing them)
1) use razor, dcc and/or pyzor.
2) Make sure your bayes is heavily trained (really, this batch of "poison"
has not been
Hi
How about a URI rule testing for the holdontrynow.com link??
Cheers
Ralf G.
Sönke Ruempler wrote:
hi list,
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 62.116.172.149 (68.116.240.99:4887)
by mail
On Thu, 15 Jan 2004, Sönke Ruempler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Subject: confiscate cosponsor gnat
> X-Mailer: huh
> Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=107361675716894&w=2
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=spamassassin-talk&m=107408986927266&w=2
--
hi list,
I wonder if i can to something against these spam messages:
Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from 62.116.172.149 (68.116.240.99:4887)
by mail.city-map.de (62.116.172.149:25) with [XMail 1.17 (Linux/Ix86) ESMTP
Server]
id for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
11 matches
Mail list logo