At 14:20 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Well don't forget that the auto_learn_spam threshold is 15 in 2.55 and 12
> in 2.60, and its very rare that a spam pasted into the *body* of a message
> will be autolearnt, simply because mo
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 06:31:35PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> Don't use auto-learning, really.
Then I'll have to bounce back all other mail
from my working machine to the firewall.
> > So, I moved the filters to my firewall
> which firewall rules do you use to reject spam?
?
I mean: I starte
Carlo Wood wrote on Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:20:07 +0200:
> Anyway, there should be a possibility for me to make sure
> that certain mails are not auto-learned at all - independant of
> their score.
>
Don't use auto-learning, really.
> So, I moved the filters to my firewall
>
which firewall rules do
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Well don't forget that the auto_learn_spam threshold is 15 in 2.55 and 12
> in 2.60, and its very rare that a spam pasted into the *body* of a message
> will be autolearnt, simply because most high scoring spams get most of
> their
Simon Byrnand wrote on Tue, 02 Sep 2003 09:56:54 +1200:
> Likewise if a message scored -5 before whitelisting and -105 total, then it
> WOULD be learnt as ham, because its pre-whitelist score was hammy. Make sense ?
>
I think we discussed this some months ago here, don't remember the outcome, bu
At 06:02 2/09/2003 +0100, Justin Mason wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 02:24 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I don't whitelist this mailing list and I know at least one of the
> develop
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 01:02:47PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> At 02:24 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> I don't whitelist this mailing list and I know at least one of the
> developers (Justin) doesn't either and I don't have
t: Monday, September 01, 2003 7:25 PM
> To: Simon Byrnand
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Bayes and whitelisting
>
[ ]
>
> Take for example this mailinglist, this very mail, it is full of words
> like "whitelist", "SpamAssassin", "au
At 02:24 2/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> On the other hand, there is nothing to stop the message being
autolearnt if
> its score before the whitelisting value is added, so for example if a spam
> would normally score 20 and be aut
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:56:54AM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> On the other hand, there is nothing to stop the message being autolearnt if
> its score before the whitelisting value is added, so for example if a spam
> would normally score 20 and be autolearnt, and you for some reason
> whiteli
At 17:50 1/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:31:34PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > whitelisted mails should not be auto learned.
>
> That is just what Simon said and SA does.
Oh... sorry. He said
S> Please check the docs, Bayes auto_learn does not take notice of
S> whit
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 04:31:34PM +0200, Kai Schaetzl wrote:
> > whitelisted mails should not be auto learned.
>
> That is just what Simon said and SA does.
Oh... sorry. He said
S> Please check the docs, Bayes auto_learn does not take notice of
S> whitelisting: (from man Mail::SpamAssassin::C
Carlo Wood wrote on Mon, 1 Sep 2003 14:47:56 +0200:
> whitelisted mails should not be auto learned.
>
That is just what Simon said and SA does.
Kai
--
Kai Schätzl, Berlin, Germany
Get your web at Conactive Internet Services: http://www.conactive.com
IE-Center: http://ie5.de & http://msie.win
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 02:53:36PM +1200, Simon Byrnand wrote:
> Please check the docs, Bayes auto_learn does not take notice of
> whitelisting: (from man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf)
Well, actually I saw that, but I couldn't believe it :)
whitelisted mails should not be auto learned.
If the develo
At 02:14 1/09/2003 +0200, Carlo Wood wrote:
Hi all,
it is not clear to me how SA handles white listing.
Normally, one does not want to use a white-listed
mail to update the Bayes classifier because once
white-listed the mail could contain ANYTHING.
However, it appears that the whitelisting only
s
15 matches
Mail list logo
