RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-30 Thread Larry Gilson
Hi Mark, -Original Message- From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more than 3 instances of i/i in each

Re: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Keith C. Ivey
Mark Ritchie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is the i and b tags. I don't think that's what's fooling SA. SA strips all that stuff out before looking for phrases. The problem is the lack of phrases to trigger on. Would it be possible to

RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Larry Gilson
Yes, this would be possible. describe MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAGMY: Excessive HTML Tags rawbody MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG/[bi]\/[bi]/i scoreMY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG4.0 Backhair did not hit because the number of characters within the tag is fewer than 6. Creating rules to match fewer than 6 characters

RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Mark Ritchie
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:35 AM To: Mark Ritchie; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code Yes, this would be possible. describe MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAGMY: Excessive HTML Tags rawbody MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG/[bi]\/[bi]/i scoreMY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG

RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Scott Sprunger
Something like this should work, although I am still learning so feel free to correct. rawbody T_OBFU_EMPTY_TAGS /(i|b|u)\/\1/i score T_OBFU_EMPTY_TAGS 0.1 The intended result would be any HTML i, b or u tag followed immediately by a closing tag, with no intervening characters. I did find a

RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Yackley, Matt
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Ritchie Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:14 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code I've added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but I've

RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Bill
Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more than 3 instances of i/i in each email to mark it as spam? Maybe I could just score it lower per instance, say .2 There were 58 instances of i/i in this email and 63 instances of b/b. A test that counted .1 per instance in a

RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code

2003-10-29 Thread Jennifer Wheeler
Yes, this would be possible. describe MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAGMY: Excessive HTML Tags rawbody MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG/[bi]\/[bi]/i scoreMY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG4.0 Backhair did not hit because the number of characters within the tag is fewer than 6. Creating rules to match fewer than 6