Mark Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is the > <i> and <b> tags.
I don't think that's what's fooling SA. SA strips all that stuff out before looking for phrases. The problem is the lack of phrases to trigger on. > Would it be possible to make a rule or adjust > the rules so the <i></i> scores high? There is nothing > inbetween and I'd have to say anyone sending messages like this > is obviously a spammer. It's possible to do something like that with a rawbody rule. I think there's also been talk of adding some checks for such things to the HTML analysis so there could be eval tests for it. It's tricky to avoid false positives, though. Unfortunately a lot of HTML-creating software puts in empty formatting tags like that, though maybe they don't occur often in the middle of words unless put there intentionally. -- Keith C. Ivey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Washington, DC ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program. Does SourceForge.net help you be more productive? Does it help you create better code? SHARE THE LOVE, and help us help YOU! Click Here: http://sourceforge.net/donate/ _______________________________________________ Spamassassin-talk mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talk
