Seems like any attachment, especially a binary such as a pdf
would go over the maximum size to be scanned by SA. This must
have been one tiny pdf, or you have set your SA instance to
scan messages over the max size (default
250k) Most pdf's are much larger than this.
i believe he attached it
At Wed Jan 14 19:38:33 2004, Gary Funck wrote:
For the purposes of these tests how is textual parts defined? For example,
in a multipart/alternative, would the tests be run both on the text part and
the html part? Which MIME types are classified as text? Just for clarity,
if someone
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Kraeuchi
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:05 AM
Got my first false positive :-/
Backhair scored on a .pdf...
Any hints how to avoid these?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.0 tagged_above=3.0 required=5.3
tests=J_BACKHAIR_11, J_BACKHAIR_12,
Seems like any attachment, especially a binary such as a pdf would go over
the maximum size to be scanned by SA. This must have been one tiny pdf, or
you have set your SA instance to scan messages over the max size (default
250k) Most pdf's are much larger than this.
Andreas
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004,
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Stollar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:39 PM
To: Rolf Kraeuchi
Cc: SA
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] FP with backhair
Seems like any attachment, especially a binary such as a pdf
would go over the maximum size
This will be correct in 2.7 when SA starts using their own custom MIME
parser. There are some issues with the current MIME parser, so answer to Q
is a fix is coming soon in the flavor of SA 2.7.
Frederic Tarasevicius
Internet Information Services, Inc.
http://www.i-is.com/
810-794-4400
At 01:44 PM 1/14/2004, Gary Funck wrote:
I'd asked this before (with no answer on the 'dev' list),
Not surprising.. unless it's part of active development work ie: discussion
of methods to fix a bug, coding, test results, etc, a post of a general
question to sadev will generally be ignored as
On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 10:39:15AM -0800, Andreas Stollar wrote:
Seems like any attachment, especially a binary such as a pdf would go over
the maximum size to be scanned by SA. This must have been one tiny pdf, or
you have set your SA instance to scan messages over the max size (default
250k)
Matt replied (in part):
I thought it was only supposed to scan text/html attachments?
I've never heard anyone claim such.
Here's what the current docs. say:
body SYMBOLIC_TEST_NAME /pattern/modifiers
Define a body pattern test. pattern is a Perl regular expression.
The 'body' in this case
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Matt Kettler writes:
At 01:44 PM 1/14/2004, Gary Funck wrote:
I'd asked this before (with no answer on the 'dev' list),
Not surprising.. unless it's part of active development work ie: discussion
of methods to fix a bug, coding, test results,
Got my first false positive :-/
Backhair scored on a .pdf...
Any hints how to avoid these?
X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=12.0 tagged_above=3.0 required=5.3
tests=J_BACKHAIR_11, J_BACKHAIR_12, J_BACKHAIR_13, J_BACKHAIR_14,
J_BACKHAIR_21, J_BACKHAIR_22, J_BACKHAIR_31,
11 matches
Mail list logo
