Replied-to-sender and CC'ed to the list (I usually reply direct to the
list, not the sender) as Sourceforge has rejected my reply twice. :(
Bill Polhemus wrote:
Since I don't want the stuff appended by SA to be part of the email used to
train Bayesian, I have to go through each message (I use
On Sun, 07 Sep 2003 15:55:40 -0400
Burt Juda [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can pipe it thru 'formail' to nuke the headers that SA added, like
so:
cat FILE | formail -I'X-Spam-Checker-Version:' -I'X-Spam-Level:
\
-I'X-Spam-Status:' -ds sa-learn --[s]ham
The '-ds'
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert
Menschel
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 8:25 PM
To: Phil N
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] FW: Feedback on how identified spam is being handled
All spam is then kept to be used as part
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Phil N wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feedback from people that are doing
more than just identifying spam in the subject for their users to handle
themselves.
Specifically:
- are you deleting any messages marked as spam?
- how are you determining when to
:
|
|Subject: Re: [SAtalk] FW: Feedback on how identified spam is being handled
|
---|
On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Phil N wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feedback
Phil N wrote:
I was wondering if I could get some feedback from people that are doing
more than just identifying spam in the subject for their users to handle
themselves.
Specifically:
- are you deleting any messages marked as spam?
No. I'll put them to a user-specific IMAP folder.
- how are
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Phil,
Friday, September 5, 2003, 8:56:40 AM, you wrote:
PN I was wondering if I could get some feedback from people that are
PN doing more than just identifying spam in the subject for their users
PN to handle themselves.
My pleasure,
PN
