Charlie Watts said:
> If we can't get RMS, we can just send the .mp3 of him singing. They'll
> cave in, I'm sure ...
Oh my ghod, the GNU Song. Anything but that! ;)
--j.
___
Spamassassin-talk mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforg
On Fri, 18 Jan 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Yes, it was the network accesses. We've re-done Razor in-house anyway
> (sorry, but we can't release that code, which is a shame because it
> kicks razor's butt - does n-way replication and multi-tiered servers),
> and will be removing all the DNS check
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Matt Sergeant said:
>
> > > Basically a spam-check may take up to 10 seconds per mail, so
> > > sendmail should run only a certain number of concurrent deliveries
> > > (20 or so?) and wait for them to complete
Matt Sergeant said:
> > Basically a spam-check may take up to 10 seconds per mail, so
> > sendmail should run only a certain number of concurrent deliveries
> > (20 or so?) and wait for them to complete before spawning more.
>
> 10 seconds is way too long for us. We aim to get that down to abou
Gotta love it when you sign the contract to be the exclusive email provider for China.
C
On Thu, 2002-01-17 at 01:32, Matt Sergeant wrote:
[1] Yes, 1 billion. Currently we're pushing about 7 million, but we're
ramping up very fast indeed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> I'm not a sendmail expert, but IMO the problem is the number of
> concurrent deliveries sendmail is allowing.
>
> Basically a spam-check may take up to 10 seconds per mail, so
> sendmail should run only a certa
> -Original Message-
> From: brad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Running SA 1.5 / SPAMD -u nobody -d on a machine that accepts
> 88k mails
> per day.
>
>
> Today was the big test, and there was a huge failure. The
> issue is that I
> get so many procmail processes opening that the CP
* Justin Mason ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > I get on an average 350 open procmail processes at any one time. 'ps ax
> > |grep proc | wc -l"
> > I need to figure out how to scale this. The machine is a PIII with 512
> > megs in Raid 5 configuration.
Ugh.
Just a thought, but a more effecient s
brad said:
> Running SA 1.5 / SPAMD -u nobody -d on a machine that accepts 88k mails
> per day.
> Today was the big test, and there was a huge failure. The issue is that I
> get so many procmail processes opening that the CPU average on the machine
> pegs and the load average then causes sendma
