IL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 4:36 PM
Subject: Re: SA in Mailshield by Lyris / (was) Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have
violated GNU
- Original Message -
From: "Greg A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:59 PM
Sub
- Original Message -
From: "Greg A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12, 2003 6:59 PM
Subject: SA in Mailshield by Lyris / (was) Re: [SAtalk] OT: SCO may have violated GNU
> The way I read the license was that you can not sell
And was it trademarked for the current version that we run, or something
that deersoft was working on?
Who was first?
-Mark
Peter Campion-Bye wrote:
The way some on the list have responded would suppose that anyone can copy
SpamAssassin, modify it or integrate it, change the name of it and the
At 05:51 PM 6/12/2003 +0100, Peter Campion-Bye wrote:
> http://www.mailshield.com/products/mailshield/server/whats_new.html
At the bottom of the page in the above link is the line:
Note: SpamAssassin is a trademark of Deersoft, Inc
Putting www.deersoft.com into a browser takes you to the McAfee
>
> The way some on the list have responded would suppose that anyone can copy
> SpamAssassin, modify it or integrate it, change the name of it and then
> resell it for thousands. (ie, Mailshield). This does not make sense to me.
> (Here is the link again.)
>
> http://www.mailshield.com/products/ma
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 08:59:36AM -0700, Greg A wrote:
> The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software.
> You can only charge for duplication fees, installation or
> maintenance but not for the software or customized versions derived
> from it. I could be wrong, I am not a law
The way I read the license was that you can not sell SA software. You can only charge for duplication fees, installation or maintenance but not for the software or customized versions derived from it. I could be wrong, I am not a lawyer...
The way some on the list have responded would suppose th
