down buy this
check.
I'm wondering if the action to be used here would be iptables[name=SPAM
protocol=TCP port=25]
Thoughts?
Tony
Message: 5
Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 14:25:33 +0200
From: Boris Hinzer b.hin...@web-vision.de
Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Does one blacklisted address
Here goes my /etc/fail2ban/jail.local :
[spamdyke-rdns]
enabled = true
filter = spamdyke
action = iptables-allports[name=SPAM, protocol=all]
logpath = /usr/local/psa/var/log/maillog
maxretry = 2
bantime = 604800
And my /etc/fail2ban/filter.d/spamdyke.conf
[Definition]
failregex =
Hello Faris,
we are doing such with fail2ban in combination with spamdyke.
You can take a look at the this procedure in our knowledgebase entry about this
(translated by google):
http://translate.google.de/translate?u=http%3A%2F%2Fkb.web-vision.de%2Fkb%2Farticle%2F69sl=detl=enhl=ie=UTF-8
Hello,
can anybody verify this behavior?
We are facing the situation, that if we whiteliste local emailadresse the smtp
auth is completely skipped.
Server is then acting like an open relay for these mailaddresses.
In spamdyke.conf we have the following:
authentication.
I have no experience with Spamdyke doing the authentication. But make
sure the users are actually doing the authentication process.
Cheers,
Sebastian
On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 19:03 +0200, Boris Hinzer wrote:
Am 20.05.2010 um 18:15 schrieb Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net:
Boris
Great script Eric. It's very useful. Thank you.
Regards,
Boris
Am 05.02.2010 um 19:51 schrieb Eric Shubert:
#!/bin/bash
#
# Copyright (C) 2010 Eric Shubert e...@shubes.net
#
# This script removes old/expired entries in spamdyke's graylist tree.
#
# Original script written by David
At the moment we are trying fail2ban in combination with spamdyke. This
should (IMHO) reduce memory usage.
Please refer to:
http://notes.benv.junerules.com/all/software/qmail-spamdyke-and-fail2ban/
Additonally we added another rule which also blocks DENIED_RBL_MATCH.
This works quite fine for
It seems that these zero-byte files seem to block mail delivery permanently.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org
[mailto:spamdyke-users-boun...@spamdyke.org] Im Auftrag von Boris Hinzer
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Juli 2009 14:36
An: spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org
Hello,
is this a correct behavior that spamdyke does create dir and a sender-named
file, but without a containing ip-address on first arrival of mail?
I've noticed several zero-bytes files existing in greylist-dirs.
Regards,
Boris
___
