[spamdyke-users] Not all traffic logged to maillog

2022-04-08 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I have 4 servers (MXs) configured with spamdyke and I noticed yesterday, that not all the traffic is logged I noticed that because I have the log for the receptors and I can see the traffic loged in qmail send log from the mx, but I didn't find the info in maillog Only 1 server is worki

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
ht just be a case of libcrypto.so being in an unexpected folder; it's possible just adding the -L flag or setting LIBRARY_PATH might fix it. -- Sam Clippinger On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:10 PM, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users <mailto:spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org>> wrote:

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Thanks, but not, I use FreeBSD, not netBSD I prefer to work with sources I downloaded the tar.gz from spamdyke and compile in the old fashion way I like to see what I'm doing :D On 10/23/2020 5:58 PM, Amitai Schleier via spamdyke-users wrote: On 23 Oct 2020, at 21:50, Pablo Murillo (rednet

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
6:20, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users wrote: I applied your patches on the source files, compile with TLS support, and the program was compiled, yes, but, without TLS support I checked the patches before compile and I saw that the only thing you did (about TLS) was to remove all the line

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-23 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
to compile whit tls, the result is the same compiling without tls support Thanks, but, the idea is to compile with TLS On 10/23/2020 9:42 AM, Amitai Schleier via spamdyke-users wrote: On 22 Oct 2020, at 22:10, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users wrote: I'm upgrading few server

Re: [spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-22 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
I'm using now without TLS but I have to move around 50 servers from 11.3 to 12.1 !, anda I need to have TLS because allmost everyone are using smtp with tls, and going back to no-tls will be a big problem On 10/22/2020 5:33 PM, Dirk Kannapinn via spamdyke-users wrote: Had the same issue after

[spamdyke-users] FreeBSD 12.1 problems compiling with TLS

2020-10-22 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I'm upgrading few server from FreeBSD 11.4 to 12.1 and I found that the port fot SpamDyke is broken, so I compile "manually" and I found a problem with OpenSSL Spamdyke is not finding openssl, and openssl is installed ./configure --enable-tls --without-debug-output checking for gcc... gcc

[spamdyke-users] ERROR (nihdns_query()@dns.c): unable to send data packet....

2020-10-14 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi ERROR(nihdns_query()@dns.c:931): unable to send data packet, tried to send 44 bytes: No buffer space available or ERROR(nihdns_query()@dns.c:962): unable to send data packet, tried to send 44 bytes: No buffer space available Today I started seeing this error in my server Any idea ? The am

[spamdyke-users] Is there a way to filter mails from locals domains coming from "the internet" ?

2019-11-12 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi Is there a way to filter mails from locals domains coming from "the internet" ? Weird question : D It's something like a SPF filter I want to block all mails comeing from public IP from domains I have in my server Thanks Pablo Murillo __

[spamdyke-users] How to filter Invalid FROM ?

2018-09-26 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I know the option reject-sender, but I trying to stop mails on a MX server when the FROM header has an invalid value like : servic...@socelec.com.armhs...@loskop.co.za or only a name like "Nielsen" I know the difference beteween the FROM header and the real FROM (return-path), but may be

Re: [spamdyke-users] Question about headers

2017-08-24 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Thanks Sam I thought the same, surely lines 3 to 6 are just to "mislead" Thanks again - Original Message - From: "Sam Clippinger via spamdyke-users" To: "spamdyke users" Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2017 10:35 AM Subject: Re: [spamdyke-users] Question about headers Keep in mind that

Re: [spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content question

2017-08-22 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
er On Aug 18, 2017, at 12:02 PM, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users wrote: Hi Which are the valid headers to filter ? I think, the obviuos ones are: FROM SUBJECT REPLY-TO But.. Return-Path: Message-ID: Received: List-* Are allowed ?

[spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content question

2017-08-18 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi Which are the valid headers to filter ? I think, the obviuos ones are: FROM SUBJECT REPLY-TO But.. Return-Path: Message-ID: Received: List-* Are allowed ? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mail

Re: [spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content question

2017-07-13 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi Which are the valid headers to filter ? I think, the obviuos ones are: FROM SUBJECT REPLY-TO But.. Return-Path: Message-ID: Received: List-* Are allowed ? ___ spamdyke-users mailing list spamdyke-users@spamdyke.org http://www.spamdyke.org/mail

Re: [spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content

2017-05-19 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
h: *goldswatches.com* IOW, just add an asterisk at the end of each pattern. That should do it. -- Sam Clippinger On May 18, 2017, at 8:54 AM, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users wrote: Hi I'm testing some things and I found that Rejecting Messages by Header Content is not workin

[spamdyke-users] Rejecting Messages by Header Content

2017-05-18 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I'm testing some things and I found that Rejecting Messages by Header Content is not working as I expected I have spamdyke 5.0.1 with header-blacklist-file=/spamdb/blacklist_header I'm trying to filter all mails from goldswatches.com, and I have this lines in the file From:*goldswatches.c

Re: [spamdyke-users] reject-sender - Looking for a new feature

2017-05-18 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
long term, the best way to add something like this would probably be to allow spamdyke to run custom commands/scripts that perform additional checks. That would make it much easier to add one-off filters. -- Sam Clippinger On May 9, 2017, at 3:33 PM, Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users

[spamdyke-users] reject-sender - Looking for a new feature

2017-05-09 Thread Pablo Murillo (rednet) via spamdyke-users
Hi I'm looking for an option where the user login with u...@domain.com and write emails with u...@domain.com.ar , this is beacuse we have many domains with aliases (Vpopmail aliases) The reject-sender=not-local solve part of the problem, but not all Is there a chance to have a new option where