I'm tired of spam, i want to use spamdyke with dspam or mailscanner.
I don't want to receive virus, i want to block spam with spamdyke but
also i want to have more features like dspam or mailscanner have,
after the mail server is a lotus domino server.
What's your opinion about my idea?
Thanks
_
nightduke wrote:
> I'm tired of spam, i want to use spamdyke with dspam or mailscanner.
> I don't want to receive virus, i want to block spam with spamdyke but
> also i want to have more features like dspam or mailscanner have,
> after the mail server is a lotus domino server.
> What's your opinion
On 10/31/2010 08:44 AM, Angus McIntyre wrote:
> nightduke wrote:
>> I'm tired of spam, i want to use spamdyke with dspam or mailscanner.
>> I don't want to receive virus, i want to block spam with spamdyke but
>> also i want to have more features like dspam or mailscanner have,
>> after the mail se
I like Qmailtoaster it's easy and people keeps updating but qmailrocks
still a little bit old.
But my question is ab should i use for scanning attachments, simscan?
or what else?
About spamdyke it's wonderfull but a good gui will give us more
information about what's going on with spam, whitelist
At least to me with spf, spamdyke, simscan and clamav is enough to
stop the spam, I use spamassassin and dspam cpu time consuming
especially when I have to run up to 5000 email accounts.
Regards.
Pablo González A.
On 11 November 2010 19:44, nightduke wrote:
> I like Qmailtoaster it's easy and p
Someone has used bitdefender with qmailtoaster and spamdyke ? It's free
since yesterday...
http://www.bitdefender.com/business/antispam-for-mail-servers.html
2010/11/11 Pablo Gonzalez
> At least to me with spf, spamdyke, simscan and clamav is enough to
> stop the spam, I use spamassassin and
