Dear listmembers,
and, naturally, it should to be
> + happy_meal_interrupt (dev->irq, dev, NULL);
> + enable_irq(dev->irq);
> +}
> +#endif
instead of sis900_interrupt (dev->irq, dev NULL);
Thanks & take care
Dieter Jurzitza
--
HARM
Dear listmembers,
could some kind soul tell me whether the following patch is too naive in order
to try to add netconsole support to the sunhme - module?
Many thanks in advance,
take care
Dieter Jurzitza
--- linux/drivers/net/sunhme.c.original 2007-09-14 07:45:24.0 +0200
+++ linux/driv
> That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't
> say this, it isn't true at all.
>
> I have a full rack of Niagara systems that proves that Sun
> cares to some extent.
Right, and I should have said "essentially no direct contributions" to the
SPARC toolchain from Sun. There have b
David Miller wrote:
> From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:08 +0100
>
>> So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64.
>
> That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't
> say this, it isn't true at all.
>
> I have a full rack of N
On 9/13/07, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a full rack of Niagara systems that proves that Sun
Can I have one? :) :)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.o
From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:08 +0100
> So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64.
That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't
say this, it isn't true at all.
I have a full rack of Niagara systems that proves that Sun
c
Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> There have been essentially no contributions to the SPARC toolchain by Sun or
> Canonical people over the last few years.
>
So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64.
What a shame; for the first time in years they have a CPU which is
competitive (fo
Chris Newport wrote:
Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote:
GCC for SPARC is a front end to this compiler, which isn't available
for Linux/SPARC so not really useful at all. If Sun Studio were
available
for GNU/Linux SPARC this front end would probably function the same as
on Solaris, maybe even witho
Sunil Amitkumar Janki wrote:
GCC for SPARC is a front end to this compiler, which isn't available
for Linux/SPARC so not really useful at all. If Sun Studio were available
for GNU/Linux SPARC this front end would probably function the same as
on Solaris, maybe even without any changes at all.
Andrew Walrond wrote:
Andrew Walrond wrote:
David Miller wrote:
That's correct, it's essentially GCC's language front ends
plugged into Sun's compiler backend.
-
And presumably is solaris only doesn't work under gnu/linux?
Sorry; that is thinko/typo/horrible. What I actu
Andrew Walrond wrote:
> David Miller wrote:
>> That's correct, it's essentially GCC's language front ends
>> plugged into Sun's compiler backend.
>> -
>
> And presumably is solaris only doesn't work under gnu/linux?
>
Sorry; that is thinko/typo/horrible. What I actually meant:
Presumably the gc
> Sun have some sort of deal with Ubuntu to support the Niagara, don't
> they? Presumably the Canonical people have some developers working on
> (and contributing to) the (sparc64) gnu toolchain and linux kernel as
> part of that deal?
There have been essentially no contributions to the SPARC tool
David Miller wrote:
>
> So no, Sun really isn't helping with any actual development.
>
Sun have some sort of deal with Ubuntu to support the Niagara, don't
they? Presumably the Canonical people have some developers working on
(and contributing to) the (sparc64) gnu toolchain and linux kernel as
David Miller wrote:
>
> That's correct, it's essentially GCC's language front ends
> plugged into Sun's compiler backend.
> -
And presumably is solaris only doesn't work under gnu/linux?
Andrew Walrond
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe sparclinux" in
the body of a messa
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 03:56, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Note:
>
> This patch consolidates all the previous patches regarding
> the conversion of static arrays sized by NR_CPUS into per_cpu
> data arrays and is referenced against 2.6.23-rc6 .
Looks good to me from the x86 side. I'll leave
From: Sunil Amitkumar Janki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 11:16:00 +0200
> As far as I know, GCC for SPARC appears to be a front end
> to the Sun Studio compiler which happens to translate GCC
> flags to ones suitable for their own compiler.
That's correct, it's essentially GCC's lan
Lijuan Hai wrote:
Maybe you would find what you want at the following URL:
http://www.sun.com/download/products.xml?id=46448222
gccfss means 'GCC for SPARC System'
2007/9/12, Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I have to make buying decisions, and having tested a Sun T1000 for a
while I am
17 matches
Mail list logo
