On Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:56:44 -0700
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Changes for version v3:
>
> cpu_sibling_map has been converted to a per_cpu data array to fix
> build errors on ia64, ppc64 and sparc64 to accomodate references in
> block/blktrace.c and kernel/sched.c when CONFIG_SCHED_SMT is defined.
From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 23:54:13 +0100
> David Miller wrote:
> >
> > And _NO_ this does mean continuing to say that Sun isn't doing enough
> > to satisfy you, that discourages rather than encourages in case you
> > haven't gotten that message LOUD and CLEAR
David Miller wrote:
>
> The big issue you keep missing in all of your rediculious complaints
> is that it takes a lot of time for a company to invest in future
> potential revenue.
>
> Most of Sun's resources are invested in things that make them money
> right now and keep the lights on at their
From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:43:16 +0100
> And I apologise (to everyone) for any unnecessary rhetoric on my part; I
> freely admit that I designed my posts specifically to sparc (ahem) this
> debate, but I guess most of you knew that already ;)
The big issue
Hi David,
David Carlton wrote:
>
> This is true. I'm not sure how many rounds of layoffs we've had over
> the last five years, but there were many, and I'm not completely sure
> that we're done.
>
> It's also true that we're not behaving as well as we should in this
> situation. I've forwarded
On Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:27:38 -0700, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Like most tech companies that have seen better days, Sun's been
> cutting costs to the bone; I'm sure that they don't feel rich.
This is true. I'm not sure how many rounds of layoffs we've had over
the last five years, but
From: "Jurzitza, Dieter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 08:25:45 +0200
> +static void poll_happy_meal (struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> + disable_irq(dev->irq);
> + sis900_interrupt (dev->irq, dev, NULL);
> + enable_irq(dev->irq);
> +}
> +#endif
You obviously did not e
David Miller wrote:
> > I have a full rack of Niagara systems that proves that Sun
> > cares to some extent. I get early hardware access and
> > documentation access, plus engineers to talk to and ask
> > questions of.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 06:43:35AM +0100, Andrew Walrond wrote:
> With all du
Andrew Walrond wrote:
David Miller wrote:
From: Andrew Walrond <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:02:08 +0100
So, Sun really _don't_ give a damn about gnu/linux on sparc64.
That is a gross mischaracterization of the situation, don't
say this, it isn't true at all.
I have a full ra
