[spctools-discuss] Re: Incompatibility between CPAS 8.1 and the latest TPP

2013-03-28 Thread Darryl Davis
Hi Edwin, Did you ever get an answer to this? We always install Labkey/CPAS first but would be nice to know the root cause. DD On Thursday, September 25, 2008 10:18:15 PM UTC-4, Edwin Lowe wrote: > > I mentioned this on the list a while ago. I have a problem with running > CPAS 8.1 and the la

[spctools-discuss] Re: TPP 4.6: Cant convert RAW files, any help?

2013-03-28 Thread Hanice Sun
I found the msconvert of proteowizard is very convenient. It comes with vendor reader, so I don't need to install xcalibur. http://proteowizard.sourceforge.net/downloads.shtml Maybe you can convert the RAW file to mzML before using TPP. On Friday, November 23, 2012 11:07:39 PM UTC+8, Alex w

[spctools-discuss] which strategy to control false positive for x!tandem?

2013-03-28 Thread Hanice Sun
I am considering using target-decoy FDR or directly using E-value of x!tandem? It seems that xtandem author recommend the latter. *(* *This reference describes the idea of using reversed sequences to validated large collections of protein identifications. The GPM has this method built-in as a

[spctools-discuss] RTCalc (ANN)

2013-03-28 Thread magnus.palmb...@gmail.com
Dear All (especially David), I am trying to use the ANN retention time predictor. The training runs OK, but when trying to use it I get this error: gsl: init_source.c:29: ERROR: vector length n must be positive integer Default GSL error handler invoked. This application has requested the Runtim

Re: [spctools-discuss] RTCalc (ANN)

2013-03-28 Thread David Shteynberg
Hi Magnus, Can you forward me the files you have and the commands you are using and I will debug? Thanks, -David On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:47 AM, magnus.palmb...@gmail.com < magnus.palmb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Dear All (especially David), > > I am trying to use the ANN retention time predictor

Re: [spctools-discuss] RTCalc (ANN)

2013-03-28 Thread magnus.palmb...@gmail.com
OK - I sent the training set and the ANN model by e-mail. On Thursday, 28 March 2013 18:49:41 UTC+1, David Shteynberg wrote: > > Hi Magnus, > > Can you forward me the files you have and the commands you are using and I > will debug? > > Thanks, > -David > > On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 10:47 AM, magnu

[spctools-discuss] Re: TPP 4.6: Cant convert RAW files, any help?

2013-03-28 Thread mfairfaxb
I found out my problem thanks to following the directions that Alex wrote. I was lacking part of the Microsoft Visual C ++ 2010 Redistribution package on the computer. Once I downloaded the file I needed (MSVCP100.dll) from Microsoft, the file conversion in TPP worked just fine. Thanks! Mar

Re: [spctools-discuss] RTCalc (ANN)

2013-03-28 Thread David Shteynberg
Thanks for the files you've provided. I was able to find and fix one error in the code. TPP revision 6171 from trunk should contain this fix. Also I found an error in your commands. When you train a a Neural Net with RTCalc you have to use the ANN= option if you want to then apply the trained m

[spctools-discuss] protein identification FDR

2013-03-28 Thread Pavel
Hi all, I have a question about FDR estimation for protein identification (using reversed decoy database together with target database in a single file). I can estimate the probability threshold for peptides to get for example 1% FDR. My question is how to use this peptide probability thre

Re: [spctools-discuss] which strategy to control false positive for x!tandem?

2013-03-28 Thread Amit Yadav
Hi, Interpretation of e-values will always be coupled to the database size (more appropriately, the size of candidates for a particular spectrum). So, I do not think it is the correct metric for controlling false positives. When the authors had suggested using e-values, I believe FDR was not in u

Re: [spctools-discuss] protein identification FDR

2013-03-28 Thread Jesse Meyer
Hi Pavel, The choice of peptide-level FDR or protein-level FDR depends on what conclusions you hope to make. If you want to make conclusions about the peptides you have identified, you can use peptide-level FDR. If you are trying to identify proteins for biological reasons you should use pr