April 23, 2009 12:12 PM
To: spctools-discuss
Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Limit on number of pep.xml files that can be
analyzed with XInteract?
There it goes.
Is there any difference in the analysis or output with or without
globbing?
On Apr 23, 12:09 pm, "Brian Pratt" wrote:
>
legroups.com
>
> [mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kristian
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:05 PM
> To: spctools-discuss
> Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Limit on number of pep.xml files that can be
> analyzed with XInteract?
>
> The globbing com
> > > On Apr 21, 4:26 pm, "Eric Deutsch"
> > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > It is likely the shell that imposes the limit.
>
> > > > > > > When you type:
>
> > > > > > > xinteract *.pep.xml
>
> >
into the full list before
feeding
> > the
> > > > list
> > > > > > to xinteract. The shell has an inherent limit. xinteract does
not.
> > For
> > > > this
> > > > > > very reason, you can get xinteract to the globbing for you w
> > > > > > to xinteract. The shell has an inherent limit. xinteract does not.
> > For
> > > > this
> > > > > > very reason, you can get xinteract to the globbing for you with:
>
> > > > > > xinteract '*.pep.xml'
&
> > > > > the shell expands that wildcard into the full list before feeding
> > the
> > > > list
> > > > > > to xinteract. The shell has an inherent limit. xinteract does not.
> > For
> > > > this
> > > > > > ver
ng
> the
> > > list
> > > > > to xinteract. The shell has an inherent limit. xinteract does not.
> For
> > > this
> > > > > very reason, you can get xinteract to the globbing for you with:
> >
> > > > > xinteract '*.pep.xml&
xinteract and it will resolve
> > it
> > > > for you. This has been used on over 35,000 pepXML files at once. It
> > works.
>
> > > > Eric
>
> > > > > -Original Message-
> > > > > From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com [m
gt;
> > > Eric
> >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:spctools-
> > > > disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian Pratt
> > > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:11 PM
> &g
age-
> > > From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com [mailto:spctools-
> > > disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian Pratt
> > > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:11 PM
> > > To: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
> > > Subject:
--Original Message-
> > From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
> > [mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kristian
> > Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 3:00 PM
> > To: spctools-discuss
> > Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Limit on number of pep.xm
spctools-
> disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Brian Pratt
> Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2009 4:11 PM
> To: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
> Subject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Limit on number of pep.xml files that can
> be analyzed with XInteract?
>
>
> There's not meant to be a limita
bject: [spctools-discuss] Re: Limit on number of pep.xml files that can be
analyzed with XInteract?
I have installed 4.2.1, but the problem persists. After a bit of
experimenting, I've found that XInteract can only handle up to 99
input *.pep.xml files at a time.
The operation fails with t
I have installed 4.2.1, but the problem persists. After a bit of
experimenting, I've found that XInteract can only handle up to 99
input *.pep.xml files at a time.
The operation fails with the message "failed: Operation not
permitted".
On Apr 16, 1:21 pm, Natalie Tasman wrote:
> Hi Kristian,
Hi Kristian,
Also, 4.2.1 contained many bug fixes. I'm not sure if this would have been
addressed, but it's always most efficient for us if you can try to replicate
the issue on the latest version.
-Natalie
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Christine Vogel wrote:
>
> I have had some problems
I have had some problems before if any of the pep.xml files had identical
names. Renaming them (and paths/names within the files) solved that
problem.
Christine
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 2:17 PM, Brian Pratt wrote:
>
> There's not meant to be a limitation - can you give an example of a command
>
There's not meant to be a limitation - can you give an example of a command
line that fails?
-Original Message-
From: spctools-discuss@googlegroups.com
[mailto:spctools-disc...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Kristian
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 11:56 AM
To: spctools-discuss
Subject:
17 matches
Mail list logo
