Hello,
I ran into a number of source files which include the standard
GPL-2.0+ license header, but augmented with the following addendum:
For the avoidance of doubt the "preferred form" of this code is one which
is in an open non patent encumbered format. Where cryptographic key signing
Hello,
I wrote:
> I ran into a number of source files which include the standard
> GPL-2.0+ license header, but augmented with the following addendum:
>
> For the avoidance of doubt the "preferred form" of this code is one which
> is in an open non patent encumbered format. Where cryptog
This look like the Guile license
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/docs/docs-1.6/guile-ref/Guile-License.html
michel.ruf...@alcatel-lucent.com, PhD
Software Coordination Manager, N&P IS/IT
Distinguished Member of Technical Staff
Tel +33 6 75 25 21 94
Alcatel-Lucent International, Centre de Villar
Le 22/01/2014 12:41, Wolfgang Denk a écrit :
> I found more "augmented" versions of GPL-2.0+ ; some libgcc files add
> this clause:
>
> In addition to the permissions in the GNU General Public License, the
> Free Software Foundation gives you unlimited permission to link the
> compiled
Perhaps there's a need to treat the "license text" not as a single string, but
as a set.
E.G., "GPL-2.0+,preferred-form,link-exception".
--- David A. Wheeler
-Original Message-
From: spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org
[mailto:spdx-legal-boun...@lists.spdx.org] On Behalf Of RUFFIN, MICHE
10am PT / 11am MT / 1pm ET
Call this number: (United States) 1-415-363-0849
Enter this PIN: 336247
Alternative Numbers: http://www.yuuguu.com/audio
Agenda:
1) Welcome Paul Madick from HP as our new Legal Team co-lead!!
2) License Matching Guidelines - license templates
Jilayne has been going t
