Hi Philippe,
Thanks for the context and proposal.
I now understand better where the comma proposal is coming from.
The proposal to add commas is reasonable and helps with the Debian
community. I am still concerned, however, that having 2 ways to express the
same semantics is going to be confusi
> J Lovejoy wrote:
>> The issue identified on the call today (and Mark will correct me if I've
>> misstated) is that when AND is used at the file level (Section 4), it's
>> clear that both licenses apply to the given file. However, when AND is used
>> at the package level (Section 3), it could mea
Here is my understanding of how the "AND" thread started:
Mark brought up a concern about the meaning of AND.
He felt this could be misleading to have to say AND in a top level
package without details about what each license applies to which file
exactly. And Debian uses a comma to provide a list
