Hi Richard,
Let me try to answer, since I was the one who did the "unifying" markup.
Our goal is obviously to match the three GPLCC variants and (ideally) not match
anything else. Unfortunately, the latter part is not 100% achievable, but I
feel the stuff we allow on top of the original variants
Hi all,
I was hoping that others long-standing members of the SPDX legal community
would jump in on this thread, but a few days have gone by now and no further
discussion, so let me summarize some pertinent background, where I think we
are, and any remaining questions or issues that need to be
Hi folks,
I'm a little late to this discussion, but I think I should weigh in. To
me this discussion is very odd, at least from the context of the Kernel
Enforcement Statement. I don't think it makes any sense to encode the
KES in an SPDX tag, and I am leaning in the same direction on the GPLCC
I think that a KES Exception on the SPDX list should consist only of the
three indented paragraphs in the text at
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/kernel-enforcement-statement.rst
basically lines 18-36.
I also think that anyone shold be
On Mon, 2018-12-10 at 15:58 -0700, J Lovejoy wrote:
[...]
> C) The issue comes down to how the short identifier would be
> effectively used due to the KES's slightly different implementation
> as described above in 1-6.
[...]
> C-iii) There is also the possibility that people might incorrectly
> u
Hi, myself Baba Nayak. I am little confused where to start for
contribution. Can anyone guide me?
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2468): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2468
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/2
On Mon, Dec 10, 2018 at 7:47 PM James Bottomley <
james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com> wrote:
>
> So I think, realistically, the kernel wouldn't ever use this. Now that
> means don't do it, but I think it's legitimate to wonder how many other
> projects would have similar problems.
>
Which lea
