Hi Brad,
As no documentation (other than searching the mailing list archive) on
the spdx.org site seems to point to github right now, I think it would
be best if someone could fix git.spdx.org sooner than later.
I would very much like to see both typos you mention fixed.
Regarding https://github
point I am trying to make is that it may be desirable to
transcode some UTF-8 into a cannonical and recommended encoding form
when doing things like license extraction.
--
Mark D. Baushke
m...@juniper.net
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
ding of my question as it relates to
UTF-8 selection for XML templates.
Please pardon the length of this message, I only endeavor to make my
question more clear.
--
Mark D. Baushke
m...@juniper.net
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
Brad Edmondson writes:
> Thanks Mark,
>
> FWIW I believe that Mark Baushke looked at the current version of the
> net-SNMP package during our call today and found that its constituent parts
> all pointed to a single top-level license file that contained the license
> stack at issue. So while you
Alexios makes a good point.
An alternative would be to use an ISO 8601 to express time.
See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO_8601
Version: 3.0 published on 2017-12-28
Version: 3.0 of 2017-12-28
I will also note that if you do no like the International Standard
Organization's view of time, you
e Apple's DTD for plist files from
-//Apple Computer/DTD PLIST 1.0//EN).
--
Mark D. Baushke
m...@juniper.net
Security, from Chip to Cloud
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
hardcoding that into the XML Editor itself.
Perhaps it would be wise for the XML Editor to consume a file of the
curent DTDs for whatever happens to be the current SPDX XML dialect?
--
Mark D. Baushke
m...@juniper.net
Security, from Chip to Cloud
___
Spdx
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#2674): https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spdx-legal/message/2674
Mute This Topic: https://lists.spdx.org/mt/34201586/21656
Group Owner: spdx-legal+ow...@lists.spdx.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.spdx.org/g/Spd
Hi Matija,
Wouldn't that have been lapsus digiti rather than lapsus calami?
I will admit that my latin is mostly self-taught. But a slip of the
finger might be a miskeying rather than the pen, unless you were
scribing with a digital pen or something...
Curious,
-- Mark
-=-=-=-=-
My comments are in-line. Look for MDB:
On Aug 9, 2020, at 12:33 PM, Smith Tanjong Agbor
mailto:stanjongag...@gmail.com>> wrote:
After discussing with mentors: Steve and Gary; we thought it wise to seek
everyone's opinion on two topics:
1. Change back the isMatch field to Boolean(true/false)
In
10 matches
Mail list logo
