ing texts evolving ?
> Software authors may modify license conditions at any time.
> How can we ensure that the license texts on the spdx/licenses site are up
> to date?
>
> Why not list the commercial licences ?
>
> Thank in advance for your answer.
>
> Best regards,
> Béné
; [4]: https://lists.spdx.org/pipermail/spdx-legal/2017-August/002145.html
> Subject: Re: New License/Exception Request: EPL-2.0
> Date: Fri, 25 Aug 2017 19:37:08 +
> Message-ID: <9C019F31-919B-4CD1-A881-7588937C7964@
> blackducksoftware.com>
>
> --
on and well known name for a very common and well known license,
> instead of a “vanity name”?
>
> Thanks,
> Jilayne
>
>
> SPDX Legal Team co-lead
> opensou...@jilayne.com
>
>
> On Dec 21, 2017, at 1:40 AM, Philippe Ombredanne <pombreda...@nexb.com>
> wrote:
&
___
> Spdx-legal mailing list
> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
>
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects
The Eclipse Foundation
___
Spdx-legal maili
SHOULD, not a MUST. I view this as a
> stylistic recommendation.
>
> --- David A. Wheeler
>
> ___
> Spdx-legal mailing list
> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
>
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open Source Projects
The Eclipse Foundation
___
Spdx-legal mailing list
Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/listinfo/spdx-legal
-exception" key that has
> > the combined text of the classpath-exception-2.0 and the "assembly
> > exception"
> >
> > The benefits are that there is no need to deal with any new "with
> > with" expressio
I had intended to attend the call, but entered the coordinates incorrectly
in my calendar. My apologies for missing.
The EPL-2.0 as it exists on the Eclipse Foundation website contains the
actual and final text.
landing page: http://www.eclipse.org/legal/epl-2.0
html:
ps they meant "EPL-2.0 OR GPL-2.0". That way, recipients could
> choose which one could be used.
>
> --- David A. Wheeler
>
> ___
> Spdx-legal mailing list
> Spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> https://lists.spdx.org/mailman/list
gt; compatibility feature of MPL 2.0 is not described or (I think) generally
> thought of as an "exception".
>
> Richard
> --
>
> From: "Wayne Beaton" <wayne.bea...@eclipse-foundation.org>
> To: spdx-legal@lists.spdx.org
> Se
I'll have to shepherd this
exception through as well.
Is this syntax even supported?
FWIW, in a fit of stupidity--after misreading a comment on another issue--I
opened a GitHub Issue <https://github.com/spdx/license-list/issues/16> to
track this.
Thanks,
Wayne
--
Wayne Beaton
Director of Open
10 matches
Mail list logo
