Gary O'Neall [mailto:g...@sourceauditor.com]:
> If we have more than one line for a compound set of licenses, it would be
> ambiguous if the text following the first line of a compound license is part
> of the license expression or just some other text. To solve this ambiguity,
> we introduced the
n encapsulation? (was:
> signifigance of nested parenthesis with only ORs?)
>
> W. Trevor King [mailto:wk...@tremily.us]:
> > The Appendix V wording for that is:
> >
> > Representing Multiple Licenses
> >
> > Multiple licenses can be represented using a SPDX
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 07:06:56PM +, Wheeler, David A wrote:
> W. Trevor King:
> > The Appendix V wording for that is:
> >
> > Representing Multiple Licenses
> >
> > Multiple licenses can be represented using a SPDX license
> > expression as defined in Appendix IV. A set of licenses m
W. Trevor King [mailto:wk...@tremily.us]:
> The Appendix V wording for that is:
>
> Representing Multiple Licenses
>
> Multiple licenses can be represented using a SPDX license expression
> as defined in Appendix IV. A set of licenses must be enclosed in
> parentheses (this is a conventi
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 06:21:05PM +, Wheeler, David A wrote:
> The section you want to consult is SPDX specification version 2.1,
> Appendix IV ("SPDX License Expressions"):
> https://spdx.org/spdx-specification-21-web-version#h.jxpfx0ykyb60
>
> Subsection "Composite License Expressions" says
