I know that my comment is not in the subject, but...
How can we use the kernel driver ? (compiled as a speedtch.o module ?)
;)
KnuX
- Original Message -
From: "Duncan Sands" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Edouard Gomez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003
Hello Edouard,
> I guess the sourceforge anonymous cvs is still in a pity state and
> lagging way behind the developer cvs access.
>
> This patch was already applied with the changes I listed. It was not a
> patch modification request but a report. Let's blame sourceforge that
> made
Hi,
(One man thread :)
> Correction. unused_cells is initialised to lbuf at the first loop, and the
> value of unused_cells is changed to atm_pointer by the call to
> aal5_frame_from_atm_cells. This is probably a way to walk through lbuf. Ie
> the use of unused_cells instead of lbuf makes sens
Leonard den Ottolander ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The two checks whether pti == 1 can be merged. Dropping the "idiotic
> frame length" check, using the constants from atm.h, renaming n1 to
> nb_cells, moving the declaration of nb_cells inside the if (pti == 1)
> and simplifiying the payload
Hi,
I wrote:
> > The lbuf usage is still needed, it's the reading buffer. unused_cell is
> > just a pointer that keeps tracks of pppoa3 progress into the read buffer
> > if there are still ATM cells left in.
>
> Then that should be changed back. The current patch doesn't seem to use
> lbuf a
