Actually, with the latest fedora (and vanilla 2.6 kernel for
that matter) you don't need modem_run at all since David Woodhouse
and I implemented in-kernel firmware loading... You need to put
the stage 1 and stage 2 firmware files somewhere in the firmware
path (mine are in /usr/local/lib/firmwar
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Actually, with the latest fedora (and vanilla 2.6 kernel for
> that matter) you don't need modem_run at all since David Woodhouse
> and I implemented in-kernel firmware loading...
That's great news. But I guess the ppp libatm.so problem wasn't solved, am I
right (for Fedora
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Actually, with the latest fedora (and vanilla 2.6 kernel for
> that matter) you don't need modem_run at all since David Woodhouse
> and I implemented in-kernel firmware loading... You need to put
> the stage 1 and stage 2 firmware files somewhere in the firmware
> path (mine
On Monday 22 November 2004 10:23, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Actually, with the latest fedora (and vanilla 2.6 kernel for
> > that matter) you don't need modem_run at all since David Woodhouse
> > and I implemented in-kernel firmware loading... You need to put
> > the stage 1
> andy:~$ gcc -o firmware firmware.c -DSTANDALONE_EXTRACTER
> firmware.c:43:17: crc.h: No such file or directory
> firmware.c:529:17: crc.c: No such file or directory
> andy:~$
>
> Looks like it needs crc.c and crc.h.
Yes, sorry about that. I've included all needed files at the
end of this emai
Duncan Sands wrote:
> Yes. The difference between the firmware.c I supplied and the one from
> the user space driver is simply that it names the files speedtch-1.bin etc.
>
Hmm...they're still coming out as boot.bin and firmware.bin...
> If you compile your kernel with CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=y then yo
On Monday 22 November 2004 08:02, Duncan Sands wrote:
> Actually, with the latest fedora (and vanilla 2.6 kernel for
> that matter) you don't need modem_run at all since David Woodhouse
> and I implemented in-kernel firmware loading... You need to put
> the stage 1 and stage 2 firmware files some
> Are there any disadvantages to doing it this way compared using modem_run?
I don't know of any [*].
All the best,
Duncan.
[*] I know of a bug in the kernel module which might bite you, but probably not.
Liste de diffusion modem ALCATEL SpeedTouch USB
Pour se désinscrire : mailto:[EMAIL PRO
On Monday 22 November 2004 18:18, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Duncan Sands wrote:
> > Yes. The difference between the firmware.c I supplied and the one from
> > the user space driver is simply that it names the files speedtch-1.bin etc.
> >
> Hmm...they're still coming out as boot.bin and firmware.bi
