[speedtouch] Re: web site update + progress

2001-03-29 Thread Tony Hoyle
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > And bad news for Tony : I now use USBDEVFS_SUBMITURB. :-( There's a new uhci.c out that looks like it changes a lot of the spinlock stuff... I'm trying it to see if it makes things work. If not I'll have to compile a UP kernel until it's fixed. Tony -- Don't cl

[speedtouch] Re: web site update + progress

2001-03-30 Thread Tony Hoyle
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > But it seems there is still something wrong with endpoint 7. You'll find > some traces in attachement (available in trace-pppd-2.txt in the tar.gz). > It seems you're reaping your URBs too fast. I rewrote using a signal handler and the packets began to make a lot mo

[speedtouch] Re: Testers needed

2001-03-30 Thread Tony Hoyle
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > It will generate a pppoa2.log. Send it the mailing list with any relevant > information, such as strange messages in /var/log/message. Also send ALL > the pppd[] messages. The newest file I could find on your website was from the 29th. This still exhibits the same pr

[speedtouch] Re: Babble problem

2001-03-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Rakotomalala Renaud wrote: > > And It's wrong because I'm on Nildram (UK) with 512/256. > Another one :-) And I thought there weren't that many of us... :-) Tony -- Don't click on this sig - a cyberwoozle will eat your underwear. [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.nothing-on.tv Liste d

[speedtouch] More output

2001-03-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
This is the output from modem_diag you asked for. Tony -- Don't click on this sig - a cyberwoozle will eat your underwear. [EMAIL PROTECTED]http://www.nothing-on.tv spock:/home/tmh/alcatel/speedtouch# ./modem_diag -v -m Yeah, I found your ADSL modem with VendorID=06b9 & ProductID=406

[speedtouch] Re: More output

2001-03-31 Thread Tony Hoyle
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > So, it seems they are some 'shift' somewhere. Anyway, I've got a working > configuration with 'pppoa2' (latest .tar.gz updated few minutes ago). No > more 'truncated' IP packets, LOST packets instead :-) Congratulations! I was able to ping remote hosts successfully (d

[speedtouch] Re: A new release is coming out ...

2001-04-02 Thread Tony Hoyle
Stuart Luscombe wrote: > Does this mean that UHCI won't work...sorry if it is a dumb sounding > question, but my > controller uses UHCI > I suspect it's just VIA chipsets that won't work. I was getting reasonable results with an Intel UHCI controller on the last version. Tony -- Don't click

[speedtouch] Re: Ready to test ... go!

2001-04-03 Thread Tony Hoyle
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > Send the list your config (UHCI/OHCI, SMP or not, which pppd version & > which kernel) and your results (difficulties, upload/download speed). Intel UHCI (tried both drivers), kernel 2.4.2-ac26 (Patched to fix SMP), SMP, pppd 2.4.0 release. Lots of packet loss (91%

[speedtouch] Re: Speedtouch USB

2001-04-03 Thread Tony Hoyle
Dominique DELANDE wrote: > I also tried the new Alcatel mgmt (version 1.3.1). No change : the > computer > hangs with no error messages at the end of the modem initialization. > Whether the speedtch module is loaded or not does not change anything. I assume you have an SMP kernel... You need t

[speedtouch] Re: Speedtouch USB

2001-04-03 Thread Tony Hoyle
Dominique DELANDE wrote: > No, no SMP enabled in the kernel. I do not know where the bug comes > from. > Maybe because I removed the hotplug package... > You don't need hotplug (I never got it to work properly anyway). If you just modprobe speedtch and run the management app of your choice it

[speedtouch] Tried experimenting with code...

2001-04-03 Thread Tony Hoyle
Since I couldn't get the latest version to work reliably, I tried stripping down the code to a bare minimum - bulk transfers, one at a time, reaping on completion. With this arrangement I was able to connect first time & get really good pings (20-22ms). Very stable, until I fired up mozilla,

[speedtouch] Re: Tried experimenting with code...

2001-04-04 Thread Tony Hoyle
Benoit PAPILLAULT wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, Tony Hoyle wrote: > > >> Since I couldn't get the latest version to work reliably, I tried >> stripping down the code to a bare minimum - bulk transfers, one at a >> time, reaping on completion. > >

[speedtouch] Re: Backdoor on the Speed Touch

2001-04-10 Thread Tony Hoyle
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > - bypass the authntification with "expert" mode, but > you need to know the chap algorithm ( the variable > used are the mac adress and firmware version ). The > author doesn't give this algorithm. The password is an 10 digit integer. You could brute force that o