Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: autodoc for Java source?

2010-02-24 Thread Kevin Horn
The new domains feature in the upcoming 1.0 should be a good way forward, assuming you can wait that long... see: http://pythonic.pocoo.org/2009/9/12/new-in-sphinx-1-0-domains and: http://pythonic.pocoo.org/2010/1/7/new-year-s-python-meme-and-status Good luck! Kevin Horn On Tue, Feb 23, 2010

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: autodoc for Java source?

2010-02-24 Thread Chris Collins
That confirms my suspicion that I just need to bite the bullet and copy and paste my JavaDocs into some rst files. Thankfully there will be an easier way in the future. Thanks for the links, Kevin. On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Kevin Horn kevin.h...@gmail.com wrote: The new domains feature

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: autodoc for Java source?

2010-02-24 Thread Janet Swisher
Ouf! That defeats the idea of keeping code and doc comments in the same place. You'll need to be vigilant to be sure the docs are kept up to date. --Janet On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Chris Collins xop...@gmail.com wrote: That confirms my suspicion that I just need to bite the bullet and

Re: [sphinx-dev] Re: autodoc for Java source?

2010-02-24 Thread Chris Collins
Yes. Separating the Javadocs from the source code is definitely not the way I wanted to go. But Sphinx remains my best possible solution for formatting the document I am working on so I will try to make the best of it at this point. Indeed, I'm not sure now if I should use the autodoc command at

[sphinx-dev] Re: autodoc for Java source?

2010-02-24 Thread Roger Binns
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Collins wrote: Yes. Separating the Javadocs from the source code is definitely not the way I wanted to go. I generate a whole bunch of my docs by parsing C source files - the docs are actually about resulting Python visible functions and